QB Brock Purdy Thread

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

Well the OL/pass blocking had/has it's problems. Hence why we used 4 QB's last season. But the correct analogy would be "us guys" now saying that the OL is awesome and that's why Purdy did so well - as a way of minimizing Purdy.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

some on here will blame literally everything but the player for the poor performance. Then some will blame the player when it's not entirely their fault.

like it's clear who favors Lance, because nothing will be lances fault and they'll talk about the 5-10 decent plays he has had of 100 total play. They'll say all of lances poor plays have been everyone else's fault, including the weather.

then it's clear who hated jimmy because they blame him for everything too. Lol

fact is, it's a mixture of a lot of things. Some of treys poor play is to blame on things like injury, weather etc. doesn't change the fact he still played poorly himself too. He's partially to blame.

fact is, jimmy did make bonehead mistakes and had limitations. He was still a really good qb but some losses and lost seasons are partially to blame on his limitations.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

Well the OL/pass blocking had/has it's problems. Hence why we used 4 QB's last season. But the correct analogy would be "us guys" now saying that the OL is awesome and that's why Purdy did so well - as a way of minimizing Purdy.

Yeah no. Trey got hurt on a QB power. Jimmy got hurt because he held on to the ball and tried to make an off-schedule play. Purdy got hurt because a tight end got beat.

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

some on here will blame literally everything but the player for the poor performance. Then some will blame the player when it's not entirely their fault.

like it's clear who favors Lance, because nothing will be lances fault and they'll talk about the 5-10 decent plays he has had of 100 total play. They'll say all of lances poor plays have been everyone else's fault, including the weather.

then it's clear who hated jimmy because they blame him for everything too. Lol

fact is, it's a mixture of a lot of things. Some of treys poor play is to blame on things like injury, weather etc. doesn't change the fact he still played poorly himself too. He's partially to blame.

fact is, jimmy did make bonehead mistakes and had limitations. He was still a really good qb but some losses and lost seasons are partially to blame on his limitations.

This is reasonable. I'd say regarding Trey some of the comments are that he was known to be raw and has not had the opportunity to develop—and everyone knew he'd need time to do so.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
This is reasonable. I'd say regarding Trey some of the comments are that he was known to be raw and has not had the opportunity to develop—and everyone knew he'd need time to do so.

Time to develop into a great/elite QB? Absolutely.

Time to develop into a functional QB that we could continue to develop while playing and still reach team goals? I think that's a different story.

I look back at reports at the time that the 49ers believed Trey was more ready to play than Mac Jones. Are those reports true? Hard to say for certain, but it would make a lot more sense with us choosing him in the first place. There were obviously fans who felt this way.

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:

He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Jimmy isn't on the team and this is the Brock thread.
I never chose any qb.

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:

He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

What reason is that?

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

What reason is that?

I mean, is it really that hard to piece together? Lol. Because people latch onto a player and become more fans of that player than the team. You notice some of the most ardent Jimmy cultists are gone? They have made accounts on the Raiders forums. Just like if/when Trey leaves, I suspect guys like NDSU are going to follow him to his new team.

He still needs to get through the throwing reps without having any setbacks. It looks like he is a week ahead of schedule when it comes to start throwing a football but he still has to get through the session without any issues.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Not me.

And the fact that you are calling NY a "Jimmy fan" now is absurd.

Good news he can start throwing next week. Just don't rush the kid, let him get 100%

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

Well the OL/pass blocking had/has it's problems. Hence why we used 4 QB's last season. But the correct analogy would be "us guys" now saying that the OL is awesome and that's why Purdy did so well - as a way of minimizing Purdy.

Yeah no. Trey got hurt on a QB power. Jimmy got hurt because he held on to the ball and tried to make an off-schedule play. Purdy got hurt because a tight end got beat.

The OL/pass blocking has had issues protecting QB's during the Kyle Shanahan era. FACT.

Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Not me.

And the fact that you are calling NY a "Jimmy fan" now is absurd.

As it relates to trying to downplay Purdy, yes he's a "fan." Speaks highly of. Gives praise to. Whatever words/phrases make you feel warm and fuzzy and not triggered and depressed. Good lord.

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:

Originally posted by Furlow:

Originally posted by 49ers808:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Furlow:
He's right about what? Jimmy's advanced stats in one game were equal to or better than Purdy's over a 7-8 game stretch? What kind of comparison is that? Not to mention, it was ridiculously obvious how much better Purdy was than Jimmy.

But this is where we are. The Trey fans are so hell bent on minimizing Purdy, they are now embracing and lifting up Jimmy to attempt to make that happen. Lol it's funny at this point.

One game? I'm talking about his last 4 starts with CMC. Jimmy's numbers were legit good.

why do you ya'll resort to "Lance fans" or "Brock haters"? That's childish s**t imo. I'm in the Brock thread talking about Brock. If we're gonna go down that road why are you minimizing what Jimmy did with CMC his last 4 starts. Last I checked completing 73% of your passes, having a QB rating of 113.5, avg 230 yards and having 8 TDs to zero INTs in 4 games was pretty freaking good. Or do those kind of stats only apply to Brock?

What is your point here?

His point is that you and Furlow are no longer choosing Jimmy

Correct! Purdy > Jimmy. What I'm trying to figure out is why Jimmy haters (who wanted Trey to play instead) have now become Jimmy fans (as a way to minimize Purdy).

Tbh, same reason you guys minimized the offensive line to elevate Jimmy.

Well the OL/pass blocking had/has it's problems. Hence why we used 4 QB's last season. But the correct analogy would be "us guys" now saying that the OL is awesome and that's why Purdy did so well - as a way of minimizing Purdy.

Yeah no. Trey got hurt on a QB power. Jimmy got hurt because he held on to the ball and tried to make an off-schedule play. Purdy got hurt because a tight end got beat.

The OL/pass blocking has had issues protecting QB's during the Kyle Shanahan era. FACT.

It got better through the years, going from a 30.8% pressure rating in 2018 to a 15.5% pressure rate last year. Fact.