There are 604 users in the forums

What will Jimmy's trade value be in the offseason?

Shop Find 49ers gear online

What will Jimmy's trade value be in the offseason?

Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Originally posted by okdkid:

Colts from one douche bag to another.

Shows you exactly how highly they think of Jimmy.

Or they're trying to drive down the 49ers' asking price.

I'll say this though: back when I was convinced there's no way Jimmy would be back to back up Trey (assuming he stayed and Trey beat him out in a fair competition), that was when I was very sure that some team in the NFL actually wanted Jimmy. All this news has made me question that. But, again, it could just be the Colts want Jimmy for cheap and the 49ers refuse to get less than a second+.

Man, this has me looking at every angle now.

1. ShanaLynch clear cap room and we're done with FA which is pretty standard for us around this time. No need to cut him. Use the 3rd round comp next year as the starting point for a trade. Jimmy vs. Trey and the group will be deep regardless. Jimmy sees there isn't much out there so he stays and competes.
2. Colts connecting to every QB to drive the cost down, buy time for the medicals and hope for a 49ers cut knowing Jimmy is interested there from the trade talks and the Colts can get him at their cost without giving up trade compensation.
3. Draft-day trade option. After the draft teams want their guy in house for OTA's in April learning the offense. A team that doesn't get their QB could come calling.
4. Injuries. Hold Jimmy until a playoff team loses their starter and is desperate.

Cutting him post free agency makes no sense now. The FA deals that are out there now should be modest at best. One simple restructure should be able to clear enough room for any FA and the draft class while keeping Jimmy on the roster. Jimmy won't make waves given he's been involved in every talk throughout and knows the market out there. Here, he gets to at least compete for a starting spot while still making $25M.

I have no idea which scenario plays out in the end. Let me know if I missed any others.

If I were them, the only reasonable solution is to keep him and try to trade him until he gets a clear bill of health, and then cut your loses and cut him or trade him for next to nothing to a team he definitely doesn't want to go to. We lose the 3rd, yes, but that's assuming we'd even get a third. No one seems to want him. Maybe next year when his market value is much lower than his current salary, maybe we'd get the comp pick.

But the reason I'd just cut him or trade him to a Lions, is because it's pretty clear Yee and him deliberately timed this surgery to f**k over the 49ers (well, rather, to get Jimmy his guaranteed 7.5 million, but that does f**k over the 49ers). IMHO, this organization cannot let players' agents get away with that crap. Make Yee look like a fool to Jimmy by cutting Jimmy when every team already has their QB depth chart set, saving the 7.5 million, and then use that money to immediately extend our two guys.

cut jimmy? That is completely off the table -- due to the last 5 days. Talk about throwing away $20m -- the extra 20m we would have to pay to to replace jimmy with another similar talent we would complain about endlessly. LOL.
The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
We made that move, though. The trade to get Lance was the move to get us over the hump because Jimmy was the guy holding us back.

but it means little if you keep this current wretched o line in tact and roll with it for this year.. we were also told they would surround trey with great talent.. the team still needs a running back. a second tight end cuz kittle is unreliable. a fast wide out. the team has been wonderful in fixing special teams but we still have jimmy. we have a wretched offensive line. gotta take care of those things. a get over the hump qb means little if you got him behind a nickle and dime o line

Our offensive line was at worst average at pass protection last year. We did just lose Tomlinson though.

Nope. Much worse in various stats. We really need to prioritize pass pro now -- for either trey or healed up jimmy -- with no real home run hitter to spice up our outside zone game anymore.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
cut jimmy? That is completely off the table -- due to the last 5 days. Talk about throwing away $20m -- the extra 20m we would have to pay to to replace jimmy with another similar talent we would complain about endlessly. LOL.

Huh? Did I miss something? Is there suddenly a 20m dead cap hit if he gets cut?
Originally posted by hummbabybear:
Here are the teams with bottom tier QBs and their early draft picks
  • 2 Detroit Lions Jared Goff
  • 5 New York Giants Daniel Jones
  • 6 Carolina Panthers Sam Darnold - if they don't trade for Baker/JimmyG might take a QB at this spot
  • 9 Seattle Seahawks Drew Lock - if they don't trade for Baker might take a QB at this spot
  • 13 Houston Texans Davis Mills
  • 15/16 Philadelphia Eagles Jalen Hurts - Eagles might take a QB at this spot
  • 18 New Orleans Saints Taysom Hill - if they don't trade for Baker/JimmyG might take a QB at this spot
  • 19 Philadelphia Eagles Jalen Hurts - Eagles might take a QB at this spot
  • 20 Pittsburgh Steelers Mitchell Trubisky - Steelers might take a QB at this spot
  • 29 Miami Dolphins Tua Tagovailoa
  • 32/34 Detroit Lions Jared Goff - Lions might take a QB at this spot
  • 36 New York Giants Daniel Jones - Giants might take a QB at this spot
  • 42 Indianapolis Colts Sam Ehlinger
Colts are looking at this and it's not looking good to draft one of the top 5 QBs, plus all are arguably developmental QBs. If they don't like Baker, then they gotta overpay for JimmyG.

Well done, and thanks.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
cut jimmy? That is completely off the table -- due to the last 5 days. Talk about throwing away $20m -- the extra 20m we would have to pay to to replace jimmy with another similar talent we would complain about endlessly. LOL.

Huh? Did I miss something? Is there suddenly a 20m dead cap hit if he gets cut?

who is going to be our "back up"? bargain basement mariota type retread? or a known winner? I know, blake bortles for 4.5.
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:
Nobody gonna pick up that bloated contract

Aaron Rodgers highest paid year is $54 million. Jimmy G is less than half price. They can also extend him 1 more year for 2 total. Potentially lowering his cap hit. The team negotiating with him.

Lol at comparing rodgers to jimmy that's like comparing a lambo to a pinto

You missed it completely. That wasn't the point at all. The point is he is less than 1/2 price of big free agent QB'S. Hardly a big contract now a days.

1/2 the price for less than 1/2 the performance.

Rodgers has 85 TDs and 9 Ints over the last 2 seasons. During that same timespan Jimmy has 27 TDs and 17 Ints.

Jimmy G pretty routinely beats Rodgers in the playoffs.

He'll be with the team until he isn't. They'll get something for him or they won't. Until either of those things happen everything else is just noise.
Originally posted by 49ers81:
He'll be with the team until he isn't. They'll get something for him or they won't. Until either of those things happen everything else is just noise.

Haha. Awesome. Did you get that from a source?
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
who is going to be our "back up"? bargain basement mariota type retread? or a known winner? I know, blake bortles for 4.5.

Um, they just paid Nate Sudfeld a bunch of guaranteed money that you pay a backup, not a third string QB who is on PS
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
He'll be with the team until he isn't. They'll get something for him or they won't. Until either of those things happen everything else is just noise.

Haha. Awesome. Did you get that from a source?

Booger McFarland

Um, they just paid Nate Sudfeld a bunch of guaranteed money that you pay a backup, not a third string QB who is on PS

That was 2 weeks ago. Ancient history.
[ Edited by brodiebluebanaszak on Mar 20, 2022 at 12:20 PM ]
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Um, they just paid Nate Sudfeld a bunch of guaranteed money that you pay a backup, not a third string QB who is on PS

That was 2 weeks ago. Ancient history.
Because it was 2 weeks ago, the money doesn't become non-guaranteed.
You really proposing they keep Jimmy as a backup at 25+ m and also waste the money on sudfeld ? LOL
[ Edited by the_dynasty on Mar 20, 2022 at 12:26 PM ]
Originally posted by JR80Forever:
Am I the only one who thinks that the longer Jimmy is here, the longer it impacts Trey?

Be done with this already and move on. Jimmy isn't worth whatever John/Kyle think he is clearly.

If I was Jed I would have told those 2 to take the best offer at the start of the league year and be done with it. Start the new year off fresh.

Not worried about Trey AT ALL. He is the one guy who seems to have his head on straight. he'll find his way through the s**t show. It's the webzone that will lose it.

Look at the up side -- everyone posting here has a built in excuse for next year if we don't get to the big show.

It's all jimmy's fault, holding back our genius coach. grrr. grrr.
[ Edited by brodiebluebanaszak on Mar 20, 2022 at 12:29 PM ]
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:

Um, they just paid Nate Sudfeld a bunch of guaranteed money that you pay a backup, not a third string QB who is on PS

That was 2 weeks ago. Ancient history.
Because it was 2 weeks ago, the money doesn't become non-guaranteed.
You really proposing they keep Jimmy as a backup at 25+ m and also waste the money on sudfeld ? LOL

Times change. Yes jimmy will be the "backup" at "25m."

We'll see what the two sides work out so we can bring some stability to our all pro's.

That's the big picture.
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
We made that move, though. The trade to get Lance was the move to get us over the hump because Jimmy was the guy holding us back.

but it means little if you keep this current wretched o line in tact and roll with it for this year.. we were also told they would surround trey with great talent.. the team still needs a running back. a second tight end cuz kittle is unreliable. a fast wide out. the team has been wonderful in fixing special teams but we still have jimmy. we have a wretched offensive line. gotta take care of those things. a get over the hump qb means little if you got him behind a nickle and dime o line

Our offensive line was at worst average at pass protection last year. We did just lose Tomlinson though.

Nope. Much worse in various stats. We really need to prioritize pass pro now -- for either trey or healed up jimmy -- with no real home run hitter to spice up our outside zone game anymore.

And Jimmy was bottom ten in the NFL in INT%. Does that mean he was the tenth worst QB? In the one stat that directly measures pass protection (pass block win rate), we were 14th.
[ Edited by 5_Golden_Rings on Mar 20, 2022 at 12:31 PM ]
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone