Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 719 users in the forums

Niners trade for #3 overall

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by Niners99:
We just traded three 1sts and a 3rd to take the 3rd ranked QB in the class. Better be right about him.

2 firsts but whose counting?

No. It is 3 first even if you're swapping firsts it still counts as a first

Basic math. If you give up 3 and gain 1 the net is 2.

why do you have to explain this? god damn our education system sucks
He's right.

3 firsts plus a 3rd for a rookie qb. Why is that not right? Let's say miami drafted trey lance at #3. The 49ers give up #12 2021, 2022 1st and 2023 1st and 2021 for trey lance. That's three firsts and a third for trey lance. Why is that hard to understand.

Lol. The extra wording isn't going to make you right. It's 2 firsts homie

Tell me how I'm wrong.

2021 1st
2021 3rd
2022 1st
2023 1st

For

Mac Jones

That is 3 firsts and a 3rd for Mac jones. If it's mac jones.

Bro! We gave up 3 total 1sts. We received 1 first. 3-1=2.

Please stop. You're making yourself look bad

Lol, how do people not understand we gave them our #12 and they gave us their #3?

THEYRE STILL USING A FIRST ON A QB. AND they gave up 2 additional firsts. THAT is 3. One two three.

That's using three first round picks and a 3rd for a rookie qb. the original poster was saying just that. they used 3 firsts and a 3rd. Let that register.

The above videos are auto-populated by an affiliate.
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Wait so the niners gave next years third or this years ? Some reports are saying both.

This year.

It's next years.
Originally posted by Giedi:
Yup, that's the Franchise QB is a position you *have* to pay through the nose to solidify. I don't think it's Mac Jones either, because Kyle already has Jimmy to be Mac Jones. If I was Kyle, I'd love to have a dynamic athlete (a Steve Young kind of talent) to sit behind a pocket QB in Jimmy. Specially if the rookie is a guy that can pass *and* run like Steve. Those kinds of players are extremely rare and you have to spend what you need to spend to get a shot at talents like that. The gamble is what if the rookie is a bust? Well that's 40% chance of that happening so what, it's 100% fail if you don't take the chance. But the upside is more intriguing. If you can get a guy that can pass and run, that's a QB that is pretty much unstoppable if he has good players surrounding him.

Jimmy took them to the Super Bowl in 2019. That's not 100% fail. Hit Sanders on the deep pass. That's far from certain failure.
  • thl408
  • Moderator
  • Posts: 33,298
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by Niners99:
We just traded three 1sts and a 3rd to take the 3rd ranked QB in the class. Better be right about him.

2 firsts but whose counting?

No. It is 3 first even if you're swapping firsts it still counts as a first

Basic math. If you give up 3 and gain 1 the net is 2.

why do you have to explain this? god damn our education system sucks
He's right.

3 firsts plus a 3rd for a rookie qb. Why is that not right? Let's say miami drafted trey lance at #3. The 49ers give up #12 2021, 2022 1st and 2023 1st and 2021 for trey lance. That's three firsts and a third for trey lance. Why is that hard to understand.

Lol. The extra wording isn't going to make you right. It's 2 firsts homie

Tell me how I'm wrong.

2021 1st
2021 3rd
2022 1st
2023 1st

For

Mac Jones

That is 3 firsts and a 3rd for Mac jones. If it's mac jones.

Bro! We gave up 3 total 1sts. We received 1 first. 3-1=2.

Please stop. You're making yourself look bad

Lol, how do people not understand we gave them our #12 and they gave us their #3?

THEYRE STILL USING A FIRST ON A QB. AND they gave up 2 additional firsts. THAT is 3. One two three.

That's using three first round picks and a 3rd for a rookie qb. the original poster was saying just that. they used 3 firsts and a 3rd. Let that register.

This whole exchange
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by Niners99:
We just traded three 1sts and a 3rd to take the 3rd ranked QB in the class. Better be right about him.

2 firsts but whose counting?

No. It is 3 first even if you're swapping firsts it still counts as a first

Basic math. If you give up 3 and gain 1 the net is 2.

why do you have to explain this? god damn our education system sucks
He's right.

3 firsts plus a 3rd for a rookie qb. Why is that not right? Let's say miami drafted trey lance at #3. The 49ers give up #12 2021, 2022 1st and 2023 1st and 2021 for trey lance. That's three firsts and a third for trey lance. Why is that hard to understand.

Lol. The extra wording isn't going to make you right. It's 2 firsts homie

Tell me how I'm wrong.

2021 1st
2021 3rd
2022 1st
2023 1st

For

Mac Jones

That is 3 firsts and a 3rd for Mac jones. If it's mac jones.

Bro! We gave up 3 total 1sts. We received 1 first. 3-1=2.

Please stop. You're making yourself look bad

Lol, how do people not understand we gave them our #12 and they gave us their #3?

THEYRE STILL USING A FIRST ON A QB. AND they gave up 2 additional firsts. THAT is 3. One two three.

That's using three first round picks and a 3rd for a rookie qb. the original poster was saying just that. they used 3 firsts and a 3rd. Let that register.

People are confusing "trading" vs. "giving up". Niners are trading 3 firsts, but giving up 2. The original post said "trading" so 3 is the correct number for that word. /discussion
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Wait so the niners gave next years third or this years ? Some reports are saying both.

This year.

It's next years.

Lol that's what the NFL page on Instagram says too
Originally posted by mattster03:
People are confusing "trading" vs. "giving up". Niners are trading 3 firsts, but giving up 2. The original post said "trading" so 3 is the correct number for that word. /discussion

Before you cry and say it's because we traded 3 firsts, try thinking about what we gained. Then when you post you can say we gave up 2 firsts and next years third for the number 3 pick this year. And then when you finally use the words two firsts instead of three, you will finally be correct
  • pdc20
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,242
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by DASeiler49:
Originally posted by WINiner:
I really don't want Lance or Jones @3. If we made this trade intending to draft one of those 2 I'm disappointed and think Shanahan has shown yet again an inability to properly grade QB's.

You not wanting someone equates to Shanahan improperly grading QBs. No offense bro, I will take his opinion over yours.

Shanahan liked Beathard more than Mahomes, so let's not go crazy

Yeah sure.
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Wait so the niners gave next years third or this years ? Some reports are saying both.

This year.

It's next years.

Lol that's what the NFL page on Instagram says too

Next year's 3rd round comp pick for losing . . . Mayhew to WFT?
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
i think he's got the most off-script arm talent.

my biggest worry is his some of his measurables, like hand size and his overall size.

Lance is obviously the most raw and has higher bust potential because of that, but possibly the highest upside out of everyone in this draft.

Mac is just never going to be able to do the things that Wilson, Fields, or Lance can do, but if his football IQ is that high to go with his above average arm strength, but great accuracy, he can be the best player in this class

but Fields for me is the safest one. he checks out on the measurables, played against elite competition and dominated games at times against said competition. has really high upside as well because of his athletic ability, to go along with a very good NFL arm. my only worry with him is his personality. i want my QBs to have some Brady/Rivers in them, and he's much more quiet and a lead by example type of guy.

Great synopsis.

At the end of the season, before the pro days the top 3 QBs were Lawrence, Wilson and Fields... it only makes sense to take whoever is left at 3. Jones has too many perceived limitations and Lance is too raw to risk it all on.
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by Niners99:
We just traded three 1sts and a 3rd to take the 3rd ranked QB in the class. Better be right about him.

2 firsts but whose counting?

No. It is 3 first even if you're swapping firsts it still counts as a first

Basic math. If you give up 3 and gain 1 the net is 2.

why do you have to explain this? god damn our education system sucks
He's right.

3 firsts plus a 3rd for a rookie qb. Why is that not right? Let's say miami drafted trey lance at #3. The 49ers give up #12 2021, 2022 1st and 2023 1st and 2021 for trey lance. That's three firsts and a third for trey lance. Why is that hard to understand.

Lol. The extra wording isn't going to make you right. It's 2 firsts homie

Tell me how I'm wrong.

2021 1st
2021 3rd
2022 1st
2023 1st

For

Mac Jones

That is 3 firsts and a 3rd for Mac jones. If it's mac jones.

Bro! We gave up 3 total 1sts. We received 1 first. 3-1=2.

Please stop. You're making yourself look bad

Lol, how do people not understand we gave them our #12 and they gave us their #3?

THEYRE STILL USING A FIRST ON A QB. AND they gave up 2 additional firsts. THAT is 3. One two three.

That's using three first round picks and a 3rd for a rookie qb. the original poster was saying just that. they used 3 firsts and a 3rd. Let that register.

This whole exchange

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Actually he's the Mac Jones of this class


Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by badguy_1:
I think the debate is between Justin Fields and Mac Jones with Mac having a slight edge in 49ers mind. I don't see Shanahan taking a chance on a FCS guy.

Not it's not.

it's Lance or Fields.


Kyle's BFF disagrees. And now has no reason to not be honest since nobody can jump in front of the 49ers.



Simms is a dolt, i've lost all respect. Jones is a Garoppolo clone and they're keeping Garoppolo.

The reason you'd keep Jimmy G is because you want the rookie to sit, which is smart, which is what Kyle has referred to in praising the Alex/Pat M model.

If they cut Jimmy G and draft Jones then i'm out until that dude is hoisting lombardis!

But I really believe this is Fields or Lance and keeping JG.

Please let it be Fields.
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by mattster03:
Originally posted by Howlett49:
Originally posted by Niners99:
We just traded three 1sts and a 3rd to take the 3rd ranked QB in the class. Better be right about him.

2 firsts but whose counting?

No. It is 3 first even if you're swapping firsts it still counts as a first

Basic math. If you give up 3 and gain 1 the net is 2.

why do you have to explain this? god damn our education system sucks
He's right.

3 firsts plus a 3rd for a rookie qb. Why is that not right? Let's say miami drafted trey lance at #3. The 49ers give up #12 2021, 2022 1st and 2023 1st and 2021 for trey lance. That's three firsts and a third for trey lance. Why is that hard to understand.

Lol. The extra wording isn't going to make you right. It's 2 firsts homie

Tell me how I'm wrong.

2021 1st
2021 3rd
2022 1st
2023 1st

For

Mac Jones

That is 3 firsts and a 3rd for Mac jones. If it's mac jones.

Bro! We gave up 3 total 1sts. We received 1 first. 3-1=2.

Please stop. You're making yourself look bad

Lol, how do people not understand we gave them our #12 and they gave us their #3?

THEYRE STILL USING A FIRST ON A QB. AND they gave up 2 additional firsts. THAT is 3. One two three.

That's using three first round picks and a 3rd for a rookie qb. the original poster was saying just that. they used 3 firsts and a 3rd. Let that register.


Wait... How is moving up 9 spots giving up a pick?(not directed at you Steve)
[ Edited by OneNDone on Mar 26, 2021 at 3:11 PM ]
Originally posted by SonocoNinerFan:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Originally posted by AceDuce49:
Originally posted by SFrush:
Originally posted by jersey49er:
Wait so the niners gave next years third or this years ? Some reports are saying both.

This year.

It's next years.

Lol that's what the NFL page on Instagram says too

Next year's 3rd round comp pick for losing . . . Mayhew to WFT?

https://www.instagram.com/p/CM5AVtWnci1/?igshid=4pl5sbopvxnj
Originally posted by Hopper:


Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Kyle's BFF disagrees. And now has no reason to not be honest since nobody can jump in front of the 49ers.



I am thinking this too. Like it or not. I dont see them moving up for Lance (project) or Fields (OSU does not develop NFL QBs). I hope they keep JG around for a year. They wanted depth at QB.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone