Originally posted by genus49:
Originally posted by Typecast:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by genus49:
I would absolutely lose it if after we release his ass(hopefully right before week 1 if he ever even shows up) Washington never signs him and/or NFL hits them with tampering.
This should be tampering IMO, we got hit for way less with Lance Briggs but the NFL won't do anything about it
This isn't tampering at all. And as far the Briggs situation goes, the team was talking with Briggs' agent Drew Rosenhaus during the season without the Bears permission. That's a direct violation of the tampering policy. The documented communications were shared at the hearing.
Public/Private Statements. Any public or private statement of interest, qualified or unqualified, in another club's player to that player's agent or representative, or to a member of the news media, is a violation of this AntiTampering Policy. (Example of a prohibited comment: "He's an excellent player, and we'd very much like to have him if he were available, but another club holds his rights.") All clubs should be aware that improper disclosure of confidential trade discussions with another club may be a violation of this section on prohibited public statements.
It would be a clear problem if not for the fact that 49ers had several players that Drew managed. That was a joke tampering charge and I can guarantee if the NFL cared enough to dig into it with Washington they would find stuff.
I'm sure Washington is being careful to use Jayden as the middle man for all conversations but I'm confident the NFL COULD find something if they looked hard enough but they don't hate Washington like us.
The 49ers weren't penalized for talking to Rosenhaus about their own players or free agents. They were penalized for making a statement of interest about Briggs, while Briggs was still under contract to the Bears, and made that statement of interest without the Bears permission for Briggs to talk to other teams. Following the PR spin from the 49ers front office that they didn't do anything malicious and they were within NFL guidelines, they would in-turn leak that the only evidence against them was two missed phone calls where the team left no message and had no conversation. The 49ers stance that the only "contact" was two phone calls is what they told the league during the investigation.
Well, the 49ers lied. The evidence against the 49ers included emails... their own emails. Tim Kawakami reported the existence of emails the day after the league announced the guilty verdict and punishment. The league investigation into the 49ers began a rift between Lal Heneghan (EVP of Football Administration) and Paraag Marathe (Director of Football Ops) that would lead to Heneghan's eventual ouster in 2011. Team executives had been emailing each other bragging about tampering with Briggs and doing it without Heneghan knowing. Matt Maiocco would let the existence of the emails slip a year later when he complained about the Jets allegedly tampering with Crabtree during his holdout. The league office was not happy with the 49ers trying to PR spin to claim innocence which conversely attempted to make Goodell look stupid.