Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by Bangbang89:
Glad Brock is on track but hate that apparently he's been anointed qb1. Yes he did play well last year but we've seen that all happen before. And then they end up not playing so well later on down the line. Not a fan of one single player, I'm a fan of the 49ers. I would like to see what lance would look like for 5 games straight. I just hope they're not rushing Brock back.
Just curious, if the team went 2-3 in that five-game stretch, will you consider that experiment to have been worthwhile?
If Lance has a QB rating of -1.0 but the team is 5-0, would that be a reason to continue playing Lance? I don't think so. Don't look at win/loss records when evaluating quarterbacks.
Well, if the team is 5-0 I think it would be pretty difficult for Lance to have a QB rating of -1. so I'm not sure that's a very serious hypothetical. If they are 5-0 he must have been doing something right. If they were 5-0 and he had a passer rating in the 70's and was completing less than 60% of his passes than that would certainly be something to look at. I think what I was really getting at was, given the slim margins we have seen in the last few years in the difference between making the playoffs and missing them, would those three losses, which might have an impact on whether or not the team were able to make the playoffs, be worth losing another year out of our current Super Bowl window, just so we can see how Lance develops? I suspect that's the question the team will be asking itself going into this season. Of course, there is also the possibility that Lance completely balls out and relegates Purdy to the role of best back-up in the league. Not sure that would be the case unless there is a setback with Brock's elbow, but stranger things have happened.
[ Edited by 49ers81 on Jun 1, 2023 at 9:11 AM ]