John Lynch - 49ers GM

Originally posted by DRCHOWDER:

Originally posted by Niners99:

Originally posted by awp8912:

I f**king hate this team sometimes. These cheap b*****ds couldn't offer 2 1sts and Jimmy for Stafford?? This literally also means they will in no way ever pay for Watson who will get an even bigger haul if traded.

f**k this FO and Shanahan. f**k jimmy garbage. Holy s**t! Literally have the worst QB in the division by a wide margin.

But hey keep working on that defense! That's what the tradition of the San Francisco 49ers has always been that vaunted defense!! We need more Dline men and Corners! That'll win us a Superbowl against Mahomes!!
JFC.

🤡🤡🤡

lol damn, I was like ok we didn't get stafford time to move on... but this is another level of depression lol

It's cause Matt Stafford really has a lot of dog in him.

Originally posted by NCommand:
They'll get to first base but that's about it.

John Lynch continues to prove he will turn over every rock but he will not overpay.

Khalil Mack
Odell
Now Matt Stafford#Stafford

— John Chapman (@JL_Chapman) January 31, 2021

One problem. Lynch was offering more than Chicago. Raiders just didn't want to deal with the 49ers.

Thank god they didn´t overpay for OBJ, are you kidding me?
As for Stafford, what should he´ve done? Give two first rounders and more? The Lions didn´t even take a top ten first rounder this year apparently.
Might as well pray for Watson or Rodgers in this case.

My only gripe is I wish he had gone to a QB needy team picking ahead of us. Let some talent trickle down the board our way.

LA overpaid, would have been crazy to try to match that deal.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Here is why I like lynch not giving in. I think of all the franchises that are competitive year in and year out and are well run

Packers, patriots, steelers, ravens


None of them would have done that deal. There are smart organizations, and then there's the rams. And then there are the idiots on here that are mad at lynch for not mortgaging the future.

Wait how are the rams not considered competitive? They've only missed the playoffs once and have never had a losing record. His worst season is 9-7...

Whats Kyle's record in that time?

Who's the idiots here? The team that's shown that they don't need to hoard picks to be competitive?

Or the team too scared to make a good trade and instead gets zero production from those picks we could have sent off?

Can't wait to see us draft another reuben foster. Another Solomon Thomas. Another Dante Pettis. The list goes on.

We can't call ourselves "smart" when we've done nothing but lose except for one season.

Originally posted by JoseCortez:

Here is why I like lynch not giving in. I think of all the franchises that are competitive year in and year out and are well run

Packers, patriots, steelers, ravens


None of them would have done that deal. There are smart organizations, and then there's the rams. And then there are the idiots on here that are mad at lynch for not mortgaging the future.

Not even remotely close to being the same. 3 of those franchises have elite FQBs. We have JG.

Originally posted by NCommand:
All of those franchises spend big and/or had a FQB. I'm assuming you're implying the Rams are dumb yet they've upgraded every year and have been in the playoffs virtually every year even with Goff.

If anything, it proves there are multiple ways to build and sustain a roster around the salary cap now.

Exactly. If Stafford gets hurt or they just don't play well enough to get to the SB then they look like idiots. On the other hand, if they do get to the SB and Jimmy gets hurt again then the 49ers look like the idiots. You're correct in saying that neither the Niners or the Rams way is the right way. It's just 2 different approaches to trying to get to the same place.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by NCommand:

All of those franchises spend big and/or had a FQB. I'm assuming you're implying the Rams are dumb yet they've upgraded every year and have been in the playoffs virtually every year even with Goff.

If anything, it proves there are multiple ways to build and sustain a roster around the salary cap now.

Exactly. If Stafford gets hurt or they just don't play well enough to get to the SB then they look like idiots. On the other hand, if they do get to the SB and Jimmy gets hurt again then the 49ers look like the idiots. You're correct in saying that neither the Niners or the Rams way is the right way. It's just 2 different approaches to trying to get to the same place.

Lol no s**t it's two different approaches. Except, one approach has been far more successful then the other.

Gotta hope they have a plan which I assume they do, because the damage done to the relationship with JG now is probably not repairable.

Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Lol no s**t it's two different approaches. Except, one approach has been far more successful then the other.

Not really. They both have been to the SB (and lost) in recent years. The Rams have been in the playoffs more but that had a lot to do with injuries last year. I think we'll see in a few years which is the more successful route long term.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by Dsoto87:

Lol no s**t it's two different approaches. Except, one approach has been far more successful then the other.

Not really. They both have been to the SB (and lost) in recent years. The Rams have been in the playoffs more but that had a lot to do with injuries last year. I think we'll see in a few years which is the more successful route long term.

Plus McVay started with a loaded roster already

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NCommand:

They'll get to first base but that's about it.

John Lynch continues to prove he will turn over every rock but he will not overpay.

Khalil Mack
Odell
Now Matt Stafford#Stafford

— John Chapman (@JL_Chapman) January 31, 2021

One problem. Lynch was offering more than Chicago. Raiders just didn't want to deal with the 49ers.

False. It was reported by Benjamin Allbright that they were never really in play. Sorry. Like this.

Entertaining with the right price is different than being real players in negotiations.

Originally posted by CatchMaster80:

Originally posted by NCommand:

All of those franchises spend big and/or had a FQB. I'm assuming you're implying the Rams are dumb yet they've upgraded every year and have been in the playoffs virtually every year even with Goff.

If anything, it proves there are multiple ways to build and sustain a roster around the salary cap now.

Exactly. If Stafford gets hurt or they just don't play well enough to get to the SB then they look like idiots. On the other hand, if they do get to the SB and Jimmy gets hurt again then the 49ers look like the idiots. You're correct in saying that neither the Niners or the Rams way is the right way. It's just 2 different approaches to trying to get to the same place.

Originally posted by NCommand:
False. It was reported by Benjamin Allbright that they were never really in play. Sorry. Like this.

Entertaining with the right price is different than being real players in negotiations.

I think i will take John Lynch over Benjamin Allbright.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by PRIMETIME21:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by Ensatsu:

Originally posted by cortana49:

Rams have 0 first round picks until 2024 😬

they still seem to be making the playoffs most of the time. Is it really that much of a big deal?

This.

Yea more than us even, who really should be laughing

49ers made it to the Super Bowl without giving up ONE 1st round pick.

Ok... And? Rams also made a SB, and made multiple playoffs, all that with a terrible QB. All this shows that both ways are viable. And now they probably will be the favorites in the NFC.

Both ways are viable, but which way is the smarter one?? Sure draft picks are a gamble, but this is a huge gamble. One slip us and the Rams set their franchise back for years. And the thing is, if they do win a SB they still set their franchise back. All this while the 49ers keep moving forward.

SB is always the main goal. Theres still teams that haven't won one in their entire history. You think they would care if they set their team 5-10 years back and they win a SB? You think the Eagles rather give the SB back then be in salary cap hell right now? Come on...

Give their Super Bowl back, no, that's not reality. But I do believe they care about setting their team back, in the end that what gets people fired, what's Doug Peterson doing right now??

Now youre really twisting this around. You know very well the reason why Pederson got fired.

And i didnt say they dont care, what i said that a SB trumps that. Eagles fans and FO would glady repeat this scenario if they come out with a SB.