Originally posted by HaiGuise:
A.![]()
B.![]()
Being the greedy SOB that I am, damn your scenario, I pick C both. Oh wait we were talking about smith?
There are 1,900 users in the forums
Originally posted by HaiGuise:
A.![]()
B.![]()
Since when has ANY player been more important than the team??Originally posted by JC49:Originally posted by HaiGuise:
A.![]()
B.![]()
B
Originally posted by Norcal9erfan:
This thread is ridiculous!Since when has ANY player been more important than the team??
Anyone who votes for A) should seriously look into re-evaluating their man-crush on Mr. Long Lashes!
Originally posted by ramanz16:
Who in their right mind would vote A???

Originally posted by 49erForLife420:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
Dude why is everyone in love with Nate Davis.. HE HASNT PROVED ANYTHING AND HE WILL MOST LIKELY NOT
Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
Ahh but logic says if Smith blows up this next year, it is highly likely that success would continue.
For the sake of argument, how many defensive teams remain yearly contenders? Now go and compare that to teams with a highly productive QB.
Just because you assumed that the scenarios presented meant only one spectacular season for Smith is your fault. Also clearly present's your bias against Smith, so your debate would be worthless, cause you have already proven to not have an open mind. You can't debate a person who already has their mind made up. Well you can, but what's the point?
Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
All right now we are talking. I agree with you about Smith's having one good year and not meaning anything for the future which also holds true for us going 11-5 and making the playoffs. With a bad QB we could go back to worse than we are now since we don't yet know what we have in Davis.
I'm aware my argument was flawed, the original options just left so much open for just these kinds of questions that I was playing devil's advocate. If Smith did have such a year I believe that it would be unlikely we would go 8-8 unless Willis, Gore, and a few more starters went down.
I just have been a 49 fan for so long and suffered thru the years before 1980
that I don't believe in one year success. It would have been better if I had said that but I was just having some fun.
I don't care what Smiths #'s are or if he is even our QB as long as we win long term and just not 1 season.
Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
All right now we are talking. I agree with you about Smith's having one good year and not meaning anything for the future which also holds true for us going 11-5 and making the playoffs. With a bad QB we could go back to worse than we are now since we don't yet know what we have in Davis.
I'm aware my argument was flawed, the original options just left so much open for just these kinds of questions that I was playing devil's advocate. If Smith did have such a year I believe that it would be unlikely we would go 8-8 unless Willis, Gore, and a few more starters went down.
I just have been a 49 fan for so long and suffered thru the years before 1980
that I don't believe in one year success. It would have been better if I had said that but I was just having some fun.
I don't care what Smiths #'s are or if he is even our QB as long as we win long term and just not 1 season.
It's all good, man. Everyone sees things differently and my views are based solely on the direct options given: playoffs or no playoffs. I found it difficult to believe anyone would actually choose the "no playoffs" option as a fan of this team. We all come from didn't perspectives.

Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
Ahh but logic says if Smith blows up this next year, it is highly likely that success would continue.
For the sake of argument, how many defensive teams remain yearly contenders? Now go and compare that to teams with a highly productive QB.
Just because you assumed that the scenarios presented meant only one spectacular season for Smith is your fault. Also clearly present's your bias against Smith, so your debate would be worthless, cause you have already proven to not have an open mind. You can't debate a person who already has their mind made up. Well you can, but what's the point?
You're fool if you think a big season from a QB automatically means sustained success. Ever heard of Matt Cassell? And you're seriously going to try to tell ME how I feel about Alex Smith? Get the f*ck out of here. I hope he succeeds, because the reality is a monster season from a QB with a defense like ours will all but guarantee a playoff run. BUT, the two scenarios presented do not offer room for such logic. Get it?
By the way, it's funny how whenever anyone has an open mind and is willing to accept the fact that our beloved number one overall pick has issues that need to be fixed, we get labeled Smith haters with closed minds. What a joke.
Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by WINiner:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by Born49R:Originally posted by 49erRider:Originally posted by fortyninerglory:
A: Alex Smith has a breakout year with ridiculous stats but the Niner's go 8-8 and miss the playoffs.
B: Niners go 11-5 and make the playoffs but Alex Smith shows no signs of improvement over last year and has a mediocre season at the QB position.
This is a dumb question. Who the hell would want option A? The goal is to make the playoffs, not to make Smith look good. Chances are, though, if Smith had such a big season, we WOULD make the playoffs and would have a much better record than 8-8. But just going by your scenario, anybody wanting option A is an idiot.
Option B is realistic and will likely be exactly what happens this season (besides the 11-5 record, as we will likely be 9-7 or 10-6).
Thank you for calling me an idiot instead of disagreeing with my argument. I love it when zoners show their inability to argue logically and instead resort to name calling.
I realized that was a bit harsh and edited the post to exclude any insults before you posted. Check the times. On top of that, I didn't even read your post, so I wasn't aware you were arguing for option A. If I was, I would have called you out directly. If you want to get into a real debate, we can do that.
The two scenarios presented mention nothing of sustained success for Alex Smith if he has a monster season this year. Get that argument off the table. The question is whether you'd like to see Smith light it up and MISS THE PLAYOFFS, or actually do what we're supposed to be trying to do every year and MAKE THE PLAYOFFS. If you'd rather miss the playoffs just to see big numbers from Smith, I can do nothing but question your true status as a 49ERS FAN.
Keep in mind a monster year (numbers-wise) from any QB DOES NOT guarantee sustained success. That was not mentioned in the two scenarios, therefor it should have no bearing on this debate. What you implied was that a big year from Smith will mean we have our franchise QB, which is not true. I get your argument, it's just not a good one. Drafting later in the draft doesn't mean we won't find a franchise QB. There's also trades that can be made. On top of that, we may have what we're looking for in Nate Davis.
Ahh but logic says if Smith blows up this next year, it is highly likely that success would continue.
For the sake of argument, how many defensive teams remain yearly contenders? Now go and compare that to teams with a highly productive QB.
Just because you assumed that the scenarios presented meant only one spectacular season for Smith is your fault. Also clearly present's your bias against Smith, so your debate would be worthless, cause you have already proven to not have an open mind. You can't debate a person who already has their mind made up. Well you can, but what's the point?
You're fool if you think a big season from a QB automatically means sustained success. Ever heard of Matt Cassell? And you're seriously going to try to tell ME how I feel about Alex Smith? Get the f*ck out of here. I hope he succeeds, because the reality is a monster season from a QB with a defense like ours will all but guarantee a playoff run. BUT, the two scenarios presented do not offer room for such logic. Get it?
By the way, it's funny how whenever anyone has an open mind and is willing to accept the fact that our beloved number one overall pick has issues that need to be fixed, we get labeled Smith haters with closed minds. What a joke.
Originally posted by IDontGetNaked:
B = Success, but with lack of stability with QB. Not quite that easy to remedy.
A = Solidified QB with success, what were the parameters for our 8-8 record? Poor back field play, lackluster field special teams play? Whatever choice, it's going to be easier to remedy than finding a franchise QB.
Long term I think B is a much better idea. We're not going far into the playoffs without solid QB play. I could care less about one playoff appearance above finding true success at QB.