Originally posted by MinerForty-Niner:
Why didn't SF just stick to a number and say 'this is our best and final offer, take it or we trade, that simple'? We could have gotten the Steelers #2 (pick 50) and money to have kept Greenlaw possibly. What a horrible decision to keep him when we knew it was not smart and good business.
"This is our best and final offer, take it or we trade, that simple" was already done by Aiyuk.
Remember, Aiyuk was the one that brought the Steelers to the trade table (for the 2nd time last offseason). He had already worked out terms for an extension with Pittsburgh. Aiyuk replied to Brad (49ers media guy) the two options were to either pay him what he wanted or trade him. That Steelers offer was on the table for weeks and Lynch could have pulled that trigger at any time. The 49ers kept Aiyuk because they had no other choice really. Aiyuk plays a vital role in the offense.
The 49ers told Aiyuk they were trading him before the draft. Five teams were willing to trade for him then and pay Aiyuk his asking price of 26M AAV. What they weren't willing to do is give up the trade package Lynch was asking for. In late-February, early-March, the 49ers were asking for a player and first-found pick in return. Wide receivers the 49ers tried to trade for last offseason include Zay Jones, Justin Jefferson, Amari Cooper, George Pickens, Davante Adams, Terry McLaurin (WAS offered Dotson and 49ers countered with McLaurin), Courtland Sutton, and Kendrick Bourne. In the summer trade talks, the Browns and Patriots were willing to trade for Aiyuk, but only if he agreed to an extension with them. As much as some claimed the 49ers had all the leverage, they clearly didn't. Houshmandzadeh was making the media rounds in early June telling folks that Aiyuk would take 120M/4. Aiyuk stuck to that number until the very end and got it, along with more in guarantees. Him fighting for every dollar turned out to be the correct move because he suffered a catastrophic injury last season.
Bringing up Greenlaw is a perfect analog for showing how the 49ers would have operated he if was forced to play on the fifth-year option and got injured. Aiyuk did not prevent us from re-signing Greenlaw. Purdy's upcoming extension did not prevent us from re-signing Greenlaw. The salary cap situation, even after cutting/trading everyone, did not prevent us from re-signing Greenlaw. The 49ers simply didn't offer Greenlaw enough money to convince him to stay. The reporting was that the 49ers offered Greenlaw a one-year "prove it" deal and the Broncos deal was better. The 49ers supposedly made another run at him, but he committed to Denver. You don't have to believe me on this. Go to AB81Rules' salary cap post in this forum. He's talked about re-signing Greenlaw for months and how the cap would not be an impediment to doing so.
[ Edited by Typecast on Mar 28, 2025 at 1:30 PM ]