QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

Yeah, I think it's just a matter of the right offer. If it's anything less than what the front office desires - it isn't worth it.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

No reason to trade a player that's a low sell point. If people aren't busting down our door with an offer we can't refuse, it makes way more sense to spread the chance of having a franchise QB between as many prospects as your salary cap and roster can fit. Trey has so much potential, why give him away for chump change, when he could turn out being the guy. FWIW, I think Brock has the inside track on being the guy, but stranger things have happened. TLDR, don't trade away your chances for a franchise QB before you already have one, 100% sure.

Originally posted by tankle104:
"The 49ers' expected starting quarterback should, well, continue to be expected to start for the team," Breer wrote. "He's on a very controlled throwing program now, and this week's minicamp in Santa Clara should provide more answers. As it stands? Purdy is throwing without pain, and he's passed every test the Niners have thrown at him."

As expected, the 49ers canceled the final week of organized team activities (OTAs), initially scheduled for this week, and replaced them by moving up their mandatory minicamp, which will now kick off on Tuesday. Obviously, Purdy will not participate. However, his very limited throwing sessions to evaluate his progress should continue.

"The plan going forward is to gradually increase the velocity and distance on his throws," Breer continued. "But at this point, I'm told he's come through the rehab process and is now building strength back in his arm, on a track that'd have him ready to go for Week 1."

😍😍😍😍

All good news

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

No reason to trade him unless it's for stupid compensation

Originally posted by NYniner85:
No reason to trade him unless it's for stupid compensation

I think we all know that's not coming.

The next consideration would be the money.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

No reason to trade him unless it's for stupid compensation

Absolutely no reason to trade him this year at all, probably not next year if he shows marked improvement.

Originally posted by Memphis9er:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Honestly if we didn't have cap ramifications, and Purdy turns out to be Him, his contract is so low I'd be salivating to trade Lance and Darnold and buy some top tier defenders.

But then reality sets in and I remember that you need more than one good QB or you're going to end up like the 49ers almost every year since 2018. Smh.

It's too bad. However we have Purdy for two more years beyond this season at a chump change contract, and if Trey doesn't show up, there's no reason to keep him at the escalating salary he'll have next year. So we should have a lot more space at that position. Unfortunately, we'll be giving that to Bosa.

Or Trey will make himself valuable and we'll keep him at least for the duration of his contract, but either way it's still less than what most teams are spending on QB.

But if Purdy is the guy, do we really need to spend 10 million on a back up QB? This year, you want Lance and Darnold. It's too late to get some veteran and train him, and there's still a chance Lance (or Darnold) will ascend. But next year, if that doesn't happen, it's time to move on. Assuming Purdy is the guy.

This isn't going to be something most people will like me saying, but I still believe there is a solid chance Trey gets traded. I'm not saying I want him to, I'm just saying business wise - it can make a lot of sense. Just requires some unknown variables to be figured out.

the sam darnold signing has always been strange to me. I know we've had a ton of injuries these last 5-6 years or so, but that's not normal. It's been horrible luck.

i think the plan is currently 1 of 2 things and it all depends on what someone offers for Trey. I think if we get a good offer, we take it. Roll into the season with Purdy, Darnold, & Allen. I think the fact that they're even giving darnold first team reps speaks a lot to that - he obviously wasn't brought in to be just QB3. If we don't get the offer, I think we roll into the season with all three and let the dominos fall how they fall.

I personally don't really care which direction we go in. I'll be bummed if anyone gets hurt. If we keep him, great. If we don't, great.

treys been getting a ton of positive publicity recentky and looks much improved. So I could see a team trading for him. It'll just depend on the offer.

i also don't buy that crap "we will trade anyone for the right price". That's just non sense. Lol we won't trade deebo, Aiyuk, CMC, Bosa, Warner, Williams, Purdy, Armstead, Huff, etc. we won't trade players who we believe are future cornerstones of the organization.

Well it's past June 1st so we'd actually gain cap room if we traded Trey. But doing so would depend on the offer received as well as how Trey looks.

No reason to trade him unless it's for stupid compensation

Absolutely no reason to trade him this year at all, probably not next year if he shows marked improvement.

Well, I don't agree with that entirely. If Purdy comes out looking like a Pro Bowl and we're offered a first or more for Trey, I think that's a good enough reason to do it.

Originally posted by NYniner85:
There was reports they were gonna bench Jimmy if they lost vs the Bears. Deebo's long TD saved his season. Yeah and investment…his contract was FGTD in 2021 if on the active roster. He was one of the highest paid players in the league that yr (straight cash/not cap hit).

who was he replacing with Hoyer? A day 3 QB rookie?

like I said he's not gonna give any of these dudes a full season of ups and downs on a Super Bowl roster…if a QB loses a couple games he's gonna end up on the butt bench. Why would he not?

I was specifically respnding to you saying that Kyle wouldn't ride with Purdy through a couple of bad games.

Here is what you said about Purdy I disagreed with

I disagree this is how Kyle is thinking…if he plays bad a couple games they aren't gonna let him develop through that. They should….but they've shown they ain't gonna let that s**t happen. He will get benched and whomever is next up will get a shot.

Purdy has equity having won. Shanahan didnt bench Jimmy 2 years ago when Jimmy started out 2-4 and all signs point to Kyle liking Purdy more than Jimmy.

Originally posted by KiwiM3:

Originally posted by NYniner85:
There was reports they were gonna bench Jimmy if they lost vs the Bears. Deebo's long TD saved his season. Yeah and investment…his contract was FGTD in 2021 if on the active roster. He was one of the highest paid players in the league that yr (straight cash/not cap hit).

who was he replacing with Hoyer? A day 3 QB rookie?

like I said he's not gonna give any of these dudes a full season of ups and downs on a Super Bowl roster…if a QB loses a couple games he's gonna end up on the butt bench. Why would he not?

I was specifically respnding to you saying that Kyle wouldn't ride with Purdy through a couple of bad games.

Here is what you said about Purdy I disagreed with

I disagree this is how Kyle is thinking…if he plays bad a couple games they aren't gonna let him develop through that. They should….but they've shown they ain't gonna let that s**t happen. He will get benched and whomever is next up will get a shot.

Purdy has equity having won. Shanahan didnt bench Jimmy 2 years ago when Jimmy started out 2-4 and all signs point to Kyle liking Purdy more than Jimmy.

Rumors indicate he was one game away from benching Jimmy.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Rumors indicate he was one game away from benching Jimmy.

49ers would have been 2-5 if Jimmy had lost (5 straight losses)

That's different from a couple of bad games.

He rode with Jimmy through 4 straight losses.

Originally posted by KiwiM3:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Rumors indicate he was one game away from benching Jimmy.

49ers would have been 2-5 if Jimmy had lost (5 straight losses)

That's different from a couple of bad games.

He rode with Jimmy through 4 straight losses.

Yes, that is correct. I'm not saying two games and Purdy gets benched, the other guy was. But he doesn't have an infinite leash, and how long that leash is depends on how well Trey and Sam are doing in camp and in the pre-season.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Rumors indicate he was one game away from benching Jimmy.

Which made perfect sense at the time. They were 3-5, and if they had lost to the Rams they would have been 3-6 and 0-3 in the division. Chances of making the playoffs would have been effectively zero.

Perfect opportunity to get the young raw guy in for meaningful playing time that wouldn't come at the cost of the team goals for the season.

crazy how a mr irrelevant will supplant a 3rd overall pick

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Yes, that is correct. I'm not saying two games and Purdy gets benched, the other guy was. But he doesn't have an infinite leash, and how long that leash is depends on how well Trey and Sam are doing in camp and in the pre-season.

Yep I agree with that