Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by VinculumJuris:
This is why I think the win against Seattle meant so little so early in the season. Their talent was rapidly ascending throughout the season, coupled with a defensive scheme that proved to be a nightmare for just about everyone outside of LA. We got one over on them as their engines were just warming up, but I think we're in their rearview now in a big way.
Why couldn't have SF gotten better as the season went on (if everyone stayed healthy)?
Two factors in my mind:
1 - Seattle's young talent proved to be legit and ramped on a crazy trajectory. Though some of our young talent went down with injury, I do not see them having the same upside that Seattle's proved to have even if healthy all season. SF might have gotten better overall with young players, but I have a very hard time believing the team would have climbed as much as Seattle did because that just doesn't happen that often. Meanwhile, the core is aging (especially on offense).
Edit: I see it as unlikely that our young talent would have sufficiently ramped to keep pace with Seattle, even if the vets had stayed healthy. More likely in my mind is we have a couple of keepers who can turn into good depth or average starters but no game changers. All of it is speculative, including your hope that SF would have gotten materially better had everyone stayed healthy. I just see the likely outcome leaning in an unfavorable direction for us.
2 - New head coach whose program is clearly formidable. It took him one season to lay the groundwork, and we saw the fruits of that maturing throughout this past season. I'm a Shanahan fan and think he did a great job last season but do not think his program is gaining steam.
[ Edited by VinculumJuris on Feb 21, 2026 at 11:50 AM ]