Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by jcs:
Originally posted by okdkid:
I think he's okay and I'm happy to have him. He is good between the 20s. But I don't feel confident with him as a TE1. Would prefer to have somebody else in that spot.
Can't judge him on his rookie season, especially one with 3 different QB's tossing him the ball.
Does that include the good and the bad? Or just the bad?
Equally but the good does highlight his potential.
Sure, but I wouldn't avoid taking a TE in round 2 (or trading for one) because of it. If a TE is BPA in round 2 or 3... we should pull the trigger.
TE is the least of our worries, Kittle was the 2nd most productive Rookie last year and his physical talent is among the best in the league. I can see us drafting one later in day 3 as we need depth but I honestly think KS is planning on Kittle and Celek being his top two guys next year.
Here's my question to you...what is it about Kittle that makes you think he's not the future at the position for this team?
I'm assuming you mean a TE1...because he obviously can be a decent TE. If we're talking about in the context of a TE1 -- then I would say that I have no confidence he can be a consistent threat all over the field. Yes, he is explosive and that helps. I think his hands are subpar. And I have my doubts he can stay healthy -- but happy to have him prove me wrong.
But as you said -- we can't judge him, even the good. So, why not try to improve the position? He should have to beat somebody out. Why gift him TE1 status? Very few players on this roster have earned that right.
Again, I'm not saying he's a bad TE. I'm saying I wouldn't consider the position "set" because we have Kittle. We can do better. I don't think there's a single defense in the NFL that gives a s**t that they have to play against George Kittle.
[ Edited by okdkid on Mar 30, 2018 at 3:55 PM ]