Originally posted by ritz126:
Originally posted by random49er:
Easiest thing in the world to do is make arguments on someone's ability when they are injured and can't prove otherwise.
Accomplishes absolutely nothing, however.
im going based on play if you are comparing to an injured Jimmy G which is what we had at the end of last season then yes you have an arguement but not compared against a healthy jimmy G
It's been repeated ad nauseum that we just dont have the evidence to say one way or another. IMO, he'd be set up by now to have a much better 2nd half of the season than Jimmy G, but that's just a guess on my part, because he hasn't played enough.
The 1st game was a rain storm and he was injured early in the 2nd while the offense was having success. So we just don't know. Jimmy can play like complete crap ala the KC game in a couple weeks and you can still say Jimmy's the better choice because the guy hasn't played, lol.
No substance at all there and just a waste of a topic. If he's your choice, that's fine.