Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by NinerGM:
Originally posted by NCommand:
The best C's are on the FA market (rare). Nah, we good.
#MoneyBall
The center from the Raiders would have been the better choice for a long term solution. This move was a done deal the moment Mack was told he wasn't coming back. Older, cheaper and a perfect scheme fit - that's our wheelhouse, or what Paraag is comfortable signing without much resistance. This isn't a negative take, we just know Paraag has a type of player he likes: mid-tier, older or a player with some injuries who can outplay his contract. I guess by definition that is #moneyball.
No hate, it's just that you have to limit the number of those players on a team.
And it's not a poor approach IF you still draft the youth that's just as talented to be trained by the Sherman's and Mack's and Sanders' of the world.
But let's say the you pay him $6M and use a 2nd/3rd rounder. That's getting up to $8-9M with two resources used and no guarantee that rookie ever reaches Mack production and talent.
Just pay the $12M and get a known all pro C for the next 5 years. I have this philosophy for the PRIME positions in this system LT, C, ER x2, etc
That's a good plan, I would have agreed, but for Alex Mack. He knows the system, no need to train him up in training camp. He knows Kyle. He knows the protections calls (ie more than just the system, he knows about the way Kyle thinks about the system). He's also going to coach the rest of the Olinemen while on the field. He's an older player, and so his cap hit isn't that big vs a young 25 year old in the prime of his career (who *doesn't* know Kyle's system and who doesn't know Kyle and how he play calls). And, for the price of a young top of the line 25 year old center, you can additionally draft a lower round raw, but talented center that has as much potential to be a first rounder but for the raw-ness in the third or lower rounds or later to sit behind Mack for a year as your long term solution.