Jimmy Garoppolo, QB, Los Angeles Rams

Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Wanting Jimmy G over Stafford is how to know someone has a very bad drug problem

Hey I have a drug problem but I never said that…

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by random49er:
Why does the conversation have to be forced towards who people are "fans" of instead of the facts and reality of things on the football field, regardless someone's favorite team or players?

When will you tire of this fall back?

He's just trying to change the narrative/discussion. Yeah whatever with what I said....you guys like the Rams because you didn't say Stafford sucks lol.

.

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by Dsoto87:
Nah bro. Jimmy is a winner. Who would want that career loser Stafford? 🤦🏽🤣

Haha,...let's celebrate this past year and a half of hot takes galore....

.

.

.

.

Originally posted by TreyDeyEeyDey:
Crazy thing is. Without that 66 yard FG in 3 games Goff almost did what Stafford could never do. Beat a team at .500 or above. Loser Stafford was like 7 out of 68 or something. One of the worst stats in sports history. Straight garbage.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Jimmy is still here and I have always said the draft was the way to upgrade while you guys were clamoring for Stafford.
Stafford is old, a loser and on the Average tier with Jimmy and Kirk. It would be a terrible move for the 49ers to laterally upgrade to a qb on the same tier who is a loser and older.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
LOL, Stafford is a loser even when the Lions were good he lost.

The Stafford Club is delusional.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
The Lions did ditch Stafford.

Originally posted by NCommand:
Jimmy >>>>>>>>> Stafford.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
This is ideal, not a desperation move to an old loser QB like Stafford

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

The bet was Who Will Have a Higher Win% in 2021, Jimmy or Stafford.

I'll take Jimmy.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Sure it is, definitely as much or more of an valuatiom than given by the person I replied to.
I evaluated his ability, mediocre.
His status as a winner or loser, loser.
His age, old.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Getting a Stafford or Cousins would be a mistake, they are not much better than JG if at all.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford is meh and old...

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Stafford or Kirk would be disaster moves.

How can you not love our resident experts?

For faithful....

And this doesn't include a couple other posters. Including you, faithful. You've 100% said you rather have Jimmy.

First off 90% of these are from Woo. Second, I don't see anything saying JG is better than Stafford here except NCommand and I have no clue the context on that one. As to saying I'd rather have JG understand it's a notion of how much better is Stafford and does it justify the opportunity cost which we ultimately spent on Trey.

I mean the real question is would you rather have Trey or Stafford? Do you know how many Trey will win? This whole Matty S convo will look really dumb if Trey lights it up and is a Franchise Super Bowl winning QB. I mean I'd much rather have a franchise QB in his early 20s than one who is 34.

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Wanting Jimmy G over Stafford is how to know someone has a very bad drug problem

Hey I have a drug problem but I never said that…

Maybe you have a good drug problem

Originally posted by NYniner85:
So if his good not great what the hell is Jimmy lol?

Stafford had 4,900 yards 41 TD to 17 INTs completing 67% of his passes. They avg less then 100 yards rushing a game (24th in the league).

Stafford avg 300 yards passing and had 9TDs to 3 INTs in the playoffs. SF avg 170 yards per game with 2 TDs to 3 INTs. Matt wasn't lights out yesterday, but overall in the playoffs and this yr he was pretty damn good and it blows he's the QB for LA.

It doesn't blow he's the QB for LA. We were 2-1 this year vs LA and up 10 in the one we lost. This close to sweeping these guys. Anyway, he's 34 so I'm not worried. We got Trey.

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Originally posted by Waterbear:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Wanting Jimmy G over Stafford is how to know someone has a very bad drug problem

Hey I have a drug problem but I never said that…

Maybe you have a good drug problem

Originally posted by random49er:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by Hysterikal:

Originally posted by TheGore49er:

I mean did anyone expect these guys to say that they were wrong and that Stafford is a good QB and better than Jimmy? This is going as expected...

The salt from the anti-Stafford people is lovely

Weird that there are Pro Stafford fans on this board celebrating the Rams win.

Why does the conversation have to be forced towards who people are "fans" of instead of the facts and reality of things on the football field, regardless someone's favorite team or players?

When will you tire of this fall back?

What facts do you want to talk about?

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by random49er:

Why does the conversation have to be forced towards who people are "fans" of instead of the facts and reality of things on the football field, regardless someone's favorite team or players?

When will you tire of this fall back?

He's just trying to change the narrative/discussion. Yeah whatever with what I said....you guys like the Rams because you didn't say Stafford sucks lol.

What discussion?

What's up with Jimmy? I need to know what the hell is going on.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Goatie:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by Aj_hwd954:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Live look at the Stafford is a loser crowd trying to grasp at straws

He needed an all-pro roster just beat a team in the super bowl who prior to this season hadn't won a playoff game since 1990

Who cares what the bengals were in the past? They beat the chiefs twice in the past month in a half and the #1 seed in the AFC.

I know that running game for LA was special last night. What they have, 23 attempts for 44 yards?

it's okay to acknowledge the Stafford is good.

Stafford is good but he is not great. The team carried him blah blah blah

So if his good not great what the hell is Jimmy lol?

Stafford had 4,900 yards 41 TD to 17 INTs completing 67% of his passes. They avg less then 100 yards rushing a game (24th in the league).

Stafford avg 300 yards passing and had 9TDs to 3 INTs in the playoffs. SF avg 170 yards per game with 2 TDs to 3 INTs. Matt wasn't lights out yesterday, but overall in the playoffs and this yr he was pretty damn good and it blows he's the QB for LA.

Jimmy is not great.

Originally posted by blizzuntz:

Wanting Jimmy G over Stafford is how to know someone has a very bad drug problem

I'd rather have Lance than Stafford.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

Originally posted by blizzuntz:
Wanting Jimmy G over Stafford is how to know someone has a very bad drug problem

I'd rather have Lance than Stafford.

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by TheWooLick:

His record is a fact. No backpedaling needed.
He is a suoerbowl winner and a playoff winner.

Looks like the Stafford Club and Mattsexuals enjoyed the Rams win.

Has nothing to do about the Rams winning...I was actively rooting for them to lose (and hoping my squares/bets hit). It's funny how people toss out this you wanted the Rams to win because you don't think Stafford is a loser take...Deebo said he was rooting for LA, boy he must be a loser fake 49er fan too then

What is being discussed is how some people were wrong in their takes on him and instead of saying yeah you're right...it's grasping at straws and creating whatever narrative ya'll can make to deny being wrong about something.

Deebo is a 49er player not a fan.

Originally posted by Jcool:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by random49er:
Why does the conversation have to be forced towards who people are "fans" of instead of the facts and reality of things on the football field, regardless someone's favorite team or players?

When will you tire of this fall back?

He's just trying to change the narrative/discussion. Yeah whatever with what I said....you guys like the Rams because you didn't say Stafford sucks lol.

.

What narrative am I trying to change....go on let me know. I post clips and stats backing up everything I have an opinion about. If I'm proven wrong how do I change the overall topic or say something stupid like "ya you're a rams fan because you don't think Stafford is a loser"

Please tell me.

Originally posted by TheWooLick:
Deebo is a 49er player not a fan.

Which means what? He hates his team according to you.