Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 879 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Jimmy hater...Jimmy lover...Jimmy hater....Jimmy stans

this thread

It annoys me when I have to use those terms as well. I only try to use it in the context of groups of people. I think calling one singular poster one of those labels is a waster of time and doesn't add to any football argument you can possibly make. Hence why Furlow uses it in all of his posts.

Both sides are guilty of it. That's all I'm going to say on the matter lol

Absolutely. And I can't wait until I get called a Trey hater one day.

If you go around acting like Captain Save-a-Hoe for the Trey haters the way you do the Jimmy haters, yes we'll call you a Trey hater as well.

A nameless faceless person on a football forum is threatening to put me into his imaginary group he created, probably in his pajamas, to appeal his fictional following. How will I ever sleep at night.

You think I created the "Jimmy hater" group? Lol GTFO with that nonsense. There have been illogical haters of certain players long before Jimmy. Same simpleton mindsets gravitate to it. And I don't give a s**t how you sleep, but if you come in here protecting people whose sole purpose is to denigrate a player that played well but simply came up short of being great, then yes, you'll be considered a part of that group. Perhaps try practicing actual unbiasedness and call out the haters when they're spewing venom for no reason.
Lol what exactly or your end game in all these threads? Is this going to continue throughout the season?
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Lol what's up Ribs

He can't quit you
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.

I give you credit, you saw him being a back up long before I did. I didn't expect him to fall that low. Good Job
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.

I give you credit, you saw him being a back up long before I did. I didn't expect him to fall that low. Good Job

If he was healthy he would have been a starter somewhere. After surgery with his 25 million, 1 year contract, while injured really changed his standing. Barring another injury he will get his shot next season, if not sooner. Ribs always thought that even keeping him here despite his crap contract that a team might get desperate before the deadline so there's still a chance someone gets injured and he gets traded for a decent (not tremendous) haul or the worst case scenario he's playing here. I don't wanna talk about that though. There's still a good shot Jimmy starts somewhere this year. I wouldn't put money on it but the chance is good

Keeping Jimmy even as a backup was always an option. If someone gets hurt, teams would be more willing to splurge a little if the were in the hunt. Now with his current contract he's plenty tradable outside of his no trade clause but I think he'd rather be here than some s**t Seahawks team.
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.

I give you credit, you saw him being a back up long before I did. I didn't expect him to fall that low. Good Job
I had a lot scenarios, one would be backing up Brady again. Hard to be a starter with a late start
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.

I give you credit, you saw him being a back up long before I did. I didn't expect him to fall that low. Good Job

If he was healthy he would have been a starter somewhere. After surgery with his 25 million, 1 year contract, while injured really changed his standing. Barring another injury he will get his shot next season, if not sooner. Ribs always thought that even keeping him here despite his crap contract that a team might get desperate before the deadline so there's still a chance someone gets injured and he gets traded for a decent (not tremendous) haul or the worst case scenario he's playing here. I don't wanna talk about that though. There's still a good shot Jimmy starts somewhere this year. I wouldn't put money on it but the chance is good

Keeping Jimmy even as a backup was always an option. If someone gets hurt, teams would be more willing to splurge a little if the were in the hunt. Now with his current contract he's plenty tradable outside of his no trade clause but I think he'd rather be here than some s**t Seahawks team.

100% agree he will be a starter before season ends for another team. I was hoping for Seattle but hopefully at least someone we play this year.
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by Strwy2Hevn:
Originally posted by TheGore49er:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by BangBang49er:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by YACBros85:
Originally posted by TD49ers:
Originally posted by the_dynasty:
I said it before and I'll say it again. The injury reason gave a convenient out to save face to both the FO and Jimmy.

If the injury was the reason for not trading him and considering other teams actually wanted him, why wouldn't they pick him right now? Why would teams not upgrade at a starting qb position if they actually want Jimmy as a starter?

Why would Jimmy prefer the bench to any starting jobs?

It's really simple and you can apply Occam's razor here. Teams simply don't think he's that good. Teams view him as a fringe starter/backup caliber QB.
If they viewed him as an upgrade as their starter, Jimmy would already be on another team. A qb who is actually coveted by teams doesn't settle for being a backup and teams actually try to get him.

It's really not rocket science here. Teams and players act in their own self-interest. If teams see a way to upgrade their roster, they pick up players to do so. If a qb sees an opportunity to be a starter, he takes that chance. There wasn't a chance. Jimmy settled for a backup job.

Yep and ask yourself why would Jimmy want a no trade clause...

If he were the QB that many seem to think, team should be lining up, especially after the new contract.

Teams were given permission to negotiate a new contract with Jimmy for a month before he signed his new contract. Teams could have drawn up their own just like it.

But they didnt.

So again NFL teams currently do not see JG as a viable mid to long term starting QB and Jimmy clearly knows this. Why be a back up somewhere else when he can stay here on a good team.

This is very disingenuous. Every single team already made moves and already had their starters outside of possibly Seattle. Jimmy wasn't going anywhere to be a starter so late in the offseason. Again, outside of possibly Seattle no matter where he signed it was going to be as a backup as pretty much every single team already had their competition going or starters already named. At the end of the day, this was the best scenario for both teams as he got a decent paycheck with great incentives and the 49ers upgraded from Sudfeld.

I call BS.

A top QB in the NFL is the panacea for success in this generation of the NFL. JG just signed a huge bargain of a deal and not one NFL team was willing to sign him.....other than us.

Dont give me the crap about teams preparing.

What teams needed a starting QB in August that already didn't make a move?

Most. 20 teams currently in the NFL will never reach any form of consistent success with their current QB situation. If Jimmy is all that and more, like some are suggesting, teams should be lining up out the door. Unfortunately for JG, there was only one standing at the door.

Some teams will be next season if he's not injured. Many talking heads reported on interest pre injury. Now guys like Schefter, who said there was interest, aren't always right but they do have more information than you guys who have a very very clear and obvious bias. Nobody wants to take on a guy that has a 25 million dollar contract, that is injured, with only a single year left in a contract. Now add in giving up draft capital for that? Far less than ideal. There's only a select few guys worth taking that risk. By the time Jimmy was cleared to play everyone that needed a QB besides Seattle already had their position set.

Again multiple "experts" said there was interest in Jimmy before he had surgery. Now tell me, where is your evidence there was none pre-injury? Again, you guys are being very disingenuous glossing over his injury to make it seem like without the injury nobody would want him. To sit and act like getting surgery right at the time he did had no impact on his vakue is just being intentionally ignorant.

Excellent post. And the bolded is what the Jimmy detractors (is that better for you guys to not get emotional about?) continue to ignore. They present the most simpleton argument of "well no one traded for him so they just don't think he's good enough." Child-like mindset.

The child-like mindset is deliberately misrepresenting what one's arguing opponents are saying. It's not JUST what is bolded. It's that his ability does not MATCH that contract. No, he is not a bad QB. He's one of the better ones. But the GULF between the elite QBs is and the "pretty good" ones is so vast that the Jimmy's and Winston's of the league should be making under 20 million.

So, here's a he HONEST and actual reasons no one wanted him:

1. He was injured, and his healing time table would put him behind the ball for training camp.

2. His contract was unreasonably high for what he is: a "win-now" bridge QB who you sign so you remain competitive while your QB of the Future develops. Moreover, the salary of elite QBs is inflating so much that the tier two guys can no longer be paid like they used to by wise team developers, relative to the elite QBs. Not if a team wants to win. Because the "pretty good" QBs need great players around them to succeed consistently.

3. He has a history of injuries.

4. The 49ers have Lance, who they have invested a bunch of resources in, which dramatically reduced their leverage in trade talks. "Why should I give you draft capital for a guy you've clearly moved on from?"

5. Due to his injury, he was left out while the QB market settled and teams got their guy. The NFL is usually risk averse and focused in the RIGHT NOW. They are rolling with the QB who was best available when they NEEDED him, not three months later.

6. (Only mentioned here because a Bucs person said this to the media) His game is almost exclusively the middle of the field, which makes it easier for great defenses to shut him down. That means he'll struggle in the playoffs—which he has (check his playoff stats). That means Jimmy will never be the guy a team chooses as the END of their QB search. Which means he's strictly a "win-now" bridge QB. And no one wants to pay 25 million for a bridge QB.
I think this is a good post but most people were not saying this nor ever insinuated this besides you. You've always been pretty fair though I do think you've gotten ahead of yourself, as others have as well, just to deny Jimmys success at times in your case or in others to prop him up.

To waterbear's point.. For month that Ribs guy continually, daily, pointed out that Jimmy returning was a possibility strictly based off of what the coaches and FO were saying and posters like you and captain countdown argued that the coaches didn't really mean that and that it was coach speak. Now you same guys are denying that was ever part of the conversation. I understand that there were many different angles from different posters but Ribs specifically was saying that while chances were small, the coaches were always willing to bring Jimmy back if the scenario fit. You guys flat out denied that they were being serious and were saying they were just lying. Ribs was right the entire time. You guys were wrong. Own it I say, you and others.

Lol what's up Ribs

Wonder if he thinks its a win to get demoted also?

Ribs always thought he was going to go somewhere to compete for a job pre injury, including possibly here to compete with Lance(albeit unlikely)for the one year left and try to earn a contract else. Once Lance took the bull by the horns during the offseason workouts he changed his opinion on the competition but still never wavered on schooling guys on the possibility of Jimmy still returning. Quoting direct quotes from coaches while others literally said they were lying creating crazy conspiracies.

Jimmy being a backup is of little surprise. Especially after he got surgery and his contract became untradable. Pre surgery he's probably a starter somewhere which he'll probably be next year. For us it's a win win. As Ribs pointed out and also schooled guys, hes a perfect backup. Unlike some he likes what is best for the team and doesn't get triggered by another man's presence. It was always about what's best for the team with him not some weird vendetta towards another man.

Jimmy getting demoted is a huge win for the team. I know some put their distaste towards Jimmy over the team and would rather fail but not him.

I give you credit, you saw him being a back up long before I did. I didn't expect him to fall that low. Good Job
I had a lot scenarios, one would be backing up Brady again. Hard to be a starter with a late start

That's awesome, I thought he was better than a back up role. But here we are.
Kyle is spending a lot for security here. I guess we need 2 QB's to run this scheme. LOL
Originally posted by NCommand:
Kyle is spending a lot for security here. I guess we need 2 QB's to run this scheme. LOL
Eats up QBs and coaching staff
I still think he will be gone by the trade deadline, his salary is now much easier to move, and we just need a QB injury to spur the trade.
Originally posted by TheXFactor:
I still think he will be gone by the trade deadline, his salary is now much easier to move, and we just need a QB injury to spur the trade.
Depends on Purdy progression and finding another Mobile PS QB
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by NCommand:
Kyle is spending a lot for security here. I guess we need 2 QB's to run this scheme. LOL
Eats up QBs and coaching staff

Haha...love the "coaching staff" to this!
Originally posted by 5_Golden_Rings:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by eric_anthony:
Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Jimmy is way better than a top 20 qb. He is a 8-16 qb. This has been discussed over and over. Once you take out politics and PR, that's what the numbers say.

Then he would've gotten numerous trade offers despite his injury.

TThere were no offers because Kyle and John never wanted to trade him. From the get-go. Resigning at the last minute to provide salary cap space was the plan from early March until now. It's all it's all about keeping Trey's ego intact while he goes through another "learning year " Jimmy gets this and Figures it's a good way to end his time here while ramping into the starters role after surgery.
you know that all of that is fiction ..

Maybe. But you know what else is fiction? Jimmy's a crappy quarterback that's cost us for Super Bowls. That's fiction too. But that doesn't stop posters from writing 3,000 pages of garbage to protect Kyle's reputation for being Mr offensive genius. I like my Fiction more

... and Jimmy will be starting by week 4 ....
Fairytales

They do come true though...

There is no possible way Jimmy starts week 4 unless Trey gets injured. Absolutely none. Even if Trey sucks really badly. AT BEST it would be mid-season, and even then only a fifty-fifty shot at best.

The starter will be determined by Kyle based on who gives us the best chance to win that week's game. Pretty effin simple. It will be evaluated every week. If trey executes the way kyle likes, he will start the whole season. If he plays like a 22 year old who's been in three games in two years, I don't guess he will be starting past october. This is about winning games. It is not about giving trey touch time. This has been crystal clear since last season. No change now.

I think he could make into week 3. But once the tape starts rolling, it's going to be really tough to keep trey in games. My 2c.

Although, there is a wild card.

Our IOL could be so godawful that it's really not going to matter who is behind center. In which case yeah, give trey more time since we'll be giving up 4 sacks a game and constantly nicking up our QB's. So there's that.
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Originally posted by Waterbear:
Originally posted by Bay2Bay9erAllday:
Jimmy hater...Jimmy lover...Jimmy hater....Jimmy stans

this thread

It annoys me when I have to use those terms as well. I only try to use it in the context of groups of people. I think calling one singular poster one of those labels is a waster of time and doesn't add to any football argument you can possibly make. Hence why Furlow uses it in all of his posts.

Both sides are guilty of it. That's all I'm going to say on the matter lol

Absolutely. And I can't wait until I get called a Trey hater one day.

If you go around acting like Captain Save-a-Hoe for the Trey haters the way you do the Jimmy haters, yes we'll call you a Trey hater as well.

A nameless faceless person on a football forum is threatening to put me into his imaginary group he created, probably in his pajamas, to appeal his fictional following. How will I ever sleep at night.

You think I created the "Jimmy hater" group? Lol GTFO with that nonsense. There have been illogical haters of certain players long before Jimmy. Same simpleton mindsets gravitate to it. And I don't give a s**t how you sleep, but if you come in here protecting people whose sole purpose is to denigrate a player that played well but simply came up short of being great, then yes, you'll be considered a part of that group. Perhaps try practicing actual unbiasedness and call out the haters when they're spewing venom for no reason.

Gentlemen, please read Rule #1.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone