Amazing how fragile people are. Yes, we all are emotional when our team loses, especially in the biggest game. Hell I didn't sleep well for 2 days after the last Super Bowl loss.
That doesn't mean that it makes any sense whatsoever to scapegoat Kyle and Kyle only because you are butthurt about getting so close but not quite winning it all. If you watched the game, the Niners were clearly the better team. But when there are 7 fumbles in the game and one team recovers 6 of them, the odds of winning are near 0%. Kittle was clearly nowhere near healthy, nor was Deebo, and Greenlaw hit the lottery in reverse tearing his achilles simply running on the field. What if we were the team that fell on the ball 6 of the 7 times? We win by 3 TD's.
Yet with all of this unimaginably bad luck, we still got into overtime because Kyle and the team he built were that much better than the Chiefs. The only problem is if your luck is bad enough, you have nearly no chance to succeed. Yes, it's a gladitorial game and sometimes you can overcome a bad hand. But you can't win a poker tournament if you can't even draw a pair on any hand. Sometimes the football gods are just cruel, but if you can't handle that, don't watch.
The misplaced anger that people have about Kyle because he's the easiest target is so maddening to me. It's just a total loser mentality. It's not being mature enough to understand that you are so mad that your team lost that you need someone to villify. You say insanse things like he's incapable of winning it all when the reality is if he'd didn't have luck so incredibly bad that nobody could overcome it, he'd already have a ring and your self-pitying narrative would be destroyed.
Don't get me wrong - he may never win the Super Bowl. But that's because it's really hard to win one and it takes at least as much luck as skill to win it all. If this were not true, the last team to lead the league in DVOA and win the Super Bowl would not be Seattle in
2013. Mock DVOA all you want, but we do not have a better metric to determine who is good and who is bad that a situationally based broad group of statistics tested over the years. Great football teams lose to inferior ones all the damn time, and when it happens it's inevitable, not a reason to get rid of a proven winner. The Niners were stastically the best team in football in 2019 and 2023, and the hottest team in 2022 until again historically bad luck hit with the Purdy and Josh Johnson injuries in the NFCCG. But again, the statistically best team has not won it all in 11 years.
We all fall victim to our feelings at time, and there is a best selling book called the Righteous Mind that connects just how emotional we all are. Human beings are not logical, we have gut feelling/intuitions and the precious logic we all feel we run on is actually only used to confirm our intutions. The author uses a metaphor to call our intuitions an elephant, because it's a huge animal that is among the most intelligent in the world. Our logic is the rider of the elephant. A human rider can train an elephant to perform certain behaviors through careful training and nuturing. However if the elephant is worked up enough, all the rider can do is hang on because the elephant cannot be overpowered, it can only be coaxed by the rider to take logical actions when the elephant is receptive.
Sports fans are fanatics who believe they are rational, but are actually far more emotional than they realize. They use confirmation bias to overemphasize the stats that confirm their position while ignoring or minimizing the relevance of facts that don't fit their narrative.
The more Niner fans actually use logic, have patience, and have any control of our emotions, the more they support Kyle because the actual data supports that he is a very good, if not great coach.
If we refuse to live in the real world, and are only satisfied with winning the Super Bowl because we live in an egocentric world where our team is special, Bill Walsh's success somehow means Kyle is not good, and we fans "deserve" a chamopinship, we'll be disapppointed nearly every year. If we are foolsih/petty/childish/emotional enough to not tolerate losing a Super Bowl or two in the pursuit of winning one, we'll be adamant that someone/anyone else would give us a better chance. But that would more be based on feelings than facts. Then we will die on the hill of pretending that he can't do what he's been inches from doing multiple times only to have historically bad luck doom him, especially in 2022 and 2023. We'll passionately construct stories in which Kyle is the villian and steer the narrative towards him being too stubborn, too conservative, too whatever made us lose in hindsight to ever win a championship.
It all comes back to this - being a fan of a contender nearly ends in heartbreak nearly every season. Only one team can win it all, and in football it's usually the team that stays healthy and straight up gets lucky with fumbles/tipped INT's/fortunate officiating in the biggest games. If you are too weak to handle that, you'll keep blaming the coach. You will believe in your heart that you "just know" things that are unknowable in advance. And history may prove you right. But that's doesn't mean your argument makes any sense whatsoever.
The data suggests you toughen up. Realize how lucky you are to have a coach that has his team contending nearly every year. Realize there may be no coach that gives you a better chance to get what you want so badly. Stop trying to distance yourself from Kyle because it feels like he hurt you and you want revenge.
Realize that all of this is just misplaced anger because you didn't get what you want and you need someone to blame for it.
[ Edited by SweetOJ on Jan 9, 2026 at 1:32 PM ]