QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
I don't give a rat's ass about Jimmy, but you keep hiding behind that. You hate Purdy because he exposed Trey, and you're hoping for his downfall. You, ring, NY, and a few others. It's pathetic.

Brock didn't expose Trey. Brock exposed Jimmy.

Brock was miles better than both and that's why they are both gone now.

No one is rooting for Purdy to fail here.

Yes he exposed Jimmy as well. And of course he exposed Trey, why he got traded lol. Some just can't accept it and admit they were wrong (as I did with Jimmy). Instead they prefer to pretend to root for Purdy, but come out with the truth in spurts when he's struggling.

But yes, please continue to defend people who say Purdy is "trying his best" and will "have to prove it all over again next season." Comedy.

Actually Trey exposed Trey. If he had played well and hadn't been injured so soon then Brock may have never had the chance to play. Trey just wasn't ready for the NFL and may never be. Kyle saw what he saw in practice and realized that Trey wasn't going to be the QB they expected. He and John swallowed their pride and moved on. It's not an easy thing for GMs and HCs to admit they screwed p on their 1st round pick and then turn to Mr. Irrelevant to bail them out. Brock got his chance and made the most of it.

Was Trey not ready for the NFL, or was he injured too soon? Because you're saying both things simultaneously which is strange. The consensus was Trey needed time to develop, Kyle's scheme was complicated, etc. Well Purdy blew those excuses out of the water and made Trey expendable. Same with Jimmy (for different reasons).

What's strange about it? Both things can be equally true. He got injured twice which certainly kept him from developing but he also didn't look ready when he played. He hasn't seen the field yet in Dallas either.

Trey was the product of the Covid era when many players didn't play. The competition was weaker than it normally is in FCS football. He played one full season then took a year off. He was always a project but like so many young QBs he just didn't pan out. Kyle and John drafted him hoping his athleticism would take over and help him develop. Unfortunately it didn't. Brock has shown us that it takes way more than just athleticism. That doesn't mean Trey might not someday be a decent QB but it doesn't appear to be happening any time soon.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
I don't give a rat's ass about Jimmy, but you keep hiding behind that. You hate Purdy because he exposed Trey, and you're hoping for his downfall. You, ring, NY, and a few others. It's pathetic.

Brock didn't expose Trey. Brock exposed Jimmy.

Brock was miles better than both and that's why they are both gone now.

No one is rooting for Purdy to fail here.

Yes he exposed Jimmy as well. And of course he exposed Trey, why he got traded lol. Some just can't accept it and admit they were wrong (as I did with Jimmy). Instead they prefer to pretend to root for Purdy, but come out with the truth in spurts when he's struggling.

But yes, please continue to defend people who say Purdy is "trying his best" and will "have to prove it all over again next season." Comedy.

Actually Trey exposed Trey. If he had played well and hadn't been injured so soon then Brock may have never had the chance to play. Trey just wasn't ready for the NFL and may never be. Kyle saw what he saw in practice and realized that Trey wasn't going to be the QB they expected. He and John swallowed their pride and moved on. It's not an easy thing for GMs and HCs to admit they screwed p on their 1st round pick and then turn to Mr. Irrelevant to bail them out. Brock got his chance and made the most of it.

Was Trey not ready for the NFL, or was he injured too soon? Because you're saying both things simultaneously which is strange. The consensus was Trey needed time to develop, Kyle's scheme was complicated, etc. Well Purdy blew those excuses out of the water and made Trey expendable. Same with Jimmy (for different reasons).

What's strange about it? Both things can be equally true. He got injured twice which certainly kept him from developing but he also didn't look ready when he played. He hasn't seen the field yet in Dallas either.

Trey was the product of the Covid era when many players didn't play. The competition was weaker than it normally is in FCS football. He played one full season then took a year off. He was always a project but like so many young QBs he just didn't pan out. Kyle and John drafted him hoping his athleticism would take over and help him develop. Unfortunately it didn't. Brock has shown us that it takes way more than just athleticism. That doesn't mean Trey might not someday be a decent QB but it doesn't appear to be happening any time soon.

You said if Trey hadn't been injured so soon, then Brock may have never had the chance to play. But I see now you also said "if he had played well" as well. Which seems like an obvious point lol. Anyway, the bottom lie is Purdy exposed the limitations that the offense had because of Jimmy, and exposed how awful of a trade and pick Trey was. Not sure why anyone has an issue with either of those statements, unless they're more a fan of those players than the team (which is obviously the case for a few posters here).

Originally posted by mattster03:

Originally posted by JMyaer:
I know, I know who cares about the MVP award, but stil can someone make this make sense?

Player POS GP CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG YDS/G LNG TD INT SACKS YL QBR RTG WINS NOTES
Brock Purdy SF QB 16 308 444 69.4 4,280 9.6 267.5 76 31 11 28 153 72.7 113.0 12 #1 Seed NFC
Lamar Jackson BAL QB 16 307 457 67.2 3,678 8.0 229.9 80 24 7 37 218 65.3 102.7 13 #1 Seed AFC

Because 2 reasons:
1. You are not including rushing yards
2. Lamar won head to head late in the season and it was unfortunately Brocks worst game of the season, by far.
Based on passing stats alone, Brock would absolutely deserve MVP

1. Purdy's passing plus rushing total is 4,424 and total TD's is 33. Lamar's is 4,499 and 29.
2. Since when does one head to head game determine the MVP for the entire season?

Originally posted by YACBros85:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by JMyaer:
I know, I know who cares about the MVP award, but stil can someone make this make sense?

Player POS GP CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG YDS/G LNG TD INT SACKS YARDS LOST QBR RTG WINS NOTES
Brock Purdy SF QB 16 308 444 69.4 4,280 9.6 267.5 76 31 11 28 153 72.7 113.0 12 #1 Seed NFC
Lamar Jackson BAL QB 16 307 457 67.2 3,678 8.0 229.9 80 24 7 37 218 65.3 102.7 13 #1 Seed AFC

Good info. Cleaned it up a bit to see the stats and differences more clearly. Purdy is still the MVP in my mind, if you take the entire season into account.

Too bad MVP is a popularity contest and isn't actually based around facts.

This would be the only reason that Purdy doesn't win it.

"The 49ers have made a quarterback nobody else in the league wanted look like a superstar by surrounding him with stars"… This stupid narrative is so f**king lazy not to mention old & tired as hell. No dips**t, Brock Purdy has made himself look like a superstar by playing at an elite QB level. Of course he has great skill players surrounding him but he still has to get them the ball accurately and on time. All these moronic pundits refuse to mention him in the same breath as the Mahomes, Allens, Jacksons, or even Stafford's of the world because he wasn't a first round pick. Rubbish it's a crock of s**t.

Originally posted by ninerjok:
"The 49ers have made a quarterback nobody else in the league wanted look like a superstar by surrounding him with stars"… This stupid narrative is so f**king lazy not to mention old & tired as hell. No dips**t, Brock Purdy has made himself look like a superstar by playing at an elite QB level. Of course he has great skill players surrounding him but he still has to get them the ball accurately and on time. All these moronic pundits refuse to mention him in the same breath as the Mahomes, Allens, Jacksons, or even Stafford's of the world because he wasn't a first round pick. Rubbish it's a crock of s**t.

Yah nevermind LAR went out and got OBJ and Von Miller to put them over the top. But yah all Stafford. Oh look Mahomes has crap for weapons, why isn't he being talked about in the MVP race, I thought it was all Mahomes?? Josh Allen has been so inconsistent, nowhere near as good as what Brock Purdy has done this season.

f**k You Nick Wright.

Originally posted by Furlow:
1. Purdy's passing plus rushing total is 4,424 and total TD's is 33. Lamar's is 4,499 and 29.
2. Since when does one head to head game determine the MVP for the entire season?

Yes, this is a great point and absolutely ridiculous.....it's MVP not who among MVP candidates can beat each other head to head.

BTW, does anyone here hate Lamar Jackson as much as me?

He's inspiring the Russell Wilson type hatred in my soul.

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
BTW, does anyone here hate Lamar Jackson as much as me?

He's inspiring the Russell Wilson type hatred in my soul.

Why? Strictly his style of play? He seems like an awesome teammate on and off the field. He also seems to enjoy good banter with opposing players on the field. How can you not like that attitude?

Originally posted by Furlow:
Purdy is hands down better than Trey in every one of those aspects.

Sure. He's also better than Jimmy in everyone of those aspects. That's why he's the QB, not just because he takes the shots that are there.

Originally posted by 49erKing:

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
BTW, does anyone here hate Lamar Jackson as much as me?

He's inspiring the Russell Wilson type hatred in my soul.

Why? Strictly his style of play? He seems like an awesome teammate on and off the field. He also seems to enjoy good banter with opposing players on the field. How can you not like that attitude?

Of all people to respond and speak highly of a player from another team. Lol

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by JMyaer:
I know, I know who cares about the MVP award, but stil can someone make this make sense?

Player POS GP CMP ATT CMP% YDS AVG YDS/G LNG TD INT SACKS YARDS LOST QBR RTG WINS NOTES
Brock Purdy SF QB 16 308 444 69.4 4,280 9.6 267.5 76 31 11 28 153 72.7 113.0 12 #1 Seed NFC
Lamar Jackson BAL QB 16 307 457 67.2 3,678 8.0 229.9 80 24 7 37 218 65.3 102.7 13 #1 Seed AFC

Good info. Cleaned it up a bit to see the stats and differences more clearly. Purdy is still the MVP in my mind, if you take the entire season into account.

Purdy is still MVP to me also.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49erKing:

Originally posted by JTsBiggestFan:
BTW, does anyone here hate Lamar Jackson as much as me?

He's inspiring the Russell Wilson type hatred in my soul.

Why? Strictly his style of play? He seems like an awesome teammate on and off the field. He also seems to enjoy good banter with opposing players on the field. How can you not like that attitude?

Of all people to respond and speak highly of a player from another team. Lol

Considering how Zoners treat and talk to each other on this forum over the stupidest s**t...lmao.

Originally posted by 9ers4eva:

Originally posted by Furlow:
Purdy is hands down better than Trey in every one of those aspects.

Sure. He's also better than Jimmy in everyone of those aspects. That's why he's the QB, not just because he takes the shots that are there.

I already said he exposed Jimmy. Your issue was that I said he exposed Trey, which you disagreed with. And then proceeded to say that Purdy's only advantage over Trey was that he's "more ballsy."

Originally posted by Furlow:
Was Trey not ready for the NFL, or was he injured too soon? Because you're saying both things simultaneously which is strange. The consensus was Trey needed time to develop, Kyle's scheme was complicated, etc. Well Purdy blew those excuses out of the water and made Trey expendable. Same with Jimmy (for different reasons).

Both of those things can be true at the same time. I think the bottom line is that Lance simply wasn't ready to be an NFL QB and the injury put an end to any chance of that happening with the 49ers once Brock came along. After the Raiders preseason game last year, I wasn't convinced that Lance would ever be a quality starter in this league. Stranger things have happened, of course, but the various tape breakdowns that came out of that game were just brutal. He either doesn't recognize what he's seeing, or he sees it and, for whatever reason, is unwilling to pull the trigger. I mostly had a wait and see attitude about Lance, but he was terrible in that game and it's easy to see why Brock emerged as the starter. It ended up being a bad call with Lance, but that's the NFL. Go Niners!