Roger Craig's long wait ends as 49ers legend finally takes his place in Canton →

There are 397 users in the forums

Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Shop 49ers game tickets
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:11 PM
Originally posted by ltrain:

sounds like the Watson domino is falling (again) tomorrow.

Should be the whole season but I'm guessing 8 games
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:17 PM
Originally posted by lamontb:
Originally posted by ltrain:

sounds like the Watson domino is falling (again) tomorrow.

Should be the whole season but I'm guessing 8 games

Then the NFLPA will get that reduced to 4-6
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:18 PM
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,502
Originally posted by lamontb:
Should be the whole season but I'm guessing 8 games

This
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:19 PM
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,502
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Then the NFLPA will get that reduced to 4-6

No way! with a neutral 3rd party handing out the punishment I don't see anyway it gets reduced.
[ Edited by krizay on Jul 31, 2022 at 3:19 PM ]
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:34 PM
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 65,216
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by 49ers808:
Then the NFLPA will get that reduced to 4-6

No way! with a neutral 3rd party handing out the punishment I don't see anyway it gets reduced.

Goddell has final say and he will demand a year.
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:36 PM
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,502
Originally posted by mayo49:
Goddell has final say and he will demand a year.

If the judge chick says 8. No way Goodell says a year. But because he has final say I don't see him reducing any punishments handed out from the 3rd party
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:41 PM
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 65,216
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by mayo49:
Goddell has final say and he will demand a year.

If the judge chick says 8. No way Goodell says a year. But because he has final say I don't see him reducing any punishments handed out from the 3rd party

It doesn't matter what the chick hands down. Goddell will appeal it and go for a year. Otherwise, they look like they're going soft on him.
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:43 PM
  • krizay
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 26,502
Originally posted by mayo49:
It doesn't matter what the chick hands down. Goddell will appeal it and go for a year. Otherwise, they look like they're going soft on him.

I don't see that happening. If he over rules her then it's pointless to even have a neutral party. It will be a really really bad look on Goodell if overturns her and add more games.
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:45 PM
  • mayo49
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 65,216
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by mayo49:
It doesn't matter what the chick hands down. Goddell will appeal it and go for a year. Otherwise, they look like they're going soft on him.

I don't see that happening. If he over rules her then it's pointless to even have a neutral party. It will be a really really bad look on Goodell if overturns her and add more games.

No it wouldn't be a bad look. Goddell and the league have said all along, they were pushing for a year. Nothing has changed - Goddell was always going to appeal, if she ruled for anything less than the year the league has been demanding.
[ Edited by mayo49 on Jul 31, 2022 at 5:08 PM ]
Jul 31, 2022 at 3:51 PM
Originally posted by krizay:
Originally posted by mayo49:
It doesn't matter what the chick hands down. Goddell will appeal it and go for a year. Otherwise, they look like they're going soft on him.

I don't see that happening. If he over rules her then it's pointless to even have a neutral party. It will be a really really bad look on Goodell if overturns her and add more games.

It's not pointless, it's part of the show. If she rules the way he wants, then he's off the hook. If not, he steps in. 50/50 chance for him. And since when has Goodell EVER cared about a "really bad look"? If he did, he would have done a lot more to address the vast number of very questionable calls the last several years.
Jul 31, 2022 at 4:57 PM
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by SteveWallacesHelmet:
Originally posted by Furlow:
Originally posted by 49erminion:
We don't need the bad mojo that would come with trading JG to a team who lost their starter during preseason. Let's give him away for free now.

Amazing that multiple posters think this way and are actually serious lol.

It's also amazing that people are holding their breath for a type of trade that has happened once in most of our lifetimes.

So you think we should cut him right now? For what strategic purpose? There is simply no good argument for cutting him right now. That's a worse take than trying to get this thread moved to NFL Talk. How triggered can the haters be by Jimmy? Good lord.

I never said we should cut him now, because to your point, there isn't a strategic purpose. I just think it's comical people are saying the reason we should keep him is for a situation thst simply doesnt happen.

But thanks for putting words in my mouth and labeling me a hater, as usual.
Jul 31, 2022 at 5:16 PM
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,723
"Jimmy has to be traded" crowd in shambles
Jul 31, 2022 at 5:32 PM
Originally posted by okdkid:
"Jimmy has to be traded" crowd in shambles

Ford went first but Jimmy's departure is inevitable.
Jul 31, 2022 at 5:34 PM
Originally posted by random49er:
Originally posted by okdkid:
"Jimmy has to be traded" crowd in shambles

Ford went first but Jimmy's departure is inevitable.

Yeah who was that one dude that rolled in here like he was Paraag daddy 😂
Jul 31, 2022 at 5:35 PM
Originally posted by okdkid:
"Jimmy has to be traded" crowd in shambles

People thought that was the holdup? lol
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone