Originally posted by SmokeyJoe:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
No, I understand what you're saying. The evaluation of the player is independent. Doesn't change the fact that the post sucks.
Because it's either a contradiction or not a point that's applicable across the board. How good can a post be if you can't apply the same rule to every prospect? To explain further, if a player can still be a good prospect while having a loaded roster compared to his competition, doesn't that make his point kind of irrelevant? Why does it matter if he was surrounded with lots of talent? The original topic was who's had to deal with more adversity. So because Trey played with lots of talent, that means Trey had everything handed to him?
Bad posts gets an "LOL" from me. Sorry.
You clearly don't understand what I'm saying.
Start with the assumption you're making that he didn't apply the same standard when evaluating Mac Jones. Then try to understand the basis for his preference for Jones, which has little to nothing to do with whether or not he thought either of them benefited from the talent around them. His preference for Jones also has nothing to do with the conversation.
It's a hell of a lot easier to simplify or misappropriate somebody else's argument than it is to address it substantively. Don't let me stop you from taking potshots though.
Smokey, you know damn well someone saying "the irony" is not even close to the worst example of misappropriation in this thread. I thought it was funny, that's it, you're the one trying to make this into a gotcha moment. I like some of Krizay's posts and others of his that I don't like, but he's come into the Trey thread to mock Trey often, I don't see you calling out those posts for hypocrisy, it's no secret why not. Personally, I don't have animosity towards Mac Jones like other posters do towards Trey. And yes, you can have an independent projection of a player, so even if it's technically not a hypocritical post, it was funny, and the point made was not a good one since being in a good program says virtually nothing about your personal adversity or lack there of.
It's also hilarious that you're trying to say there's a one way crusade from a select group of posters, when all you've done this offseason was lead a group of posters to believe any negative report about Trey, put limitations on Trey's future, repeatedly beat a dead horse that you don't believe in Trey's ability, and mock others who do the same for Brock or Sam.
Meanwhile I've been saying from the beginning that we don't know how Trey will perform given adequate playing time, I've repeatedly stated I don't thinks it's fair to assume Trey would outperform Jimmy, or that he has a higher ceiling than Purdy, I said it's perfectly reasonable to not believe in Trey and to criticize him for missing throws vs Chicago, and I've repeatedly said that I believe in Brock, so much so that it wouldn't bother me at all if Brock played every snap from here on out. I would be thrilled in fact because that means he's healthy and playing well.
Unlike you, I don't make definitive claims a young QB with 3 starts, I don't have over half of my posts in a thread of a player I don't believe in (which might be a record btw), and yet you're the one accusing others of having an agenda.
So sure, Krizay's post isn't technically hypocritical, but even mentioning a one way crusade and lumping me in there… is 100% hypocritical.