Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by thl408:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
5th best team in pass coverage over the last 3 years. Thanks John Lynch!
I'd like to see how they grade this. Seems extremely subjective.
Well there is going to be some subjectivity involved because ultimately their grading does involve human beings watching each player in coverage on each play and assigning a grade from -2 to 2 with 0 being neutral based on an internally shared criteria. It will always be imperfect because they don't know everything about what each player was asked to do and no one is going to be perfectly consistent when assigning grades. However, if looking at the coverage grade for the entire unit, that specific knowledge becomes less important and over the course of 100s of passing plays, you will get a somewhat accurate idea for how a passing defense performed especially when you can compare it to other more objective stats like EPA, Yards, Pts, etc. to see how well it correlates.
I'm assuming they omit the play from the defensive line. For example, if Bosa destroys the OT and applies immediate pressure, the coverage grade is neutral, or undefined, because the pass play didn't have a chance to develop in order to gauge how the defensive coverage responds. Likewise, if the QB has all day to look downfield, the coverage should only be on the hook to cover for 3 seconds (or whatever) depending on the timing of the pass play (3/5/7 step play).
Anyway, zone coverage will generally do better in terms of a, "perfectly covered play", and this chart seems to show that since BAL/NE are in the lower tier for that chart - two teams that play more man when compared to other teams. A perfectly covered play, when playing man coverage, means all five guys did a perfect job, not easy.