There are 669 users in the forums
Originally posted by NCommand:
They could have paid for Laken regardless.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
False. Cut Jimmy, eat 8 or whatever million due to injury/surgery stuff.
Pay Laken, have Banks compete for RG spot or release him if he's a total bum.
Boom, you solved one problem with Jimmys money. And probably have a few more dollars leftover to throw at an adequate safety. Wasn't too hard, was it ?
Originally posted by Koldo:
Are people really praising Lynch for the atrocious mismanagement of the Jimmy G situation?
Originally posted by Koldo:
Are people really praising Lynch for the atrocious mismanagement of the Jimmy G situation?
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Koldo:
Are people really praising Lynch for the atrocious mismanagement of the Jimmy G situation?
He made the best of this actually.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by NCommand:
They could have paid for Laken regardless.
Not sure they had the cap space to do so, so it depends on the structure of the contract. The point is, Laken was an ironman and actually made the pro bowl. Hes a very good guard. Why not pay him ?
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by Koldo:
Are people really praising Lynch for the atrocious mismanagement of the Jimmy G situation?
He made the best of this actually.
SD with an arrow of truth
Originally posted by NCommand:
The greatest myth ever told was Jimmy's contract holding our FO back from making the team better. As you just saw, whether cut or restructured, it really didn't have an effect on signing their own or others...if they wanted too. There's a ton of ways to structure it for 2023.
Originally posted by Koldo:
Are people really praising Lynch for the atrocious mismanagement of the Jimmy G situation?
Originally posted by NCommand:
The greatest myth ever told was Jimmy's contract holding our FO back from making the team better. As you just saw, whether cut or restructured, it really didn't have an effect on signing their own or others...if they wanted too. There's a ton of ways to structure it for 2023.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
It's true. He made good on a really bad situation. At worst we have the best 1, 2 in the league. 2 good QB's isn't bad to have. QB's often get injured. The have the deepest QB room in the league. A talented one too. It's not really bad at all.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
It's true. He made good on a really bad situation. At worst we have the best 1, 2 in the league. 2 good QB's isn't bad to have. QB's often get injured. The have the deepest QB room in the league. A talented one too. It's not really bad at all.
Originally posted by Koldo:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
It's true. He made good on a really bad situation. At worst we have the best 1, 2 in the league. 2 good QB's isn't bad to have. QB's often get injured. The have the deepest QB room in the league. A talented one too. It's not really bad at all.
No way this is the best 1, 2 in the league.
Jimmy is a very limited QB and we don't even know for sure what we have in Trey.
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
Originally posted by NCommand:
The greatest myth ever told was Jimmy's contract holding our FO back from making the team better. As you just saw, whether cut or restructured, it really didn't have an effect on signing their own or others...if they wanted too. There's a ton of ways to structure it for 2023.
The cap space is not made out of rubber. Eventually theres not more players you can afford to sign. For all the talk of OL being a problem, going from Laken to Banks is a clear downgrade at least short-term. This is a move a team like the Rams doesn't usually make. Whats the point of going Banks over Laken ? Money.
What Jimmy's contract held in hostage ? Money.