Originally posted by jb49ers80:
Originally posted by Joecool:
It seems that everyone forgets that Drew Brees won the starting job and the team just couldn't find a way to bench him because he was playing well whereas Alex lost the starting job and the team kept looking for another option until Alex was the last resort.
That's a HUGE difference and that's why he's a top QB. Alex kept falling back and couldn't fight through it until he was the last resort and the question of him excelling is huge.
You're entitled to your opinion, but I don't see it as a HUGE difference. Why couldn't what happened to Drew in year 4 happen to Alex next year? He could (probably will) win the starting job and the team won't want to bench him because he's playing so well.
Yes, their situations are not identical, but to not acknowledge any similarities is just silly.
I never said it couldn't happen. I'm just saying that how Brees became good wasn't because he sucked or was benched. His play and mentality kept him on the field despite the fact that the organization wasn't behind him. The organization kept looking to replace him but he kept fighting them off. This personality holds a lot of weight in him becoming the player he is today.
Alex couldn't fight off replacements and from Singletary's mouth, he's too passive. This does not mean Alex won't succeed but it is a big difference from WHY Brees became a top QB as compared to why Alex, if he does, will become a top QB.
Brees put up a fight and won which is what great players do. Alex didn't put up much of a fight and kept losing until he got things catered to him, which isn't really the makeup of a great player.
That's why their paths are completely different. If you wanted to say both of their organizations doubted them, then that's fine but you can say that about almost any QB such as Vince Young.