Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by Shorteous:Originally posted by Big_Daddy:Originally posted by TheWooLick:The money means nothing to me. The 49ers have tons of it and haven't been spending it as it becomes less valuable when it is rolled over year after year. I hope the team ends up with three better receivers than Smith. I want the WR corps to be more talented than they have been.
Thank you!!!
Who gives a shît if we spend money or keep smith contract on the roster. So much space and it's not our money!! Spend it!!!
I can't believe that this has to be explained. I believe, that if you really thought about it seriously for a few minutes, you'd realize pretty quickly why you don't pay $500 for a bad oil change service. It doesn't matter whether your the CEO of Google or not and the money doesn't matter. Then think about what happens if your mechanic finds out that your paying $500 for somebody to do a spotty job of your oil.
It's not difficult, you can't reward bad performances and expect your next results to get better. You send a signal that if you don't live up to your cost, you won't continue to get paid.
COME ON PEOPLE!
What are you talking about. Bad performance? Since when did we have a QB who could hit smith? He's talented, just not used. Flacco knew how to use him and made him a true weapon. I guess you're saying we don't need weapons.
We only had QBs who were garbage and took easier completions. Your comparison holds no water.
So all teams with bad quarterbacks have 6+mil/yr receives who are 6th on the team in receiving stats, targets and catches. That argument is lazy, like putting a triangle in a circular hole. Ya it fits....
Who was throwing to Pryor?



