QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by 9moon:
B-Rock Steady Purdy's situation is not different than Grappy after we traded for him.. if Brick by Brick Brothers feel that it's all KYLE, then why pay the guy?

that's the point i am making. brock is good or solid. i'm still looking to upgrade this position, ideally to a guy who is a game changer not just a game manager.

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by 9moon:
B-Rock Steady Purdy's situation is not different than Grappy after we traded for him.. if Brick by Brick Brothers feel that it's all KYLE, then why pay the guy?

that's the point i am making. brock is good or solid. i'm still looking to upgrade this position, ideally to a guy who is a game changer not just a game manager.

Like you said, B-rock is good and solid.. but he seems limited, especially when the weather is bad.. so, if the kid from Notre Dame is there in the 3rd, I'd move UP and draft him..

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by 9moon:
B-Rock Steady Purdy's situation is not different than Grappy after we traded for him.. if Brick by Brick Brothers feel that it's all KYLE, then why pay the guy?

that's the point i am making. brock is good or solid. i'm still looking to upgrade this position, ideally to a guy who is a game changer not just a game manager.

Originally posted by captveg:
This has become an incredibly stupid argument, and for Niner Talk that's saying something.

Originally posted by Koldo:
Really?!

Those Trey Lance takes are still some of the worst I've seen on this forum.

Originally posted by genus49:
I can't wait until we get this deal done so we can actually discuss real things vs extreme hypotheticals.

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:

Originally posted by captveg:
This has become an incredibly stupid argument, and for Niner Talk that's saying something.

We have a lot of really, really interesting "fans" on this site who firmly believe we need to fire Kyle and Lynch and cut Brock and start all over again just because we lost in OT of the Super Bowl. It's extremely bizarre, isn't it?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by genus49:
I can't wait until we get this deal done so we can actually discuss real things vs extreme hypotheticals.

Half the stuff in here are hypotheticals

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by 9moon:
B-Rock Steady Purdy's situation is not different than Grappy after we traded for him.. if Brick by Brick Brothers feel that it's all KYLE, then why pay the guy?

that's the point i am making. brock is good or solid. i'm still looking to upgrade this position, ideally to a guy who is a game changer not just a game manager.

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:

Originally posted by 9moon:
B-Rock Steady Purdy's situation is not different than Grappy after we traded for him.. if Brick by Brick Brothers feel that it's all KYLE, then why pay the guy?

that's the point i am making. brock is good or solid. i'm still looking to upgrade this position, ideally to a guy who is a game changer not just a game manager.

Originally posted by genus49:
Yeah I'm aware of that...just seems silly to get into these battles for hypotheticals that may never happen.

It's one thing when we're talking draft because in theory any player could be in play but pages of pages arguing about how the 49ers need to handle Purdy and his team demanding a crazy deal seems unnecessary when there hasn't even been any rumors of the deal getting contentious.

Hell it's been so quiet in regards to that Grant Cohn hasn't been able to make a click bait post about it.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
You're wrong weekly so there's that lol.

What were the takes? I just wanted him to play more football. He got hurt multiple times and Brock outplayed him.

I was wrong in my evaluation of him being somewhat ready to play (and admitted that).

Originally posted by Koldo:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
like i said, our Convos never discussed FGTD until you just found that out, now you somehow know LJ was only going to take FGTD.

Balt not paying him FGTD is not the win to this discussion, Balt still made him the highest paid and most GTD for a QB

You wouldn't be ok with making the Brock the highest paid with the most GTD if we still didn't meet the demands like LJ

Maybe you didn't understand that, again that's not my problem. He wanted a certain amount of money and Baltimore didn't want to give him that SO they let the market dictate it. You can strawman that as much as you want…doesn't change anything.

If teams said yes please let me pay Brock more than any football player ever. Then you're at crossroads and you either pay him that or discuss trade compensation. It's not different than what LA is doing with Stafford. Which is the whole damn point and why I brought it up (because you said it NEVER happens).

FWIW it's okay to be wrong about something. I'm as stubborn as anyone in here but I've at least admitted I was wrong at one point…I don't think you've ever done that.

Really?!

Those Trey Lance takes are still some of the worst I've seen on this forum.