2026 Schedule Tracker: Known 49ers Games Ahead of the Official Release →

There are 436 users in the forums

Bryce Huff Retired

Shop 49ers game tickets
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,482
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.
Pressures are beneficial but I feel are bloated sacks are better period usually ends up with loss of yards and down a pressure could still go for a TD.

Comparing it to a DB with high ints and giving up plays is just a bad comparison. Completely different
Players with high sack numbers usually have high pressure rates too. I remember for YEARS posters b****ing about Arik Armstead getting to but not being able to sack the qb and now its better?
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,482
Originally posted by Since07:
Players with high sack numbers usually have high pressure rates too. I remember for YEARS posters b****ing about Arik Armstead getting to but not being able to sack the qb and now its better?

Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by tankle104:
Yeah, I feel like some fans don't think about these stats in proper context.

in order to be a top notch pass rusher, you need to be able to consistently get pressures on a qb and find ways to turn 10-20 of those in sacks across a season

it's very important to find ways to disrupt a play on a down by down basis. That's great if you get a sack or 2 sacks in a game but if the other 60 plays you were in on, you did nothing and the offense you're playing wasn't disturbed. That doesn't mean you had a good game.

sometimes a qb can still make a play when pressured but that doesn't mean the pass rusher didn't make a good play, just the qb made a better one. It happens. But you made it hard on them and if you do that consistently, good things usually happen. Most QBs won't over come consistent pressures throughout a game.

It's similar to a DB getting an INt - doesn't mean they had a good game if the other 60 plays they weren't stopping much.


I think the problem with a lot of fans/posters, across all fan bases, is that they don't watch film. Their analysis is based off of just stats, which doesn't tell the whole story.

idk who in here is saying pressures are better than sacks and if they're talking about that in a vacuum? cause that's a weird argument. They're both helpful indicators of a players impact but go together to tell the story.

I saw someone mention Bosa and his 69 pressures. Lol what about all the plays he's double teamed? That's making an impact on that play cause he's freeing up others to be 1-1, or the offense is using a TE to block and that helps the rest of the team in coverage. Or when we do stunts and the d lineman's job is to eat up blockers so others can make the tackle. Etc etc Those things aren't really factored into things like sacks and pressures but are super important to a defenses success.

there is a lot of things these guys do, play in and play out, that positively impacts the game that doesn't show up on the stat sheet.

it's all about making a positive impact on the play. Of course we would love tons of sacks and tons of pressures. Tons of players get clean up sacks cause the rest of the d line got a ton of pressure or when a qb threw a pick cause the qb was pressured.

Bryce huff made a big time impact for the jets in 2022 and 2023, just he didn't get the sacks in 2022. He still was disrupting plays left and right, which helps the defense.

the following is critical to a good defense and idc what anyone is saying "what's better" or "what isn't important"
PFF (Pro Football Focus) defines a quarterback pressure as a play where a defender disrupts the quarterback's ability to throw, even if it doesn't result in a sack. This includes forcing the quarterback to move, hitting them as they throw, or sacking them. In essence, a pressure is any situation where the quarterback is under duress and their ability to execute a pass is negatively impacted.
[ Edited by tankle104 on Jun 5, 2025 at 3:39 PM ]
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.

Still working hard to be wrong I guess.
What great 49er said stats are for pussies and all those sacks that Aldon Smith got were the result of the other Smith doing his job and the dirty work.
Originally posted by saj4423:
What great 49er said stats are for pussies and all those sacks that Aldon Smith got were the result of the other Smith doing his job and the dirty work.

That's not what he said nor was it directed to Aldon. Aldon was special . . He did say stats are for losers though lol
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.

Still working hard to be wrong I guess.

😝
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by saj4423:
What great 49er said stats are for pussies and all those sacks that Aldon Smith got were the result of the other Smith doing his job and the dirty work.

That's not what he said nor was it directed to Aldon. Aldon was special . . He did say stats are for losers though lol

Consistent pressures equals more sacks for someone on the DL, might not be the guy that's getting consistent pressure BUT it very well could mean a sack for someone else…folks pretending that constant pressure doesn't affect every play is trying way to hard to "win" an argument.

Verse got DROY with 4.5 sacks this season (he was getting DROY before the playoffs) he was f**king up plays constantly which helped everyone else on that good young DL.

Andrew van Ginkel had the same amount of sacks as TJ Watt this yr, we calling him a better pass rusher in 2024?
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.

Still working hard to be wrong I guess.

a sack is a type of pressure pretty much tho,....lol. what's going on here?

Guys are getting over 100 pressures within a year. If 10 are sacks,.... 100-10 = 90. Don't you think 90 pressures spread throughout the year would've had more impact on game outcomes than 10 plays that resulted in sacks?

It's a causation thing anyways mostly so I dont know what the fuss is over.
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,482
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by saj4423:
What great 49er said stats are for pussies and all those sacks that Aldon Smith got were the result of the other Smith doing his job and the dirty work.

That's not what he said nor was it directed to Aldon. Aldon was special . . He did say stats are for losers though lol

Consistent pressures equals more sacks for someone on the DL, might not be the guy that's getting consistent pressure BUT it very well could mean a sack for someone else…folks pretending that constant pressure doesn't affect every play is trying way to hard to "win" an argument.

Verse got DROY with 4.5 sacks this season (he was getting DROY before the playoffs) he was f**king up plays constantly which helped everyone else on that good young DL.

Andrew van Ginkel had the same amount of sacks as TJ Watt this yr, we calling him a better pass rusher in 2024?

Talk about trying hard to "win" an argument and failing. The fact you guys keep saying "SACK for someone else" says all you need to know.

Ginkel had 49 pressures to TJ Watts 53. So is Ginkel effecting the game almost as much as TJ?

And again TJ Watt with 53 pressures easily one of the best pass rushers in the game is only averaging 3 pressures a game.

3 pressures on what 60 plays.

Yes consistent combo pressure from multiple DL could be a huge plus. Singular player pressure isn't as big as you guys are making it out to be. IMO
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.

Still working hard to be wrong I guess.

a sack is a type of pressure pretty much tho,....lol. what's going on here?

Guys are getting over 100 pressures within a year. If 10 are sacks,.... 100-10 = 90. Don't you think 90 pressures spread throughout the year would've had more impact on game outcomes than 10 plays that resulted in sacks?

It's a causation thing anyways mostly so I dont know what the fuss is over.

The "fuss" is from people not understanding that pressures have value if the player with the pressure doesn't get the sack I guess.

If ever player on a DL had a 100% pressure rate they still couldn't all get a sack, but that line would be the greatest line in history :)
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by Hoovtrain:
Originally posted by saj4423:
What great 49er said stats are for pussies and all those sacks that Aldon Smith got were the result of the other Smith doing his job and the dirty work.

That's not what he said nor was it directed to Aldon. Aldon was special . . He did say stats are for losers though lol

Consistent pressures equals more sacks for someone on the DL, might not be the guy that's getting consistent pressure BUT it very well could mean a sack for someone else…folks pretending that constant pressure doesn't affect every play is trying way to hard to "win" an argument.

Verse got DROY with 4.5 sacks this season (he was getting DROY before the playoffs) he was f**king up plays constantly which helped everyone else on that good young DL.

Andrew van Ginkel had the same amount of sacks as TJ Watt this yr, we calling him a better pass rusher in 2024?

You could even look at the guy we cut, Leonard Floyd, who had a pedestrian 9 sacks last year. But I don't remember him blowing up plays left and right. He had good sack numbers because the guy opposite of him was providing consistent pressure. Nick Bosa also had 9 sacks last year. Guess him and Floyd played equal to each other, huh?
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by Scoots:
Yeah, you are working hard to be wrong.

Is 1 sack better than 1 pressure? Yes. But is a player that gets 80 pressures and 1 sack more valuable than a player that gets 15 pressures and 5 sacks? Absolutely yes.

One outcome of a pressure is a sack by another player, that is a big part of their value. To some extent a sack is the luck that comes from pressures. Most DT sacks are the result of DE pressures, it doesn't go to the DE but the result of the play is still a sack.

Could've just stopped right there.

Still working hard to be wrong I guess.

a sack is a type of pressure pretty much tho,....lol. what's going on here?

Guys are getting over 100 pressures within a year. If 10 are sacks,.... 100-10 = 90. Don't you think 90 pressures spread throughout the year would've had more impact on game outcomes than 10 plays that resulted in sacks?

It's a causation thing anyways mostly so I dont know what the fuss is over.

The "fuss" is from people not understanding that pressures have value if the player with the pressure doesn't get the sack I guess.

If ever player on a DL had a 100% pressure rate they still couldn't all get a sack, but that line would be the greatest line in history :)

Yes....hope that one's over, cause it's not even the best play, defensively. A sack on 2nd down doesnt stop them from converting for a 1st down on the very next play,...but an INT does.

We've had 10 sack guys in football history that really didn't amount to much the rest of the time. 10 plays isint being a difference maker all year,...so hopefully the example I gave put that to bed,...cause you'd be braindead to give up dozens and dozens of pressures throughout the year for 10 plays that look good on the stat sheet.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone