Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by libertyforever:
That wasn't the argument. No one is disputing that higher draft has higher success rate.
The argument is how relevant that is compare to player performance. Draft pick position is one data point, performance on the field is another data point. Sure the more snaps the more important the performance data point. As some point, the draft position data point becomes completely irrelevant. Purdy might play 7 to 10 games this season. How impressive does he need to have a fair competition for the 2023 starter job. Or are going to say he had a very impressive 7-10 games, but he is only a 7th rounder, so he is not gonna make it.
Not sure why this is having to be said.
Literally what he just wrote backed up that higher picks have a higher success rate…which in fact is about performance on the field. Overall there isn't a position that holds true more than the QB position.
You probably won't get it. But here is a joke that applied to what was discussed.
A statistician was travelling in an airplane.
About an hour into the flight, the pilot announced that they had lost an engine, but don't worry, they plane still has one engine left.
The statistician tried to calm everyone down "It is fine. Statistically, only one crash for approximately every 1.2 million flight."
A little later, the pilot announced that the last engine failed.
The passenger next the the statistican asked: "We should be ok, right? Only one crash for approximately every 1.2 million flight."
The statistician responded: "Yes only one crash for approximately every 1.2 million flight, but there is a good indication that we are among the one out of 1.2 million flight that will crash."

