Originally posted by Waterbear:
No, I understand what you're saying. The evaluation of the player is independent. Doesn't change the fact that the post sucks.
Because it's either a contradiction or not a point that's applicable across the board. How good can a post be if you can't apply the same rule to every prospect? To explain further, if a player can still be a good prospect while having a loaded roster compared to his competition, doesn't that make his point kind of irrelevant? Why does it matter if he was surrounded with lots of talent? The original topic was who's had to deal with more adversity. So because Trey played with lots of talent, that means Trey had everything handed to him?
Bad posts gets an "LOL" from me. Sorry.
You clearly don't understand what I'm saying.
Start with the assumption you're making that he didn't apply the same standard when evaluating Mac Jones. Then try to understand the basis for his preference for Jones, which has little to nothing to do with whether or not he thought either of them benefited from the talent around them. His preference for Jones also has nothing to do with the conversation.
It's a hell of a lot easier to simplify or misappropriate somebody else's argument than it is to address it substantively. Don't let me stop you from taking potshots though.
[ Edited by SmokeyJoe on May 16, 2023 at 4:00 PM ]

