Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 615 users in the forums

Colin Kaepernick Thread

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by harryj:
Right away I have to disagree at halftime we were down by over 20kaep had less than 100 yards

By the end of the game we didn't even reach pitsburg half time point total

And over 80 % of offensive production came in 2nd half when game was over

Pittsburgh owned our D and scored on 4 of their first 5 drives I believe. Kaep's yardage had more to do with a) not having the ball and 2) an ridiculous amount of drops.

Far different than being flat out BAD for the entire game then being productive on your final drive. It's splitting hairs anyways, Kaep has never been a "pad stats" player or are you disagreeing with that?
Originally posted by Blindfury:
Originally posted by jedediahyork:
LMAO. Meanwhile you pick stats only YOU want to include. Double standard much? Did I say Gabbert was the answer? No, I said he's putting up better stats than Kap. You just can't seem to understand that, though in your man crush for him.

Expected response.

Yawn. Your nonsense is becoming dull and repetitive. I think I'll leave you to your Kap fapping now. #1 fan.
Originally posted by Buchy:
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
Originally posted by Kense:
It's obvious what your implications are, the problem is that Gabbert gets most of his yards in Garbage time when the D has let up. So comparing his 7.1 yardage to QB's on superior teams is pointless and shows nothing.

Interesting take... Lets say Ill agree with you on this post, But first you need to agree with yourself, and lets see if you do.

Now that thats said, lets see if you practice what you preach shall we? Kaepernick vs Pittsburgh. 335 yards 2 TD's 0 INTs. Are those stats garbage time stats or are those real stats? If you answered Garbage time stats, horray, you are objective and not emotionally attached to Kap. If you answered REAL stats, thats a RED light for failure and Unfortunately ill have to try to bypass your posts about kaepernick anymore because there wont be any point to even post logic to your posts.

The reason I say you failed if you picked real stats is considering in that game kaepernick had what was it again? Less than 50 yards passing at half time? 2nd half we were already losing 30-3 or 29-3 one of the two, and he put up over 250+ yards 2nd half when we were already completely blown out of the water and headed for a big Loss. Pittsburgh defense went from kicking the Sh*t out of us, to playing prevent defense giving us free passes all half long. That is called garbage time stats.

All in all your post is great, I just hope it applys to every Quarterback and not just the one who took YOUR favorite Quarterbacks position.


That's nice but completely overlooks the play-calling in the first half vs Pittsburgh which was so conservative even the tea party rejected it. By that I mean we were 30 points down and still not going for it on 4th and short and still calling largely run plays.

So when you evaluate Gabbert as Kaepernick's replacement you don't look at the hideous play calling he gets in the first half? You think he calls his own plays in the second half when we are behind. Sorry but that is a freaking lame analysis. It just goes to show your bias.
  • Stud
  • Member
  • Posts: 5,264
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
Originally posted by Kense:
It's obvious what your implications are, the problem is that Gabbert gets most of his yards in Garbage time when the D has let up. So comparing his 7.1 yardage to QB's on superior teams is pointless and shows nothing.

Interesting take... Lets say Ill agree with you on this post, But first you need to agree with yourself, and lets see if you do.

Now that thats said, lets see if you practice what you preach shall we? Kaepernick vs Pittsburgh. 335 yards 2 TD's 0 INTs. Are those stats garbage time stats or are those real stats? If you answered Garbage time stats, horray, you are objective and not emotionally attached to Kap. If you answered REAL stats, thats a RED light for failure and Unfortunately ill have to try to bypass your posts about kaepernick anymore because there wont be any point to even post logic to your posts.

The reason I say you failed if you picked real stats is considering in that game kaepernick had what was it again? Less than 50 yards passing at half time? 2nd half we were already losing 30-3 or 29-3 one of the two, and he put up over 250+ yards 2nd half when we were already completely blown out of the water and headed for a big Loss. Pittsburgh defense went from kicking the Sh*t out of us, to playing prevent defense giving us free passes all half long. That is called garbage time stats.

All in all your post is great, I just hope it applys to every Quarterback and not just the one who took YOUR favorite Quarterbacks position.

Well said.
Originally posted by BobS:
Originally posted by Blindfury:
Originally posted by jedediahyork:
And the play calling has changed how, exactly? Seems to me the play calling is still just as conservative as ever...

Gabbert fits this "philosophy" if that's what you want to call it a hell of a lot better than Kaep. Gabbert is a conservative player and is playing to stay alive. Kaep is a play to win player. Always looking downfield. I have no doubt with a dynamic play-caller who could take advantage of Kaep's strengths we'd see different results...of course we'd need decent players around Kaep. I see nothing from Gabbert. He's no different than Matt Cassel or any of the other backups that on occasion make a nice play. Problem here is when Gabbert made one or 2 nice plays, this place used those plays and projected them to him being more than he is.
No argument there. Looking downfield to the one receiver he has locked on waiting to get open.

This. It would be different if he were looking downfield first and worked his way to other progressions, ultimately dumping it off if guys were covered. It would also be different if he had better peripheral vision. Kap will get you big plays, but if those plays are covered, he's toast. If we had him under a cheap deal, I'd want the team to get a real QB coach to develop him, but you can't be in development when you are paid more than 3 million a season.
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
This. It would be different if he were looking downfield first and worked his way to other progressions, ultimately dumping it off if guys were covered. It would also be different if he had better peripheral vision. Kap will get you big plays, but if those plays are covered, he's toast. If we had him under a cheap deal, I'd want the team to get a real QB coach to develop him, but you can't be in development when you are paid more than 3 million a season.

I think teaching him to check the ball down is a pretty easy task. There seems to be no other fanbase that's enamored with checking the ball down. I mean, Gabbert was earning praise mainly from his propensity to check the ball down early and often. Until people realized that doesn't win you games. Just keeps the rating high.
[ Edited by Blindfury on Dec 24, 2015 at 8:03 PM ]
Originally posted by Blindfury:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
This. It would be different if he were looking downfield first and worked his way to other progressions, ultimately dumping it off if guys were covered. It would also be different if he had better peripheral vision. Kap will get you big plays, but if those plays are covered, he's toast. If we had him under a cheap deal, I'd want the team to get a real QB coach to develop him, but you can't be in development when you are paid more than 3 million a season.

I think teaching him to check the ball down is a pretty easy task. There seems to be no other fanbase that's enamored with checking the ball down. I mean, Gabbert was earning praise mainly from his propensity to check the ball down early and often. Until people realized that doesn't win you games. Just keeps the rating high.

Unless you're the NE fans. Brady throws, "checkdown" passes all the time. Much like Montana and Young did. The, "checkdown" throws, I'm assuming are the short curls, swing passes, short outs, drags, snag and hook routes. Those are all staple WCO routes that Bill Walsh rElie heavily upon. What made his offense so dangerous was that they incorporated the deep routes with underneath, complimentary routes that; if you took away the deep play, it left an athlete open in space. That way, there was always the possibility-not necessarily the guarantee, of the big play. To quote Bill Walsh- "out offense is one designed so that we will first look for the big play, but still have the ability to move the ball and get it into the hands of our playmaker if the big play isn't there."

Personally, we've seen 4 years of kaep not,"getting it" to move to his checkdown quickly enough, or at all, to keep the offense moving. It's often feast or famine with him. You can't tell me it's coaching because both the guy before him and after him have, as the fans say, "check the ball down too much" so, when 2/3 qb's checkdown too much amd the other not at all-its not coaching. That's personal decision s by the qb's themselves.
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Unless you're the NE fans. Brady throws, "checkdown" passes all the time. Much like Montana and Young did. The, "checkdown" throws, I'm assuming are the short curls, swing passes, short outs, drags, snag and hook routes. Those are all staple WCO routes that Bill Walsh rElie heavily upon. What made his offense so dangerous was that they incorporated the deep routes with underneath, complimentary routes that; if you took away the deep play, it left an athlete open in space. That way, there was always the possibility-not necessarily the guarantee, of the big play. To quote Bill Walsh- "out offense is one designed so that we will first look for the big play, but still have the ability to move the ball and get it into the hands of our playmaker if the big play isn't there."

Personally, we've seen 4 years of kaep not,"getting it" to move to his checkdown quickly enough, or at all, to keep the offense moving. It's often feast or famine with him. You can't tell me it's coaching because both the guy before him and after him have, as the fans say, "check the ball down too much" so, when 2/3 qb's checkdown too much amd the other not at all-its not coaching. That's personal decision s by the qb's themselves.

I see nothing conservative or limited in Brady's game. There's a difference between a QB who CAN beat a defense all over the field checking the ball down when need be and a QB who checks the ball down with the slightest hint of pressure. I don't see how any of what you said relates to GAbbert. He does not play anything like the QB's you named.

I disagree with your assessment on Kaep. Personally think a lot of the claims are lazy because there are too many absolutes. Like Kaep can't and hasn't moved the offense on long 10 play drives. Like he hasn't checked the ball down. I mean, how can you even say stuff like this an expect to be taken seriously. Kaep's problem is he doesn't check the ball down enough...not that he never checks the ball down. Like he hasn't moved the offense without looking for the big play.

Plus, there's a difference between designed, short routes and a QB checking the ball down at the first hint of pressure and using that to move the offense. WCO has nothing to do with Gabbert throwing short of the sticks on 3rd down. The issue is not with checkdowns. It's this fascination with checkdowns here. Checkdowns do not move the ball and get you 1st downs. Designed, short routes? Sure. But checkdowns? Not often.
[ Edited by Blindfury on Dec 24, 2015 at 9:18 PM ]
Well I, for one, hope Gabbert can learn to stare down the one receiver going ten yards or more every play and throw it to him no matter what. Who cares if there's one or more guys draped all over him.
[ Edited by jedediahyork on Dec 24, 2015 at 11:11 PM ]
well said jd. kap cant really move on from his first read quickly so he keeps hoping.
Gabbert and Kap both equally suck! Time to move on
Originally posted by PrisonOfGlass:
First.
Originally posted by Kense:
Originally posted by SundayTicket:
Interesting take... Lets say Ill agree with you on this post, But first you need to agree with yourself, and lets see if you do.

Now that thats said, lets see if you practice what you preach shall we? Kaepernick vs Pittsburgh. 335 yards 2 TD's 0 INTs. Are those stats garbage time stats or are those real stats? If you answered Garbage time stats, horray, you are objective and not emotionally attached to Kap. If you answered REAL stats, thats a RED light for failure and Unfortunately ill have to try to bypass your posts about kaepernick anymore because there wont be any point to even post logic to your posts.

The reason I say you failed if you picked real stats is considering in that game kaepernick had what was it again? Less than 50 yards passing at half time? 2nd half we were already losing 30-3 or 29-3 one of the two, and he put up over 250+ yards 2nd half when we were already completely blown out of the water and headed for a big Loss. Pittsburgh defense went from kicking the Sh*t out of us, to playing prevent defense giving us free passes all half long. That is called garbage time stats.

All in all your post is great, I just hope it applys to every Quarterback and not just the one who took YOUR favorite Quarterbacks position.

What's your point? The game was already out of reach most of those stats were garbage time. However Kap is a proven winner and has lead the team in comebacks in major games. You wont acknowledge that. Gabbert is doing nothing but playing from behind and is getting worse. Garbage time or not Kapernick completed over 70% of his passes in that pittsburgh game. According to you he's not accurate. You also ignore the coaching that first half. Why does only Gabbert get all the excuses about bad coaching ?

Who gives gabbert excuses? Not me. Dudes been sucking.. You have alot of assumptions in your post. Because I think kaepernick sucks doesn't mean I think gabbert is good lol.
I hope Kap blasts some 2pac "I ain't mad at cha", converts to Islam, goes to the NY Jets and wins superbowl 51!
Originally posted by jonnydel:
Originally posted by Blindfury:
Originally posted by LifelongNiner:
This. It would be different if he were looking downfield first and worked his way to other progressions, ultimately dumping it off if guys were covered. It would also be different if he had better peripheral vision. Kap will get you big plays, but if those plays are covered, he's toast. If we had him under a cheap deal, I'd want the team to get a real QB coach to develop him, but you can't be in development when you are paid more than 3 million a season.

I think teaching him to check the ball down is a pretty easy task. There seems to be no other fanbase that's enamored with checking the ball down. I mean, Gabbert was earning praise mainly from his propensity to check the ball down early and often. Until people realized that doesn't win you games. Just keeps the rating high.

Unless you're the NE fans. Brady throws, "checkdown" passes all the time. Much like Montana and Young did. The, "checkdown" throws, I'm assuming are the short curls, swing passes, short outs, drags, snag and hook routes. Those are all staple WCO routes that Bill Walsh rElie heavily upon. What made his offense so dangerous was that they incorporated the deep routes with underneath, complimentary routes that; if you took away the deep play, it left an athlete open in space. That way, there was always the possibility-not necessarily the guarantee, of the big play. To quote Bill Walsh- "out offense is one designed so that we will first look for the big play, but still have the ability to move the ball and get it into the hands of our playmaker if the big play isn't there."

Personally, we've seen 4 years of kaep not,"getting it" to move to his checkdown quickly enough, or at all, to keep the offense moving. It's often feast or famine with him. You can't tell me it's coaching because both the guy before him and after him have, as the fans say, "check the ball down too much" so, when 2/3 qb's checkdown too much amd the other not at all-its not coaching. That's personal decision s by the qb's themselves.

still waiting for you to break down Gabbert's performances against the Bears, Browns, and Bengals. I know you've been busy.. but hopefully you have free time soon or after the season.

as far as your post...
Alex got replaced in mid season because he "check down too much", where as Kap threw the ball beyond the sticks.

as far as you saying he isn't coached to look for the big play, even at the expense of losing checkdown opportunities...and he's doing it on his own..

Logan said. "You can take a young man, put him in an offense and really encourage him to hit the check down. Then suddenly you look up and he's completing 68 or 70 percent of his passes and that's wonderful.

"But what did you sacrifice to get that done. Well now we don't have a vertical passing game. You have to be careful with completion percentage."

Logan has already spoke with Kaepernick about sacrificing his completion percentage to put more points on the board.

"One day I was talking to Colin while watching some Arizona film. Now what does Arizona do? They pressure, pressure, pressure," Logan said. "So I said, 'Colin, in games like this, we've got to be willing to sacrifice completion percentage for explosion plays.'

"Just imagine he goes out there and completes three explosion plays to give us 21 points and comes out of the game 48 percent complete. Well, let's go have a glass of wine. I'm good to go."

a glass of wine would've went well with an Offensive line that allowed this approach they wanted to take.

there is a disconnect there somewhere with the QB Coach, OC, and Head Coach. I don't know who is in charge of making changes to personnel. Kap has always been known to followed exactly what his coaches have wanted him to do, on the field...off the field, like keeping mum with reporters, at the expense of his perceived character. If his coaches wanted him to checkdown more often, he would have.
[ Edited by Afrikan on Dec 25, 2015 at 1:50 AM ]
  • BobS
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 12,143
How much lower can Kap fans go? It seemed two years ago when he was putting up borderline top 10 numbers they were calling him elite and comparing him to Steve Young. Now they are arguing to the death he is better than a $2 mil scrub Blaine Gabbert.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone