Brandon Aiyuk is a Quitter! Pick #25, 2020 NFL Draft

But if they trade him I don't think they can even try to get any $$ back. It'd only be if he gets cut (which there's probably a 95% chance of happening)

Originally posted by frenchmov:
But if they trade him I don't think they can even try to get any $$ back. It'd only be if he gets cut (which there's probably a 95% chance of happening)

There's no difference. All that matters is timing and Aiyuk's status.

Yes, NFL teams have taken players to court, usually to recoup portions of signing bonuses or to enforce contractual terms when a player violates the terms of their deal, retires abruptly, or gets suspended for off-field conduct. [1, 2]

Several prominent examples of teams or sports entities taking players to court include:
Ricky Williams (2004): After Williams abruptly retired just before the season, the Miami Dolphins took him to court and won an arbitrator's ruling ordering him to repay roughly $8.6 million in signing bonuses.
Albert Haynesworth (2012): The Washington Redskins filed a lawsuit in federal court to collect a $20 million bonus the defensive lineman was set to earn, with the case eventually resulting in a settlement.

If we take him to federal court would another nfl team really be interested in signing him in the midst of a such a legal dispute? Seems like it'd be more trouble than it'd be worth in distractions. Plus how can you expect a player to be able to train and study film in such a situation especially Aiyuk? Keep buying custom chains, lambos and taking private jets Brandon you're going to be broke before you know it when you have to pay 75% of that contract back

He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

Originally posted by Heroism:
He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

A man stands on his word. Don't back track

Originally posted by Since07:
Yes, NFL teams have taken players to court, usually to recoup portions of signing bonuses or to enforce contractual terms when a player violates the terms of their deal, retires abruptly, or gets suspended for off-field conduct. [1, 2]

Several prominent examples of teams or sports entities taking players to court include:
Ricky Williams (2004): After Williams abruptly retired just before the season, the Miami Dolphins took him to court and won an arbitrator's ruling ordering him to repay roughly $8.6 million in signing bonuses.
Albert Haynesworth (2012): The Washington Redskins filed a lawsuit in federal court to collect a $20 million bonus the defensive lineman was set to earn, with the case eventually resulting in a settlement.

If we take him to federal court would another nfl team really be interested in signing him in the midst of a such a legal dispute? Seems like it'd be more trouble than it'd be worth in distractions. Plus how can you expect a player to be able to train and study film in such a situation especially Aiyuk? Keep buying custom chains, lambos and taking private jets Brandon you're going to be broke before you know it when you have to pay 75% of that contract back

When you ask AI questions, the way the questions are worded is* important and it's important to verify the information it provides.

The info provided here is inaccurate and irrelevant.

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by Since07:
Yes, NFL teams have taken players to court, usually to recoup portions of signing bonuses or to enforce contractual terms when a player violates the terms of their deal, retires abruptly, or gets suspended for off-field conduct. [1, 2]

Several prominent examples of teams or sports entities taking players to court include:
Ricky Williams (2004): After Williams abruptly retired just before the season, the Miami Dolphins took him to court and won an arbitrator's ruling ordering him to repay roughly $8.6 million in signing bonuses.
Albert Haynesworth (2012): The Washington Redskins filed a lawsuit in federal court to collect a $20 million bonus the defensive lineman was set to earn, with the case eventually resulting in a settlement.

If we take him to federal court would another nfl team really be interested in signing him in the midst of a such a legal dispute? Seems like it'd be more trouble than it'd be worth in distractions. Plus how can you expect a player to be able to train and study film in such a situation especially Aiyuk? Keep buying custom chains, lambos and taking private jets Brandon you're going to be broke before you know it when you have to pay 75% of that contract back

When you ask AI questions, the way the questions are worded are important and it's important to verify the information it provides.

The info provided here is inaccurate and irrelevant.

100%

I catch it being wrong more times that it is right.

Originally posted by Crown:

Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:

Originally posted by Since07:
Yes, NFL teams have taken players to court, usually to recoup portions of signing bonuses or to enforce contractual terms when a player violates the terms of their deal, retires abruptly, or gets suspended for off-field conduct. [1, 2]

Several prominent examples of teams or sports entities taking players to court include:
Ricky Williams (2004): After Williams abruptly retired just before the season, the Miami Dolphins took him to court and won an arbitrator's ruling ordering him to repay roughly $8.6 million in signing bonuses.
Albert Haynesworth (2012): The Washington Redskins filed a lawsuit in federal court to collect a $20 million bonus the defensive lineman was set to earn, with the case eventually resulting in a settlement.

If we take him to federal court would another nfl team really be interested in signing him in the midst of a such a legal dispute? Seems like it'd be more trouble than it'd be worth in distractions. Plus how can you expect a player to be able to train and study film in such a situation especially Aiyuk? Keep buying custom chains, lambos and taking private jets Brandon you're going to be broke before you know it when you have to pay 75% of that contract back

When you ask AI questions, the way the questions are worded are important and it's important to verify the information it provides.

The info provided here is inaccurate and irrelevant.

100%

I catch it being wrong more times that it is right.

I'm so glad we leveraged our entire economy on a service that replaces our thinking but only gets things correct part of the time.

Originally posted by Heroism:
He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

I'm guessing his agent is trying to mend things enough to try to get an earlier release (maybe calling in a favor to Lynch), but I think niners are going to dig in after how Aiyuk has acted.

Deebo did it the right way

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by Heroism:
He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

I'm guessing his agent is trying to mend things enough to try to get an earlier release (maybe calling in a favor to Lynch), but I think niners are going to dig in after how Aiyuk has acted.

Deebo did it the right way

Doubt he's talking to anyone who can help him right now

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by Heroism:
He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

I'm guessing his agent is trying to mend things enough to try to get an earlier release (maybe calling in a favor to Lynch), but I think niners are going to dig in after how Aiyuk has acted.

Deebo did it the right way

49ers should ask for a apology video in any trade/release scenarios

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by frenchmov:

Originally posted by Heroism:
He deleted the videos. Why you running from the belt, BA?

I'm guessing his agent is trying to mend things enough to try to get an earlier release (maybe calling in a favor to Lynch), but I think niners are going to dig in after how Aiyuk has acted.

Deebo did it the right way

Doubt he's talking to anyone who can help him right now

I think maybe it hit home that if you're broadcasting that the Niners made a bad investment in you by investing $50M in guarantees to you over the first couple years that it may give your next employer reservations as well

You cant go around telling everyone that it's stupid to pay you up front right?

I think that would be common sense for most people

Originally posted by Pillbusta:
I think maybe it hit home that if you're broadcasting that the Niners made a bad investment in you by investing $50M in guarantees to you over the first couple years that it may give your next employer reservations as well

You cant go around telling everyone that it's stupid to pay you up front right?

I think that would be common sense for most people

If he took the time to articulate it, I think he was saying the 49ers were dumb for paying me and then not letting me play (the assumption some have)

Let's be honest, he's an insecure guy. He probably thought that the medias, the fans would be behind him and trash the Niners FO and Shanahan. And this way he could force his release and join his best friend with the Commanders.
I think unfortunately he's too stupid to realize that every team in the NFL wants the Niners to make things hard on him and that he should listen to his agent.
Fred was right all along.

One of my favorite words is dumbass. It's so elegant yet so harsh at the same time. He's a combination of dumbass and stupid b*****d lol