49ers vs. Seahawks tickets available! →

There are 264 users in the forums

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online

QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
They view this as a hit piece but I don't think this would be that bad. We'd be 2x SB champs if we could defend a 3rd and 15 and catch an INT off the shoulder pads. If BP wants to put us up 10 in any NFC Champ games or SBs I'll take it and roll with whatever happens next. Give Hargrave & Bosa a 10 point lead late, we should be winning.

We'd be SB champs if our QB could read the field and hit a wide open WR all the same.

we all know Jimmy's stats in the 4th QR of the Super Bowl.

everyone wants to lean on the defense for everything. I'd like to lean on the QB for once when it really matters. We will see
[ Edited by NYniner85 on Jun 10, 2023 at 12:19 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
They view this as a hit piece but I don't think this would be that bad. We'd be 2x SB champs if we could defend a 3rd and 15 and catch an INT off the shoulder pads. If BP wants to put us up 10 in any NFC Champ games or SBs I'll take it and roll with whatever happens next. Give Hargrave & Bosa a 10 point lead late, we should be winning.

We'd be SB champs if our QB could read the field and hit a wide open QB WR all the same.

we all know Jimmy's stats in the 4th QR of the Super Bowl.

everyone wants to lean on the defense for everything. I'd like to lean on the QB for once when it really matters. We will see

Jimmie's overall play in the playoffs wasn't very good. It was actually disappointing. He wasn't necessarily "bad" but he didn't step up or get better in the playoffs. He struggled and it held us back. He did well enough for us to win but not well enough for us to win if we were in tough spots, which you constantly are in the playoffs.

Only one I cut him a break on is the rams game in the NFCC because he had a torn ligament in his throwing thumb, separated throwing shoulder, and our o line was getting obliterated by their d line. He still didn't play very good but I thought he did given his situation.

i really liked how Brock played in the playoffs. I thought he stepped up and played exactly how we needed him to, especially with it being his first rodeo and Dallas has a very good defense.
Originally posted by tankle104:
Jimmie's overall play in the playoffs wasn't very good. It was actually disappointing. He wasn't necessarily "bad" but he didn't step up or get better in the playoffs. He struggled and it held us back. He did well enough for us to win but not well enough for us to win if we were in tough spots, which you constantly are in the playoffs.

Only one I cut him a break on is the rams game in the NFCC because he had a torn ligament in his throwing thumb, separated throwing shoulder, and our o line was getting obliterated by their d line. He still didn't play very good but I thought he did given his situation.

i really liked how Brock played in the playoffs. I thought he stepped up and played exactly how we needed him to, especially with it being his first rodeo and Dallas has a very good defense.

Injuries for sure were an issue in the NFCC. He also didn't see the field well at all. I've posted a handful of missed reads, which doesn't have anything to do with being hurt … if he couldn't throw the ball to wide open guys, he shouldn't have been playing.

I remember you saying you can't say a QB played well unless it's for "at least" 3 QRs in a given game. He didn't play well vs Seattle for "at least" 3 QRs same with the Dallas game…it was also his first everything, so there's development that can happen for sure.
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

what a dumbass lol
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

what a dumbass lol

What's he wrong about? Explain please
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

what a dumbass lol

What's he wrong about? Explain please

-more athletic
-mr irrelevant
-ceiling unknown
Originally posted by tankle104:
Jimmie's overall play in the playoffs wasn't very good. It was actually disappointing. He wasn't necessarily "bad" but he didn't step up or get better in the playoffs. He struggled and it held us back. He did well enough for us to win but not well enough for us to win if we were in tough spots, which you constantly are in the playoffs.

Only one I cut him a break on is the rams game in the NFCC because he had a torn ligament in his throwing thumb, separated throwing shoulder, and our o line was getting obliterated by their d line. He still didn't play very good but I thought he did given his situation.

i really liked how Brock played in the playoffs. I thought he stepped up and played exactly how we needed him to, especially with it being his first rodeo and Dallas has a very good defense.

After investigation by a well informed poster it turned out Jimmy had 3.7 seconds to throw the ball on average in that game. It was his indecisiveness not the protection that was at issue. As NY stated there were multiple opportunitirs missed.

If we have Brock for that game judging by what we saw in last year's sample the 9ers win. Hopefully he will get that opportunity this year. Just build on last year and get better.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
We'd be SB champs if our QB could read the field and hit a wide open WR all the same.

we all know Jimmy's stats in the 4th QR of the Super Bowl.

everyone wants to lean on the defense for everything. I'd like to lean on the QB for once when it really matters. We will see

Be nice to score more.than 20 as well. Expecting elite offenses to be held under 20 is a big ask.
[ Edited by 9ers4eva on Jun 10, 2023 at 1:07 PM ]
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Jimmie's overall play in the playoffs wasn't very good. It was actually disappointing. He wasn't necessarily "bad" but he didn't step up or get better in the playoffs. He struggled and it held us back. He did well enough for us to win but not well enough for us to win if we were in tough spots, which you constantly are in the playoffs.

Only one I cut him a break on is the rams game in the NFCC because he had a torn ligament in his throwing thumb, separated throwing shoulder, and our o line was getting obliterated by their d line. He still didn't play very good but I thought he did given his situation.

i really liked how Brock played in the playoffs. I thought he stepped up and played exactly how we needed him to, especially with it being his first rodeo and Dallas has a very good defense.

Injuries for sure were an issue in the NFCC. He also didn't see the field well at all. I've posted a handful of missed reads, which doesn't have anything to do with being hurt … if he couldn't throw the ball to wide open guys, he shouldn't have been playing.

I remember you saying you can't say a QB played well unless it's for "at least" 3 QRs in a given game. He didn't play well vs Seattle for "at least" 3 QRs same with the Dallas game…it was also his first everything, so there's development that can happen for sure.

Yeah Jimmy struggled in the playoffs. What confused me is that the things he seemed to do well at, or at least serviceable in the regular season, he regressed at in the playoffs. I think Purdy like matched his stats and/or eclipsed them in one post season. Lol

Yeah but I was saying that as a general and I think the word "good" is subjective. Sometimes a qb can have average stats in a quarter or the team not score and it doesn't necessarily mean they didn't play well.

With the seattle game, he didn't have a good first quarter, for sure. Brock seemed nervous and I think he missed his first handful of easy passes and was late on a touchdown. I think his nerves were high. He started to settle down as the second quarter ended (if I remember correctly). Then he finished the game on a terror (several NFL records). Overall, no Brock didn't have 3+ good quarters of football but I wouldn't call the first half bad either. I think he was very good in the second half, so I look at it as an exception to me saying that. His first half misses were just that, poor throws, but he was reading everything right and not turning the ball over. It was just execution and he turned it around rather quickly. It wasn't something that continued on throughout the game.

the Dallas game, I think Dallas D played great. I thought they were fast, Vicious, and motivated. I was impressed. They made it a dog fight. Did Brock light it up? No, but when I look at the context of it all - playoff game, historic rival, great defense, rookie year erc.. I think he played damn good and came through when he was needed to. I give him a lot of credit for the mental aspect and staying steady to deliver when he was needed most. I wouldn't say he had a bad game at all. I also wouldn't say he had a great game. I think he had a damn good game within the context of it all.

since this usually leads to some sort of comparison with Lance, when it comes to his Texans game. I thought he played much better than he did against Arizona, much better. The reason why I say he had an okay game was it took him half way through the third to really get started. The offense struggled to really move the ball in general in the first half. This is against a bad bad team. He did finish strong, which I give him credit for. He got it together but when I look at it - 1.5 quarters of good play against a bottom team (only a couple teams put us less points than we did and they had one of the worst defenses). So, I think he showed improvement and got better as the game went on but the overall performance was very clunky until about halfway through the third. I wish they had a decent offense cause I'd like to of seen Trey in a situation where it's a close and the pressure is on down the stretch, instead of it not really close. Some may feel different than me, I'm fine with that. I just don't think it was a good game overall.
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

what a dumbass lol

What's he wrong about? Explain please


Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

what a dumbass lol

What's he wrong about? Explain please

He's wrong for many reasons. The short explanation is that Brock passes the eye test. Stats can be used to make whatever case you want.
Originally posted by DynastyPart2:
He's wrong for many reasons. The short explanation is that Brock passes the eye test. Stats can be used to make whatever case you want.

You mean like the majority of posts in here using stats ?
Originally posted by 49erF90:
I think the scouts of all the other teams have scouted Brock Purdy on paper only so they all decided that if ever Purdy is going to a team, it would be as an undrafted free agent. However, someone or a couple from the 49ers organization had done a remarkable (or above and beyond) due diligence before submitting their scouting report about an under the radar QB who can be "The One".

To each his own but meh,...I can't go with 1 last pick and claim a "remarkable job" where essentially, it was the last pick in the draft. I can start heading in that direction if they traded up to the 5th or even the 6th specifically for him. But the last pick of the draft -- I mean -- that's like dusting off the spare changing u have in your pocket and seeing what you can get out of a vending machine.

I think where they're doing a remarkable job is "Up And Down The Roster." The totality of things, they have certainly done well and we can tangibly see this, Purdy included.
Originally posted by DynastyPart2:
He's wrong for many reasons. The short explanation is that Brock passes the eye test. Stats can be used to make whatever case you want.

Everyone was claiming Jimmy was playing his best ball ever and then purdy in his first ever playing time matched it easily lol
[ Edited by DonnieDarko on Jun 10, 2023 at 11:32 PM ]
Originally posted by Hysterikal:


let the hate flow

Let the laughs flow...the guy ignores how scoring improved almost ten points a game, and how much more mobility improved at the qb position, and how much better Purdy is throwing outside the numbers, all as a rookie. He must be another one of those maroons who thinks that if the guy isn't at least 6'4" and has a cannon for an arm that they can't possibly be good.
[ Edited by Memphis9er on Jun 11, 2023 at 2:38 AM ]
Originally posted by DonnieDarko:
Everyone was claiming Jimmy was playing his best ball ever and then purdy in his first ever playing time matched it easily lol

This sums it up right here
Theme: Auto • LightDark
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone