Should Baalke make a trade? | Page 9

Oct 19, 2014 at 1:29 PM

sdaddy101269
Veteran
Posts: 4,736

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by sdaddy101269:
I Disagree. We don't need the speedy back we need a WR that can take the top off of the defense. Jackson is fast with a big body, something we don't have.

49ers have more WR's than they can get the ball to right now. Also, explain how you afford Jackson's contract, 49ers would need about $6 million in cap space to afford him. He's a nonstarter as far as I'm concerned.

I know we can't afford and wouldn't pay a guy like Jackson. I'm saying we need that more than Spiller, who by the way just broke his collar bone so he's out. If Jackson would restructure his contract, to around 8 million /yr I'd rather have him and Stevie than Crabtree and Stevie.

Oct 19, 2014 at 2:41 PM

#122

dtg_9er
Veteran
Posts: 33,204

Originally posted by cciowa:
no. our team is progressing well and soon other guys will be back. i am sure if we lose tonight there will be all sorts of hand wringing and wrist slashing but no. there is no reason to bring anyone new into the fold.

Agree! If there is an injury then maybe but right now the team is jelling and a lot of guys will be returning today or soon...Bowman, Willis, Dorsey, A Davis, VD, Brock...

There are quite a few teams that would love to trade for either Spiller or Jackson even if they have to wait until next year to use the former. Those teams can and will offer more than Baalke is likely to offer.

Oct 19, 2014 at 2:51 PM

#123

24plus25er
Veteran
Posts: 2,180

Stay put, once all our horses are in the stable it's off to the races.

Oct 19, 2014 at 3:00 PM

#124

Butter
Veteran
Posts: 2,356

I think Vincent is a pipe dream. But, he wojkd be a nice addition. It seems like Kaep is willing to make risky throws where he gives the WR a chane to make a play. A player like Vjax would be a nice option for that kind of scenario.

Oct 19, 2014 at 3:09 PM

#125

Oakland-Niner
Member
Posts: 24,062

Truth is, when our roster is fully healthy, its really hard to "upgrade." We are still oozing with talent.

Oct 19, 2014 at 3:12 PM

#126

hondakillerzx
Veteran
Posts: 19,123

if we do it better be for some decent o lineman or d line depth but i think we'll be ok with all the injured/suspended players coming back soon

Oct 19, 2014 at 3:13 PM

#127

LasVegasWally
Veteran
Posts: 24,308

Staying "pat" sounds pretty smart.

Oct 19, 2014 at 3:25 PM

#128

Phoenix49ers
Moderator
Posts: 119,742

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
Billy Beane says get Cespedes back

Lol this. As an A's fan, Id say it might be wise to stick with the guys you have, hard to integrate someone on to a team in midseason anyways.

Oct 19, 2014 at 4:35 PM

#129

5timechamps
Veteran
Posts: 1,990

Yes

Oct 19, 2014 at 4:57 PM

#130

ads_2006
Veteran
Posts: 56,643

Should trade what seems to be a big mistake in tank carraridine

Oct 19, 2014 at 5:19 PM

#131

Olejohnnyboy
Veteran
Posts: 474

No, we should stand pat. We don't have any money to sign anyone worth while. Plus, draft picks are move valuable than ever due to the fact is a great source for talent on the cheap.

Oct 19, 2014 at 5:20 PM

#132

jrouter4949
Veteran
Posts: 2,588

Originally posted by ads_2006:
Should trade what seems to be a big mistake in tank carraridine

tRADE tANK bASED ON WHAT?

Oct 19, 2014 at 5:24 PM

#133

ads_2006
Veteran
Posts: 56,643

Originally posted by jrouter4949:

Originally posted by ads_2006:
Should trade what seems to be a big mistake in tank carraridine

tRADE tANK bASED ON WHAT?

could fetch a mid round pick 4-6th

we seem to have no problem playing those dudes

Oct 19, 2014 at 7:39 PM

#134

15crabtree
Member
Posts: 723

For a big body speedy wr

Oct 19, 2014 at 8:23 PM

#135

Butter
Veteran
Posts: 2,356

Niners are down to 3 healthy CB. Manning torched Brock all game. Nope, they dont need any help in their secondary.

[ Edited by Butter on Oct 19, 2014 at 8:24 PM ]