Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 377 users in the forums

Kentwan balmer to IR

Shop Find 49ers gear online
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Not sure if Jackson would have helped JTO. The dude tends to throw it to the guys in the other jerseys, but Jackson would definitely help Hill look like a legit NFL qb
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Not sure if Jackson would have helped JTO. The dude tends to throw it to the guys in the other jerseys, but Jackson would definitely help Hill look like a legit NFL qb

jackson is used to running the ball back on a punt not looking back towards the qb and catching his punt.
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Not sure if Jackson would have helped JTO. The dude tends to throw it to the guys in the other jerseys, but Jackson would definitely help Hill look like a legit NFL qb

Jackson stretches the field, he would of been useless with Hill.....Hill could of never gotten the ball far enough to him.
HUGE BUST

Desean Jackson on the other hand......
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.

You're putting words in my mouth, How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss. What I said was, For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR. What I'm implying is his production as a Raider was very low so if you solely judged Moss by his playing time in Oakland you wouldn't think much of him as a WR.

Yes, he has game breaking skills in Philly because McNabb can throw a rope at 35 yards. His effectiveness here pre-Smith would of been mediocre at best. Hill wouldn't of been able to use DeSean as he's being used now so the love affair with these massive plays wouldn't exists because we wouldn't of put him in the position to make them anyways.
Originally posted by NickSh49:
Still should have taken this guy...



I second that, would not have punting return issues and deep treat to go anlong with Crabs!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by WestCoast:
HUGE BUST

Desean Jackson on the other hand......

Please look at post #83.
  • Nuns
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 1,301
KB is under contract with a 5 yr/ 8 million dollar deal (that can balloon to 11 if he reaches incentives).

Even as a back up, that's a decent figure. Give him a year or two to blossom and it's a steal.

I love late first, early 2nd round picks.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.

You're putting words in my mouth, How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss. What I said was, For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR. What I'm implying is his production as a Raider was very low so if you solely judged Moss by his playing time in Oakland you wouldn't think much of him as a WR.

Yes, he has game breaking skills in Philly because McNabb can throw a rope at 35 yards. His effectiveness here pre-Smith would of been mediocre at best. Hill wouldn't of been able to use DeSean as he's being used now so the love affair with these massive plays wouldn't exists because we wouldn't of put him in the position to make them anyways.

Again, so what if he wouldn't be producing the same numbers? Alex is in now isn't he? A playmaker is still a playmaker, and we passed him TWICE for two scrubs. He wanted to play here, Jerry wanted him to play here, he would have filled two needs, but the niners STILL passed him. I don't understand what down playing what might have happened if he were a niner, because talent is still talent, and we got none out of that draft. End of story.

[ Edited by blunt_probe on Dec 14, 2009 at 09:44:58 ]
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.

You're putting words in my mouth, How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss. What I said was, For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR. What I'm implying is his production as a Raider was very low so if you solely judged Moss by his playing time in Oakland you wouldn't think much of him as a WR.

Yes, he has game breaking skills in Philly because McNabb can throw a rope at 35 yards. His effectiveness here pre-Smith would of been mediocre at best. Hill wouldn't of been able to use DeSean as he's being used now so the love affair with these massive plays wouldn't exists because we wouldn't of put him in the position to make them anyways.

Again so what if he wouldn't be producing the same numbers? Alex is in now isn't he? A playmaker is still a playmaker, and we passed him TWICE for two scrubs. He wanted to play here, Jerry wanted him to play here, he would have filled two needs, but the niners STILL passed him. I don't understand what down playing what might have happened if he were a niner, because talent is still talent, and we got none out of that draft. End of story.

moot
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.

You're putting words in my mouth, How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss. What I said was, For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR. What I'm implying is his production as a Raider was very low so if you solely judged Moss by his playing time in Oakland you wouldn't think much of him as a WR.

Yes, he has game breaking skills in Philly because McNabb can throw a rope at 35 yards. His effectiveness here pre-Smith would of been mediocre at best. Hill wouldn't of been able to use DeSean as he's being used now so the love affair with these massive plays wouldn't exists because we wouldn't of put him in the position to make them anyways.

Again so what if he wouldn't be producing the same numbers? Alex is in now isn't he? A playmaker is still a playmaker, and we passed him TWICE for two scrubs. He wanted to play here, Jerry wanted him to play here, he would have filled two needs, but the niners STILL passed him. I don't understand what down playing what might have happened if he were a niner, because talent is still talent, and we got none out of that draft. End of story.

If he was sitting on the bench in Oakland right now would you still want him to start for us?
Yea nothing more to say than that the niners massively dropped the ball on this decision.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by blunt_probe:
Originally posted by jreff22:
Jackson has McNabb throwing him the ball.....Probowl QB. What do you really think Jackson would of done with JTO or Hill at QB? He would of never put up those kinds of numbers, so leave it alone!!

Who cares if it wouldn't be the same numbers? He'd still be our #1 and we would have no PR issue.

People wouldn't be all gaga over him because he wouldn't of put up the same numbers. He looks and is a serious WR because of where he is playing, he wouldn't of had that kind of production here which = less desire. For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR, but its a different story in NE.

What? How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss? No one acts like Moss... He's a playmaker and we could have used him. He was recommended by the G.O.A.T and yet we nabbed Balmer and Chilo instead. You sound as if we actually got a good player in place of DeSean that draft.

You're putting words in my mouth, How can you even begin to say he would act like Moss. What I said was, For instance if you judged Moss of his Raiders years you wouldn't think much of him as a WR. What I'm implying is his production as a Raider was very low so if you solely judged Moss by his playing time in Oakland you wouldn't think much of him as a WR.

Yes, he has game breaking skills in Philly because McNabb can throw a rope at 35 yards. His effectiveness here pre-Smith would of been mediocre at best. Hill wouldn't of been able to use DeSean as he's being used now so the love affair with these massive plays wouldn't exists because we wouldn't of put him in the position to make them anyways.

Again so what if he wouldn't be producing the same numbers? Alex is in now isn't he? A playmaker is still a playmaker, and we passed him TWICE for two scrubs. He wanted to play here, Jerry wanted him to play here, he would have filled two needs, but the niners STILL passed him. I don't understand what down playing what might have happened if he were a niner, because talent is still talent, and we got none out of that draft. End of story.

If he was sitting on the bench in Oakland right now would you still want him to start for us?

What king of argument is that? That's like saying what if Brady never got a chance to start and ended up sitting on the bench for the rest of his life. The point is he was a way better option than Balmer or Chilo. What is so difficult to comprehend about that?
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone