John Lynch - 49ers GM

Originally posted by jcs:

So far Mack has two strip sacks and a pick six in two games.

Didn't try hard enough....

Allen Robinson has 8 catches too at halftime. That's more than our whole team last week.

Originally posted by bigwads:

Growing List of Lynch/Shanahan Mistakes:

1. Trading Trent Brown for a 5th Rounder.
2. Not giving up 2 1st for Khalil Mack. After totally screwing up that Soloman Thomas first rounder, I really have no confidence in this group to draft well in the first.

They traded brown for a 3rd rd pick. If you're gonna complain at least be correct

Originally posted by jcs:

So far Mack has two strip sacks and a pick six in two games.

Didn't try hard enough....

And they still can't put Seattle away.

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jcs:

So far Mack has two strip sacks and a pick six in two games.

Didn't try hard enough....

Allen Robinson has 8 catches too at halftime. That's more than our whole team last week.

Avg 8.3 yard per catch

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by NCommand:

Originally posted by jcs:

So far Mack has two strip sacks and a pick six in two games.

Didn't try hard enough....

Allen Robinson has 8 catches too at halftime. That's more than our whole team last week.

Avg 8.3 yard per catch

Every route is underneath and intermediate. Not his fault.

So far through 2 games we are 21st in the league in O and 22nd on D.Brick by Brick..

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

I'm judging the GM on the direction of the team. The direction is up. As for not likely, your opinion, but it was pretty much all but a formality Cousins was coming here until JG was traded here. And if you think the team is still garbage, just keep watching.

Well the direction can only be up. What was our record when Jimmy stepped in?

We're better run than the Browns, that's about all we've proven so far

We beat the Lions, but not better than the Lions? Have you seen the Cards this year? The Raiders? The Bills? Pittsburgh? Yes the Steelers that tied the Browns. Come off the ledge. As for our record when Jimmy stepped in, it's September 2018 not October 2017. We are not 0-9. The direction could also be down.

You think we're a better team than the Steelers

Oh that's rich

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
I'm judging the GM on the direction of the team. The direction is up. As for not likely, your opinion, but it was pretty much all but a formality Cousins was coming here until JG was traded here. And if you think the team is still garbage, just keep watching.

Well the direction can only be up. What was our record when Jimmy stepped in?

We're better run than the Browns, that's about all we've proven so far

We beat the Lions, but not better than the Lions? Have you seen the Cards this year? The Raiders? The Bills? Pittsburgh? Yes the Steelers that tied the Browns. Come off the ledge. As for our record when Jimmy stepped in, it's September 2018 not October 2017. We are not 0-9. The direction could also be down.

You think we're a better team than the Steelers

Oh that's rich

If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

Steelers have one of the best track records of success. Just because they tied the Browns doesn't mean suddenly they are a bad franchise

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

Steelers have one of the best track records of success. Just because they tied the Browns doesn't mean suddenly they are a bad franchise

I am talking about where they stand currently, not as a franchise. Regardless of how they have performed, they have not looked good as a team this year. It's like folks want to change the standard to fit their own narrative. Now, can you answer my question. If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

And I have another to add. If the 49ers looked like the Los Angeles Rams in weeks 1 and 2, would you still consider them a bad team because we have had a poor track record of success for the better part of 20 years? Just trying to figure out what standards are you going by to judge a team. Or better yet, are the Rams a bad team because they haven't had the greatest track record recently if you overlook last season?

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

I am talking about where they stand currently, not as a franchise. Regardless of how they have performed, they have not looked good as a team this year. It's like folks want to change the standard to fit their own narrative. Now, can you answer my question. If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

And I have another to add. If the 49ers looked like the Los Angeles Rams in weeks 1 and 2, would you still consider them a bad team because we have had a poor track record of success for the better part of 20 years? Just trying to figure out what standards are you going by to judge a team. Or better yet, are the Rams a bad team because they haven't had the greatest track record recently if you overlook last season?

Lol I'm not moving goal posts. You're judging a franchise's direction on the first 2 weeks

Why answer a stupid hypothetical? What if 49ers lose every game the rest of the year? I'd never ask such a dumb hypo

49ers should have lost last week when Jimmy threw a pick. We got fortunate Refs called holding, doesn't change the fact Jimmy made a game losing error

No reason to say we've accomplished anything on the 2 games this year

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
I am talking about where they stand currently, not as a franchise. Regardless of how they have performed, they have not looked good as a team this year. It's like folks want to change the standard to fit their own narrative. Now, can you answer my question. If the 49ers tied the Browns and then lost in week 2, how would you assess the team?

And I have another to add. If the 49ers looked like the Los Angeles Rams in weeks 1 and 2, would you still consider them a bad team because we have had a poor track record of success for the better part of 20 years? Just trying to figure out what standards are you going by to judge a team. Or better yet, are the Rams a bad team because they haven't had the greatest track record recently if you overlook last season?

Lol I'm not moving goal posts. You're judging a franchise's direction on the first 2 weeks

Why answer a stupid hypothetical? What if 49ers lose every game the rest of the year? I'd never ask such a dumb hypo

49ers should have lost last week when Jimmy threw a pick. We got fortunate Refs called holding, doesn't change the fact Jimmy made a game losing error

No reason to say we've accomplished anything on the 2 games this year

Should have lost? Oh dear. And you're talking about hypotheticals. All I'm saying is we've accomplished being 1-1. We've accomplished being a middle of the pack team. I'm judging the franchises direction over the last 18 months. You said the only thing we've proven is that we're better run than the Browns, so that would make us second to last. So for you, the Bills, better run. The Cardinals, better run. The Raiders, better run. You favor all of those teams directions, front offices, etc to the 49ers. I understand now.

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:

Should have lost? Oh dear. And you're talking about hypotheticals. All I'm saying is we've accomplished being 1-1. We've accomplished being a middle of the pack team. I'm judging the franchises direction over the last 18 months. You said the only thing we've proven is that we're better run than the Browns, so that would make us second to last. So for you, the Bills, better run. The Cardinals, better run. The Raiders, better run. You favor all of those teams directions, front offices, etc to the 49ers. I understand now.

Dear lord, Browns was an example to make a point. Not a complete list

Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:

Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
Should have lost? Oh dear. And you're talking about hypotheticals. All I'm saying is we've accomplished being 1-1. We've accomplished being a middle of the pack team. I'm judging the franchises direction over the last 18 months. You said the only thing we've proven is that we're better run than the Browns, so that would make us second to last. So for you, the Bills, better run. The Cardinals, better run. The Raiders, better run. You favor all of those teams directions, front offices, etc to the 49ers. I understand now.

Dear lord, Browns was an example to make a point. Not a complete list

I'll be honest, I can never tell with the webzone. There so much doom and gloom on here at times that if someone says the only team we're run better than is the Browns, I'm not sure whether to believe them, take it as sarcasm, or in your case, just take it as a general point. I've never seen a reaction like this after a win where the offense put up 30 points in an ugly game. Ugly offensive games for us used to by 6 to 13 points or God forbid, a shutout.

We're as good as the Patriots and Eagles.