Keep in mind Jed York is a business man, he is not a football man, he cares about ROI | Page 5

9erred · 2017-10-14T12:49:53-07:00

The Cleveland Browns and SF 49ers both have 62 million dollars in cap space for 2017. The Niners will have 95 million dollars in cap space for 2019. Jed York is raking in the money for 2017 by not spending on players, reaping TV revenue, and ticket revenue while producing an expansion team. One of the few perenial pro bowlers is a tad bit slow, cut him now, save money to make a bigger profit. Whatever happened to having building blocks. This team has been in continuous re building mode since Jed took over. When are fans going to realize it is about the profits, concerts at levis stadium and 49ers franchise value?? 1. When the team signed Hoyer to be the qb, then did not draft a qb until round 3, is that a hint? 2. When the team signed a FB to a record breaking deal?? 3. When the team could have signed Alex Mack to C and Mitchell Schwartz to guard, instead they bring in second tier WR's?? I am just venting, but when a team has cap space, and chooses not to use it, they are not trying to be competitive.

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:03 AM

#61

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.

See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:16 AM

#62

evil
Veteran
Posts: 46,734

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

You ask for a link and he responds by telling you to post one that proves him wrong. That tells me he has no source to back up his opinion.

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:17 AM

#63

TheWooLick
Veteran
Posts: 44,697

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

Money not spent, stays with the Yorks. That is how privately owned businesses work.

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:22 AM

#64

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

Money not spent, stays with the Yorks. That is how privately owned businesses work.

did you bump your head, and like relive everyday the same? we have gone through this how many times now ?

Salaries don't go back into the pockets

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:24 AM

#65

DonnieDarko
Veteran
Posts: 66,770

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:24 AM

#66

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

You ask for a link and he responds by telling you to post one that proves him wrong. That tells me he has no source to back up his opinion.

i tell this guy what seems like every month and he still says the same when already proven incorrect

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:28 AM

#67

TheWooLick
Veteran
Posts: 44,697

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

Money not spent, stays with the Yorks. That is how privately owned businesses work.
did you bump your head, and like relive everyday the same? we have gone through this how many times now ?

Salaries don't go back into the pockets

Please explain where unspent money goes if not to the owners.
I am aware that they must spend an average of 89% but that remaining 11% stays with the owners.

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:28 AM

#68

TheWooLick
Veteran
Posts: 44,697

Originally posted by evil:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

You ask for a link and he responds by telling you to post one that proves him wrong. That tells me he has no source to back up his opinion.

That is a personal attack. I need to prove that unspent money is not spent by the owners, really?
Reported

[ Edited by TheWooLick on Oct 16, 2017 at 10:30 AM ]

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:32 AM

#69

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

Money not spent, stays with the Yorks. That is how privately owned businesses work.
did you bump your head, and like relive everyday the same? we have gone through this how many times now ?

Salaries don't go back into the pockets

Please explain where unspent money goes if not to the owners.
I am aware that they must spend an average of 89% but that remaining 11% stays with the owners.

That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:34 AM

#70

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by evil:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The 49ers rank dead last in spending on active players and it shows. There is money being pocketed that could have been spent on players.
Link that the money gets pocketed

Link that the money has been spent.
If it is not spent, it stays in the York's pocket.
See how you make s**t up. You are the one claiming the BS you should prove it

You ask for a link and he responds by telling you to post one that proves him wrong. That tells me he has no source to back up his opinion.

That is a personal attack. I need to prove that unspent money is not spent by the owners, really?
Reported

that is not a personal attack lol

its part of the rules, you need to prove the info you are claiming

Oct 16, 2017 at 10:56 AM

#71

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,105

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:02 AM

#72

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol

None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:05 AM

#73

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,105

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:07 AM

#74

49AllTheTime
Veteran
Posts: 72,831

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.

yeah it's Rolled over

Oct 16, 2017 at 11:14 AM

#75

SoCold
Hall of Dumb
Posts: 133,105

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:

Originally posted by SoCold:

Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
That 11% or what ever % gets rolled over. if they don't roll that % over it's gets distributed to the league as shared revenue

No it doesn't.

League wide all teams need to spend at least 95% of the cap. Per team is 89%. Only way money is distributed back to the players is if the league wide min is not met.

Story problem time.

Rams have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $995 on some Jimmy Johns.
49ers have $1000 to spend for team lunch and they spend $890 on subway.

How much did Jed save by buying subway?

lol
None, And nothing has been getting pocketed as we have been rolling it over, all of it

It's unused funds. We put this to bed like two years ago when you guys were arguing about it in the AB thread.
yeah it's Rolled over

In bold up there, what you said is 100% false.

They can choose to roll over some or none or all depending how they want to manipulate the cap.

Shared revenue is the combined avg of 31 teams. Plus the Cowboys revenue.

[ Edited by SoCold on Oct 16, 2017 at 11:15 AM ]