Mike McGlinchey-OT-Denver Broncos | Page 259

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

This. Like....Bill O'Brian wouldn't even do this.

Jan 19, 2021 at 7:53 PM

#3876

9moon
Veteran
Posts: 21,950

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

I see you NEW at this... the purpose of those combo is to get Houston to counter and see what they want..

it's not a good idea to just offer them the RANCH right away and give them the advantage on upping the bill or asking for more..

It's ok buddy, you just keep taking notes, ok??

Jan 19, 2021 at 8:00 PM

#3877

Hysterikal
Veteran
Posts: 39,234

Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

I see you NEW at this... the purpose of those combo is to get Houston to counter and see what they want..

it's not a good idea to just offer them the RANCH right away and give them the advantage on upping the bill or asking for more..

It's ok buddy, you just keep taking notes, ok??

Oh see I thought that was your offer. Alright I'll play the part of the Texans. "Bahahahahahahahaha f**k no". Here's our counter you're 1st round picks for the next 3 years. Fred Warner. Your 3rd round pick this year and next year. Your 2nd round pick next year. Raheem Mostert and keep Jimmy G cause we are don't want the cap hit.

Jan 19, 2021 at 9:25 PM

#3878

9moon
Veteran
Posts: 21,950

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9moon:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

I see you NEW at this... the purpose of those combo is to get Houston to counter and see what they want..

it's not a good idea to just offer them the RANCH right away and give them the advantage on upping the bill or asking for more..

It's ok buddy, you just keep taking notes, ok??

Oh see I thought that was your offer. Alright I'll play the part of the Texans. "Bahahahahahahahaha f**k no". Here's our counter you're 1st round picks for the next 3 years. Fred Warner. Your 3rd round pick this year and next year. Your 2nd round pick next year. Raheem Mostert and keep Jimmy G cause we are don't want the cap hit.

You're basically telling me you got no plans on trading Watson.. and you rather pay Watson the 100 million you signed him for when you know he wont play hard for you?

Look around the league and come back to me with the best offer on the table and give me 3 minutes to decide if I can afford to match it..

but i'll tell you now, you're not getting three 1st from anyone... but I'm willing to throw in Deevah with my initial offer.

AA
Grappy
Glynch
2nd & 4th in 2022
Deevah

Jan 19, 2021 at 10:48 PM

#3879

LVJay
Veteran
Posts: 27,847

Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

Yes bruh, absolutely yes. All of Texas will love it

Now, will you be able to sleep good tonight? Good night, buddy

Jan 20, 2021 at 5:52 AM

#3880

Hysterikal
Veteran
Posts: 39,234

Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

I see you NEW at this... the purpose of those combo is to get Houston to counter and see what they want..

it's not a good idea to just offer them the RANCH right away and give them the advantage on upping the bill or asking for more..

It's ok buddy, you just keep taking notes, ok??

Oh see I thought that was your offer. Alright I'll play the part of the Texans. "Bahahahahahahahaha f**k no". Here's our counter you're 1st round picks for the next 3 years. Fred Warner. Your 3rd round pick this year and next year. Your 2nd round pick next year. Raheem Mostert and keep Jimmy G cause we are don't want the cap hit.

You're basically telling me you got no plans on trading Watson.. and you rather pay Watson the 100 million you signed him for when you know he wont play hard for you?

Look around the league and come back to me with the best offer on the table and give me 3 minutes to decide if I can afford to match it..

but i'll tell you now, you're not getting three 1st from anyone... but I'm willing to throw in Deevah with my initial offer.

AA
Grappy
Glynch
2nd & 4th in 2022
Deevah

Houston will accept the Trade with the Jets. Maybe if you offered a good deal they would have accepted

Jan 20, 2021 at 7:38 AM

#3881

illinois9er
Veteran
Posts: 6,160

Originally posted by 9moon:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by 9moon:
Glynch - AA - Grappy and next year's 2nd and 4th for Watson ??

If you're the Texans would you take this trade? Do you think the rest of the NFL doesn't watch film on players?

I see you NEW at this... the purpose of those combo is to get Houston to counter and see what they want..

it's not a good idea to just offer them the RANCH right away and give them the advantage on upping the bill or asking for more..

It's ok buddy, you just keep taking notes, ok??

No the purpose of your trade proposal is to piss them off because it's the most ludicrous proposal in eternity. All you're doing there is essentially never getting Watson because McNair would sever communication wth Lynch for that terrible trade.

Jan 20, 2021 at 7:54 AM

#3882

Hysterikal
Veteran
Posts: 39,234

Originally posted by illinois9er:
No the purpose of your trade proposal is to piss them off because it's the most ludicrous proposal in eternity. All you're doing there is essentially never getting Watson because McNair would sever communication wth Lynch for that terrible trade.

Come on a 25 year old franchise QB for a 2nd and a 4th round pick and some trash and let us use you as a salary cap dump even though your team has no cap room. Kk thanks bye

Jan 20, 2021 at 8:38 AM

#3883

illinois9er
Veteran
Posts: 6,160

Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
No the purpose of your trade proposal is to piss them off because it's the most ludicrous proposal in eternity. All you're doing there is essentially never getting Watson because McNair would sever communication wth Lynch for that terrible trade.

Come on a 25 year old franchise QB for a 2nd and a 4th round pick and some trash and let us use you as a salary cap dump even though your team has no cap room. Kk thanks bye

You're right, the more I think about it the better it is for both teams. The trade is fair and valid, motion passed.

Jan 20, 2021 at 8:43 AM

#3884

GEEK
Veteran
Posts: 19,407

Originally posted by illinois9er:
Originally posted by Hysterikal:
Originally posted by illinois9er:
No the purpose of your trade proposal is to piss them off because it's the most ludicrous proposal in eternity. All you're doing there is essentially never getting Watson because McNair would sever communication wth Lynch for that terrible trade.

Come on a 25 year old franchise QB for a 2nd and a 4th round pick and some trash and let us use you as a salary cap dump even though your team has no cap room. Kk thanks bye

You're right, the more I think about it the better it is for both teams. The trade is fair and valid, motion passed.

But it works in Madden, so it must be realistic.

Jan 20, 2021 at 11:22 PM

#3885

9moon
Veteran
Posts: 21,950

Yah'll need to get your heads checked if you feel that we should offer them the MAX out right... why would you do such thing?