Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 623 users in the forums

John Lynch - 49ers GM

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by 49ersRing:
Originally posted by 49ers81:
Originally posted by CatchMaster80:
I was reading Lynch's comments regarding Jimmy and I hope he's just trying to drum up trade interest. I really don't want to see him on the Niners for another year. We've been down that road and we know we need an upgrade. Holding back Trey for another year is just going to delay the upgrade. Even if they start Trey, you don't want him looking over his shoulder all season. He needs to worry about defenses not Jimmy.

So, it was okay for Jimmy to be in that position last year but Lance shouldn't have to do it because, what, he's too emotionally fragile? I will gladly admit that the situation with Jimmy probably isn't what anyone expected going into the new season. If they are serious about not releasing him in the event they're unable to swing a trade somewhere then the only way this would work going forward is to have a truly open competition for the job through training camp and pre-season and let the best man win. The team would have to know that each guy was given a fair shot and that the decision was made to go with the guy who gave them the best chance to win not because of his draft status or veteran presence and relationship with the players but because he was judged by all of them to be the best guy for the job. Any other option might open the door to issues down the road. It feels like the team has kind of turned the page on Jimmy so I'm not sure they will want to go back down that road but if he's on the roster come training camp and is able to throw it seems to me they will have to let him compete. He has probably earned too much goodwill in the locker room to just be relegated to an afterthought. Time will tell I guess.

No, I don't want them taking away reps from Lance, which he sorely needs, to hold a competition with Jimmy. They already know everything that Jimmy is capable of, so there is no reason to do that.

If they want to let Jimmy throw once he's healthy, then it makes sense to have him work exclusively with the 2nd group.

So Lance shouldn't have to compete for a job that he's claiming is his. You want to give him the job but you don't want him to earn it. Got it..

No, Lance shouldn't have to compete in an open competition for the job. How many QBs around the league compete in an open competition each year? Lance and Jimmy didn't compete in an open competition last year and it made more sense then to hold one than it does now. Again, they already know what Jimmy is capable of at this point, so what would even be the point in giving those snaps to him?

That doesn't mean Lance can just show up and expect to be handed the job. He's still got to compete to earn the faith of the coaches. I mean, Aiyuk was penciled in as a starter last year, but when he didn't give the effort the coaches expected, his role diminished. Which is to say, players always have to compete and prove they deserve their spot, but that's not the same thing as an open competition.

Competition is competition. To try and pretend there is some difference between an open competition and any other kind is just BS semantics. Obviously a veteran like Kittle or Trent Williams is always going to have an edge. I mean you would really have to beat them out to take their place because they've obviously earned it. Lance hasn't earned anything yet beyond his draft status. He still has a lot to prove on a team that got as far as the NFC Championship game. It's like the situation in Seattle when they drafted Wilson. They had just spent a boatload of money on that guy Flynn from Green Bay who went into camp as the presumptive starter. By the end of training camp Wilson had clearly shown he was the better player and got the nod. Why shouldn't Lance be held to the same standard? Like I said you want to give him the job, you don't want him to earn it. That being said I doubt it will even come to that. I suspect that the team will find a way to move Jimmy before his contract comes due. Still it remains a possibility and if Jimmy is in camp he should be allowed to compete.

It's not just semantics. In one scenario, you have Jimmy and Lance splitting reps with the 1s and in the other, you don't. There's no reason to do the former and it's not necessary to still have competition. Again, they've seen enough of Jimmy to know everything he is capable of. They don't need to see him take another snap in order to determine whether or not he gives us a better chance than Trey to win the Super Bowl this year.
[ Edited by 49ersRing on May 3, 2022 at 3:46 PM ]
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
I wonder how much of this philosophy has carried over to Kyle and Lynch.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1700461-how-does-mike-shanahan-always-churn-out-rb-success
How do you get a bunch of overgrown children to put their egos to bed and listen to you? That's the challenge NFL coaches have been dealing with while trying to hold the attention of 20-something-year-old millionaires for decades, and doing so is even more difficult when you're trying to get them to grip a zone-blocking scheme, which requires a tremendous amount of focus, hard work and discipline to master.

Is it easier to make a sixth-round pick listen to you? Absolutely, and that's a big reason all of the elements of the Shanahan/Gibbs system have come together successfully. Not only do they not need superstars, but they really don't even want them.



It isn't easy to teach eight or nine guys to work in unison, period. Shanahan has found a way. Gibbs, too, but as Brown pointed out he's been forced to jump around the league a bit.

While the draft sometimes feels like a crapshoot, especially in the later rounds, Shanahan hasn't simply gotten lucky over and over again. He's handpicking linemen and backs who suit his scheme, he's hiring them, he's grooming them and he's producing ground success at a rate that doesn't seem possible in this ultra-competitive league.

Nice find. Some folks on the boards complain about pass protection. The truth is if an offense can run the ball affectively and execute play action, it helps limit the number of 3rd and long situations that an offense has to face. Which is why, even though we don't have many individual pass blocking studs that we still do well as a unit in the pass blocking department.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Really really hope either Verrett shows he can stay healthy, or the rooks beat him out, which would be a good thing IMO, but please for the love of god, beat our Johnson, I'm so tired of him being on the roster, that & the $2M GTD to Sudfeld really are two of my head scratchers, along with another back in the 3rd.

I wish they would have got a safety or something instead of the running back. but we did need a running back so i am calm about that. lol.. i am hopeful in jason making the roster and at least a great back up. good vet presence back there but i totally understand your hopes for the kids to make it.. i just think its nice to have a experienced cb back there. our best teams aside from 81 is with at least one vet back there. walt harris. sherman. etc. the whole 29 million dollars in back up quarterbacks makes me crazy so no need to do the poor dead horse thing,, i think purdy , his energy. mobility will take the number two from sud, in regards to johnson...... as cc would say.....you said nothing wrong
[ Edited by cciowa on May 3, 2022 at 3:50 PM ]
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Really really hope either Verrett shows he can stay healthy, or the rooks beat him out, which would be a good thing IMO, but please for the love of god, beat our Johnson, I'm so tired of him being on the roster, that & the $2M GTD to Sudfeld really are two of my head scratchers, along with another back in the 3rd.

I wish they would have got a safety or something instead of the running back. but we did need a running back so i am calm about that. lol.. i am hopeful in jason making the roster and at least a great back up. good vet presence back there but i totally understand your hopes for the kids to make it.. i just think its nice to have a experienced cb back there. our best teams aside from 81 is with at least one vet back there. walt harris. sherman. etc. the whole 29 million dollars in back up quarterbacks makes me crazy so no need to do the poor dead horse thing,, i think purdy , his energy. mobility will take the number two from sud, in regards to johnson...... as cc would say.....you said nothing wrong

My man, & I do believe Verrett makes the team, either 53 or he begins on PUP or IR/to return after 3 games.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
My man, & I do believe Verrett makes the team, either 53 or he begins on PUP or IR/to return after 3 games.

do you think there is any chance any of our cornerbacks. not our nice free agent in ward or jason v. but someone could get turned into a safety to fill that hole beside jimmy ward. or do you think we will just stay pat with who we got and maybe sign tartt... i am not saying that in a smart ass way cuz you know i hate tartt.. but just was wondering what you think the plan is to fill the safety hole since it was not filled in the regular draft.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
My man, & I do believe Verrett makes the team, either 53 or he begins on PUP or IR/to return after 3 games.

do you think there is any chance any of our cornerbacks. not our nice free agent in ward or jason v. but someone could get turned into a safety to fill that hole beside jimmy ward. or do you think we will just stay pat with who we got and maybe sign tartt... i am not saying that in a smart ass way cuz you know i hate tartt.. but just was wondering what you think the plan is to fill the safety hole since it was not filled in the regular draft.

Not sure, maybe Castro-Fields, but I'm hoping Leon O'Neal Jr. can step up and become something, he's got a chip on his shoulder after being undrafted. I'm also irritated we didn't take a Safety in the draft, was shocked by the RB pick, not cause we picked a back, just so early, just hope he plays well. I do think George Odom will surprise people, but only time will tell.
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
My man, & I do believe Verrett makes the team, either 53 or he begins on PUP or IR/to return after 3 games.

do you think there is any chance any of our cornerbacks. not our nice free agent in ward or jason v. but someone could get turned into a safety to fill that hole beside jimmy ward. or do you think we will just stay pat with who we got and maybe sign tartt... i am not saying that in a smart ass way cuz you know i hate tartt.. but just was wondering what you think the plan is to fill the safety hole since it was not filled in the regular draft.

Not sure, maybe Castro-Fields, but I'm hoping Leon O'Neal Jr. can step up and become something, he's got a chip on his shoulder after being undrafted. I'm also irritated we didn't take a Safety in the draft, was shocked by the RB pick, not cause we picked a back, just so early, just hope he plays well. I do think George Odom will surprise people, but only time will tell.

I did forget about odom.. that would be something if a undrafted free agent took the job, hell it worked out for warner and romo just to name a couple of guys
  • cciowa
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 60,541
Originally posted by cciowa:
I did forget about odom.. that would be something if a undrafted free agent took the job, hell it worked out for warner and romo just to name a couple of guys

cc forgot to say.. my son law looks just like romo.. my nephew especially with a sort of a beard looks just like bosa. and my other nephew looks just like aaron hernandez. i have no point here
Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So where would you rank our roster today, objectively?

Buffalo Bills
Los Angeles Rams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Los Angeles Chargers
Las Vegas Raiders
Baltimore Ravens
Indianapolis Colts
Dallas Cowboys
overall team ?

I think only the Bills are above us.

Bills & 49er are the only teams that has stayed nearly the same but added more quality players

all the other teams are question marks and haven't proven what they will be like with the players lost or gained

That's a tough one. I think we're short a few top end playmakers but depthwise, we're #1, no doubt.

Buffalo Bills
Baltimore Ravens
Los Angeles Chargers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Los Angeles Rams
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Green Bay Packers
Dallas Cowboys
Las Vegas Raiders
Indianapolis Colts

This doesn't mean the Bills will win the Superbowl.

No way I put Lamar Jackson & the Ravens ahead of us, Lamar is garbage IMO, he's not a good pocket QB. Our roster is top 5, along with KC, LAR, BUF, & TB IMO, LAC right behind us.

I'm just going by talent. The Ravens went 8-9 last year with the most injured team ever since AGL has been tracked (blew our 2020 season out of the water). Then they added more talent. They're way up there. But as to winning it all, no doubt Lamar most likely isn't going to take them anywhere.
[ Edited by NCommand on May 3, 2022 at 5:12 PM ]
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
I wonder how much of this philosophy has carried over to Kyle and Lynch.

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/1700461-how-does-mike-shanahan-always-churn-out-rb-success
How do you get a bunch of overgrown children to put their egos to bed and listen to you? That's the challenge NFL coaches have been dealing with while trying to hold the attention of 20-something-year-old millionaires for decades, and doing so is even more difficult when you're trying to get them to grip a zone-blocking scheme, which requires a tremendous amount of focus, hard work and discipline to master.

Is it easier to make a sixth-round pick listen to you? Absolutely, and that's a big reason all of the elements of the Shanahan/Gibbs system have come together successfully. Not only do they not need superstars, but they really don't even want them.



It isn't easy to teach eight or nine guys to work in unison, period. Shanahan has found a way. Gibbs, too, but as Brown pointed out he's been forced to jump around the league a bit.

While the draft sometimes feels like a crapshoot, especially in the later rounds, Shanahan hasn't simply gotten lucky over and over again. He's handpicking linemen and backs who suit his scheme, he's hiring them, he's grooming them and he's producing ground success at a rate that doesn't seem possible in this ultra-competitive league.

Nice find. Some folks on the boards complain about pass protection. The truth is if an offense can run the ball affectively and execute play action, it helps limit the number of 3rd and long situations that an offense has to face. Which is why, even though we don't have many individual pass blocking studs that we still do well as a unit in the pass blocking department.


Now go sit in the corner.

It was solid last year, overall.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So where would you rank our roster today, objectively?

Buffalo Bills
Los Angeles Rams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Los Angeles Chargers
Las Vegas Raiders
Baltimore Ravens
Indianapolis Colts
Dallas Cowboys
overall team ?

I think only the Bills are above us.

Bills & 49er are the only teams that has stayed nearly the same but added more quality players

all the other teams are question marks and haven't proven what they will be like with the players lost or gained

I agree. I keep picking the Bills and Niners as the SB teams the last 2 years and if not for Verrett getting injured or Tre White getting injured both the niners and bills would've easily beat the Rams and Cinn.

My top 5 NFL rosters are:
Bills
49ers
TB
Rams
KC
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So where would you rank our roster today, objectively?

Buffalo Bills
Los Angeles Rams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Los Angeles Chargers
Las Vegas Raiders
Baltimore Ravens
Indianapolis Colts
Dallas Cowboys
overall team ?

I think only the Bills are above us.

Bills & 49er are the only teams that has stayed nearly the same but added more quality players

all the other teams are question marks and haven't proven what they will be like with the players lost or gained

I agree. I keep picking the Bills and Niners as the SB teams the last 2 years and if not for Verrett getting injured or Tre White getting injured both the niners and bills would've easily beat the Rams and Cinn.

My top 5 NFL rosters are:
Bills
49ers
TB
Rams
KC

we talking about who has the best Rooo-stor?

Originally posted by AB81Rules:
Originally posted by JoseCortez:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by NotAFinga42:
Originally posted by 49erFaithful6:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So where would you rank our roster today, objectively?

Buffalo Bills
Los Angeles Rams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Los Angeles Chargers
Las Vegas Raiders
Baltimore Ravens
Indianapolis Colts
Dallas Cowboys
overall team ?

I think only the Bills are above us.

Bills & 49er are the only teams that has stayed nearly the same but added more quality players

all the other teams are question marks and haven't proven what they will be like with the players lost or gained

Bills lol. They have zero super bowl championships. They cannot run the football they don't even attempt to do so.

What does that have to do with their current roster?

Lol didn't you know our current roster has totally won a super bowl.

It's easier to name the worse teams

Colts cowboys Raiders

That's it

Wait, so we have the 4th worst roster? So the Jags roster is on par with us?

No only of those listed.

I just think as fans you guys are looking at the roster with homer goggles.

Qb: we have thee least proven of the bunch. The only qb of the teams listed I'd take Lance over is Matt Ryan as it stands now. Of course that can change.

Rb: as a group? Our #1 is an injury prone 6th rd pick. We have that followed by 2 3rd round reaches.

Wr: with deebo or without? With deebo we are better than chiefs, packers. Ravens and cowboys. That's it.

OL: probably worst on the list, especially with no center and a huge question at left guard.

DL and linebacker: the strength of the team. No argument here.

Secondary: again, bottom barrel

Let's be real here.
[ Edited by JoseCortez on May 4, 2022 at 9:40 AM ]
Originally posted by elguapo:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
So where would you rank our roster today, objectively?

Buffalo Bills
Los Angeles Rams
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Cincinnati Bengals
San Francisco 49ers
Green Bay Packers
Kansas City Chiefs
Denver Broncos
Los Angeles Chargers
Las Vegas Raiders
Baltimore Ravens
Indianapolis Colts
Dallas Cowboys
overall team ?

I think only the Bills are above us.

Bills & 49er are the only teams that has stayed nearly the same but added more quality players

all the other teams are question marks and haven't proven what they will be like with the players lost or gained

I agree. I keep picking the Bills and Niners as the SB teams the last 2 years and if not for Verrett getting injured or Tre White getting injured both the niners and bills would've easily beat the Rams and Cinn.

My top 5 NFL rosters are:
Bills
49ers
TB
Rams
KC

BINGO!!

You mention only one player (JV) would have taken us to the SB and it's kinda silly to try and argue that, but some will try. Now we got a plethora of solid/good players signed in FA, had a solid draft and beefed up the ST...Our roster is significantly improved. It all depends on whether or not TL can be more than just a game manager, but there's a reason the bookmakers/Vegas still has us winning the SB at the odds we're currently sitting at.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone