Originally posted by cwilson830:
2 and 3:
2013: 92 for 524. Average of 5.7
2014: 104 for 639. Average of 6.1
6.1 > 5.7
1: If the 10th best QB rating isn't "good" then how would you define "good?" Top 5?
Designed runs man.
There are 490 users in the forums
Originally posted by cwilson830:
2 and 3:
2013: 92 for 524. Average of 5.7
2014: 104 for 639. Average of 6.1
6.1 > 5.7
1: If the 10th best QB rating isn't "good" then how would you define "good?" Top 5?
Originally posted by cwilson830:
Every QB does worse under pressure than non-pressured.
One of Big Ben's claims to fame is he is only moderately worse under pressure than non-pressured.
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by cwilson830:
2 and 3:
2013: 92 for 524. Average of 5.7
2014: 104 for 639. Average of 6.1
6.1 > 5.7
1: If the 10th best QB rating isn't "good" then how would you define "good?" Top 5?
Designed runs man.
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Of QBs who took the majority of snaps in 2014, the 3 who took the longest to throw the ball were.
1. Russell Wilson
2. Colin Kaepernick
3. Aaron Rodgers
You want to make the claim Rodgers holds onto the ball and doesn't have a quick release?
There's more to the stat then simply holding the ball. Mobility, deeper route combinations, and play-action passing are just a few ways certain QBs will take longer to throw the ball on average.
Originally posted by SofaKing:
Of QBs who took the majority of snaps in 2014, the 3 who took the longest to throw the ball were.
1. Russell Wilson
2. Colin Kaepernick
3. Aaron Rodgers
You want to make the claim Rodgers holds onto the ball and doesn't have a quick release?
There's more to the stat then simply holding the ball. Mobility, deeper route combinations, and play-action passing are just a few ways certain QBs will take longer to throw the ball on average.
Originally posted by cwilson830:
Designed runs don't count as runs?
Stop trolling.
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Thank you for adding perspective! Whenever I see stats with no meaningful comparisons it makes me question the intent of the post. Often when context is added through comparisons the original point seems to be washed away by a sea of logic!
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Thank you for adding perspective! Whenever I see stats with no meaningful comparisons it makes me question the intent of the post. Often when context is added through comparisons the original point seems to be washed away by a sea of logic!
Stop being smug for a moment and read post #10266.
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Thank you for adding perspective! Whenever I see stats with no meaningful comparisons it makes me question the intent of the post. Often when context is added through comparisons the original point seems to be washed away by a sea of logic!
Stop being smug for a moment and read post #10266.
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by cwilson830:
Designed runs don't count as runs?
Stop trolling.
I'm speaking about Kap's designed runs. Do you know how to read?
http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/kaepernick-not-running-less-just-less-successful
he actually ran more in 2014, he just suffered a drastic reduction in yards per attempt.
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Not being smug, just thanking someone for adding context that makes sense to me. You might try to be less touchy.
Originally posted by cwilson830:
Your quote:
he actually ran more in 2014, he just suffered a drastic reduction in yards per attempt.
You you even know how to read..... your own posts?
Troll.
Originally posted by Stud:
LOL. Tom Brady is the best QB in the league with 4 Super Bowls because he can pass in the pocket. Comparing him to Kap is absolutely absurd in every sense.
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by cwilson830:
Your quote:
he actually ran more in 2014, he just suffered a drastic reduction in yards per attempt.
You you even know how to read..... your own posts?
Troll.
I told you I'm talking about designed runs. Again, do you know how to read? That's why I linked the article in the original post. I'll do it for you again:
http://www.csnbayarea.com/49ers/kaepernick-not-running-less-just-less-successful
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Originally posted by Phil-2:
Originally posted by dtg_9er:
Thank you for adding perspective! Whenever I see stats with no meaningful comparisons it makes me question the intent of the post. Often when context is added through comparisons the original point seems to be washed away by a sea of logic!
Stop being smug for a moment and read post #10266.
Not being smug, just thanking someone for adding context that makes sense to me. You might try to be less touchy.