Los Angeles Chargers QB Trey Lance Thread

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

he's asking for the source of your opinion.

Originally posted by Kolohe:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

he's asking for the source of your opinion.

A foreign concept for those who form their opinions by pulling them out of their asses.

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to do so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
A foreign concept for those who form their opinions by pulling them out of their asses.

let me help you out kid

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Trey was 100% with a broken finger I guess.

Or the fact that the 49ers were trying to trade Jimmy but he had no suitors. There was a rumor Washington wanted to trade for him but Rivera said the report was BS. Who knows what's true.

Again, I'm all for believing in what you want about individual players. But when you exclude details like that it reeks of a bad faith argument.

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
A foreign concept for those who form their opinions by pulling them out of their asses.

let me help you out kid

Again, what's the problem with asking someone to explain their reasoning or their sources that they're basing their opinion off of? Please help this "kid" understand that. Share some of the wisdom you've acquired from being raised on a steady diet of leaded gasoline and paint chips.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Trey was 100% with a broken finger I guess.

Or the fact that the 49ers were trying to trade Jimmy but he had no suitors. There was a rumor Washington wanted to trade for him but Rivera said the report was BS. Who knows what's true.

Again, I'm all for believing in what you want about individual players. But when you exclude details like that it reeks of a bad faith argument.

Trying to get rid of Jimmy does not mean Lance was ready. It just means what we knew before they ever drafted Trey, they weren't going to pay Jimmy

Where is the bad faith? Lmao

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by boast:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:
A foreign concept for those who form their opinions by pulling them out of their asses.

let me help you out kid

Again, what's the problem with asking someone to explain their reasoning or their sources that they're basing their opinion off of? Please help this "kid" understand that. Share some of the wisdom you've acquired from being raised on a steady diet of leaded gasoline and paint chips.

awww look at you!!! you got mad. lololol. youre a child.

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Trey was 100% with a broken finger I guess.

Or the fact that the 49ers were trying to trade Jimmy but he had no suitors. There was a rumor Washington wanted to trade for him but Rivera said the report was BS. Who knows what's true.

Again, I'm all for believing in what you want about individual players. But when you exclude details like that it reeks of a bad faith argument.

Trying to get rid of Jimmy does not mean Lance was ready. It just means what we knew before they ever drafted Trey, they weren't going to pay Jimmy

Where is the bad faith? Lmao

I never said they knew Lance was ready.

You're the one saying they brought back Jimmy BECAUSE Lance wasn't ready. Calling it a "red flag" that they brought him back.

You're the one making the claim about Jimmy being rushed back when he wasn't fully healthy, but conveniently you excluded the fact that Trey had a broken finger his rookie season.

It's 100% in bad faith to mention injuries for Jimmy but not Trey's.

This offseason is going to be just as unbearable as the last three

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Trey was 100% with a broken finger I guess.

Or the fact that the 49ers were trying to trade Jimmy but he had no suitors. There was a rumor Washington wanted to trade for him but Rivera said the report was BS. Who knows what's true.

Again, I'm all for believing in what you want about individual players. But when you exclude details like that it reeks of a bad faith argument.

Trying to get rid of Jimmy does not mean Lance was ready. It just means what we knew before they ever drafted Trey, they weren't going to pay Jimmy

Where is the bad faith? Lmao

I never said they knew Lance was ready.

You're the one saying they brought back Jimmy BECAUSE Lance wasn't ready. Calling it a "red flag" that they brought him back.

You're the one making the claim about Jimmy being rushed back when he wasn't fully healthy, but conveniently you excluded the fact that Trey had a broken finger his rookie season.

It's 100% in bad faith to mention injuries for Jimmy but not Trey's.

If you wanted to move on from a player and you spent 3 first round picks on a player to do so, would you not want to let him play if you were confident in him?

Wouldn't you give the guy you want to move on from the chance to heal up? Rushing Jimmy back there was a red flag to me, there's no bad faith involved man

Originally posted by tankle104:

Originally posted by eric_anthony:

Originally posted by Cisco0623:
I agree, but the thing is we don't know much about either guy really. For me it makes sense Brock is "better" than Lance at this point given his experience in college compared to Trey. That being said Brock was amazing in his few starts. Way above anyone's expectations.

My fear is we go with Brock and he's good, but not as good as being projected and hyped right now. Because of that we never develop Lance who technically has the higher ceiling so it will be the ole "what if" that haunts fans.

Also I would imagine Lance will have a slow start, but the idea for me is take that step back and say is he improving week to week etc. I feel like Kyle may never give him that chance.

Because the team and organization is so impatient and desperate to find a FQB. They're just settling for someone who looks good but not great. They can win lots of games but they're never gonna win the big game cause they don't have an elite QB. You can have the number 1 defense but that's not enough for todays NFL. If Brock improves that would be great I just hope that what we saw wasn't his ceiling.

Lmao what are you guys talking about!? If brock plays at the same level as last season, that is elite? His stats in nearly every single way were elite and with the best in the league? The offense was literally top of the league in nearly every major category while he was starting.

There isn't much more you can ask for, especially in a balanced offense like ours.

there are things he can definitely improve on but acting like he was just "good"? My goodness, what did you rate lances few games? Tough critics. Lol

I never knocked Brock, only praised him. In the end we really don't know yet since both have played so little.

I do want to see Lance though so there's my bias. I would be fine giving the kid 4-6 game audition assuming it will only make sure Brock is solid 100% as well, but some fans will say I am crazy.

Originally posted by Fanaticofnfl:
This offseason is going to be just as unbearable as the last three

Lol it's been this way since 2005.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by lamontb:

He's splitting first team reps with Darnold? Yikes

No. He said he expect both guys to get some first string reps…he didn't say they would be splitting them.

That is, by definition, splitting reps.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:

Originally posted by 49ersRing:

Originally posted by CharlieSheen:
Idk why there's so much shock. I've been saying the whole time he has not impressed them. You have to start being mad at Trey for not being handed the opportunity and not Kyle

Could you show us the quote you're getting that from, because it's surely not from anything that's already been posted.

Getting what?

I'm just asking where you're getting that they're not impressed with Trey based on the quotes from KS and Lynch that we've seen, the most recent information that we have.

You don't need a quote. If you look at the situation it's made sense for awhile.

They wanted to move on from Jimmy, and while he was injured the guy they spent 3 firsts on to so had his best game against the Texans. The perfect time to make the transition with the fan base behind it. Instead they rush Jimmy back before he's 100% and bench Trey. That was a red flag.

Bringing Jimmy back with incentives was a red flag and so was the Darnold signing. You just had to accept it.

The play calling is another red flag. Everybody just says have him run the Jimmy/Purdy offense, but the reason he's not allowed is lack of confidence. I've seen this coming from miles away. The practice reports, the tape, it all lines up. He hasn't been what they thought he would be.

Trey was 100% with a broken finger I guess.

Or the fact that the 49ers were trying to trade Jimmy but he had no suitors. There was a rumor Washington wanted to trade for him but Rivera said the report was BS. Who knows what's true.

Again, I'm all for believing in what you want about individual players. But when you exclude details like that it reeks of a bad faith argument.

Trying to get rid of Jimmy does not mean Lance was ready. It just means what we knew before they ever drafted Trey, they weren't going to pay Jimmy

Where is the bad faith? Lmao

I never said they knew Lance was ready.

You're the one saying they brought back Jimmy BECAUSE Lance wasn't ready. Calling it a "red flag" that they brought him back.

You're the one making the claim about Jimmy being rushed back when he wasn't fully healthy, but conveniently you excluded the fact that Trey had a broken finger his rookie season.

It's 100% in bad faith to mention injuries for Jimmy but not Trey's.

But, we got each other, we can keep each other company.