Originally posted by thl408:
I just read what Cossell wrote again and it said the play was a sack. Oops. I'll take another look tomorrow.
I just looked at all the sacks from this game (6).
Sack #1: 1Q - On 3rd and 10, the SEA comes with cover1 sending 5 man pressure. Boone is shoved back into the pocket and Kap runs around to get sacked for -3. Cosell is not talking about this play.
Sack #2:
post#76 - If Cosell is talking about this play, it's a bit harsh. VD might have been targeted, but it's versus Sherman who is lanky and had his hips turned running with VD. I'm not gonna fault Kap here.
Sack #3:
post#83 - This might be the play Cosell is talking about. I thought Kap could have pulled the trigger and got rid of the ball, but a tad harsh of an assessment.
Sack #4: 3Q 3rd & 9: SEA sends 6 man pressure. Kap gets pressure in his face just as he completes his dropback. Cosell is not talking about this play.
Sack #5: 3Q 3rd & 10: SEA sends 5 man pressure and plays man coverage. 49ers run the same concepts in
post#55. In the play here, the 49ers mess up on route running as the Mesh concept almost collides with one another (Lloyd+Crabs). Boldin's intermediate crosser could have been available, but the play never gets a chance to develop due to pressure. Cosell is not talking about this play.
Sack #6: 4Q 2nd & 10: SEA sends 5 man pressure and Kap is pressured immediately as he completes his dropback. Cosell is not talking about this play.
So either Cosell is talking about Sack #3, which is a little harsh, or he is talking about the play in
post#87 which wasn't a sack, but a scramble. I think Cosell misspoke and thought it was a sack. Sail concept is a good cover3 buster and Kap did not allow the concept to develop before moving away from it.