There are 247 users in the forums
Did Nate Davis Just Win A Roster Spot? (Poll, Please don't merge)
Did Nate Davis Just Win A Roster Spot? (Poll, Please don't merge)
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:46 PM
- zozell
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,961
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:47 PM
- ads_2006
- Veteran
- Posts: 56,464
yes
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:47 PM
- BasharCali49
- Veteran
- Posts: 378
I like Nate a lot. Two good friends of mine who watched Ball State over the past 2 years told me Nate is a steal. I hope they are right.
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM
- toeknee
- Veteran
- Posts: 54,571
it wouldn't be wise to risk him being claimed
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM
- jreff22
- Veteran
- Posts: 65,482
Davis in Huard out...if he can do the same again next week.
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM
- PA9erFaithful
- Veteran
- Posts: 12,444
Rookie QB Nate Davis told his team: "Let's not settle for a field goal." Two plays later, Sheets scored the game-winning points for 49ers.
Nate Davis took out the guesswork. The 49ers drafted him -- no question that they must keep him.
MM's twitter
Nate Davis took out the guesswork. The 49ers drafted him -- no question that they must keep him.
MM's twitter
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:49 PM
- DonJulio
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 23,234
Alex and Shaun are not the odd men out in favor of rookie Nate. No matter how much you love Nate, hate Smith, or hate Hill....just the truth.
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM
- mod
- Veteran
- Posts: 41,088
lol... there already is a poll like this
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:51 PM
- zozell
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,961
Originally posted by DonJulio:
Alex and Shaun are not the odd men out in favor of rookie Nate. No matter how much you love Nate, hate Smith, or hate Hill....just the truth.
Just wanted to put up every possible scenario. I know if i would have left those two choices out... some Smart Alec would have said, "Davis In, Smith Out" ... Just covering my bases
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:52 PM
- 9erfanAUS
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,281
I hope Huard gets cut.
We can't keep 5 RBs/FBs and 4 QBs.
-9fA
We can't keep 5 RBs/FBs and 4 QBs.
-9fA
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:52 PM
- zozell
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,961
Originally posted by modninerfan:
lol... there already is a poll like this
The only one I saw was about him starting in the pre-season. That's a completley different question than the one being polled in this thread...
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:52 PM
- MaliCali
- Veteran
- Posts: 3,400
I wouldnt be suprised to hear the niners start shopping Alex Smith come the start of the season...because if Nate is kept on the 53, it means the team is looking to develope him as a future starter, which where does that put Alex Smith..and if i remember correctly there are a few coaches out there that are very interested in taking a shot at developing him...
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:53 PM
- 9erfanAUS
- Veteran
- Posts: 16,281
Originally posted by MaliCali:
I wouldnt be suprised to hear the niners start shopping Alex Smith come the start of the season...because if Nate is kept on the 53, it means the team is looking to develope him as a future starter, which where does that put Alex Smith..and if i remember correctly there are a few coaches out there that are very interested in taking a shot at developing him...
The 49ers are not going to get anything in return for Alex Smith. He's signed to a two year deal and most GMs will be patient enough to wait it out.
-9fA
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:53 PM
- BasharCali49
- Veteran
- Posts: 378
Originally posted by teeohh:
it wouldn't be wise to risk him being claimed
I would get so mad if we lost Nate for a dumb move like that.
Aug 29, 2009 at 8:53 PM
- mod
- Veteran
- Posts: 41,088
Originally posted by zozell:Originally posted by modninerfan:
lol... there already is a poll like this
The only one I saw was about him starting in the pre-season. That's a completley different question than the one being polled in this thread...
not quite the same but similar idea
http://www.49erswebzone.com/forum/thread.php?num=128734