Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Honestly the Garrett trade doesn't look good right now, I mean it may and likely will be good long term but right now it's not, their 1st they gave up may end up being top 10 and they could have used that pick to get an elite weapon, I still don't get how they took Ty Simpson when they clearly needed a WR, I think the deal wasn't great for them, great for Cleveland they got a 1, 2 and a 3 and a great up and coming EDGE in Verse
Yeah I said this before but idk why the rams traded so much for a position they already had a really good young player. They upgraded their position but not a major upgrade cause they already had a really good DL. They didn't replace garret with someone mediocre or bad, they replaced a very good young player for a very very good older player and it was super expensive.
trades of that magnitude should be at a real position of need. They essentially took a very good young DE and traded that players youth and prime (and 1st, 2nd, and 3rd) for an older players last bit of prime. Just so weird to me.
then they added a 35 year DT who hasn't played in 2 years, which I don't think was great. He may get better as the year goes on but I never found that to be some "terrifying" move.
[ Edited by tankle104 on Oct 21, 2026 at 8:30 PM ]
Cleveland is having a pretty good season. That team is loaded with talent on both sides of the ball.