Originally posted by English:Quarterbacks are overpaid..
End thread.
At least with Jimmy, people kinda feel like he's worth it and with potentials. Not sure I can say the same with Carr and Stafford
There are 408 users in the forums
Originally posted by English:Quarterbacks are overpaid..
End thread.
Originally posted by cciowa:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:you can make your point without calling out posters for the sole purpose of inciting..i could say this article caters to fan boys like you but i will refrain. some of us think a tag is not a good thing. so what
Truth bombs galore in this article -
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/18/jimmy-garoppolo-san-francsico-49ers-contract-salary-news-negotiations-franchise-tag-free-agents-value-qb-2018-nfl/
The SusReigns of the world need to read and acknowledge.
The HUGE up front money makes a ton of sense for both JG and the team - he gets paid and the Niners aren't as strapped going forward, leaving a lot of room for future signings.
DO IT.
Originally posted by English:
Quarterbacks are overpaid..
End thread.
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Truth bombs galore in this article -
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/18/jimmy-garoppolo-san-francsico-49ers-contract-salary-news-negotiations-franchise-tag-free-agents-value-qb-2018-nfl/
The SusReigns of the world need to read and acknowledge.
The HUGE up front money makes a ton of sense for both JG and the team - he gets paid and the Niners aren't as strapped going forward, leaving a lot of room for future signings.
DO IT.
The 49ers and Garoppolo should agree to a deal worth $130 million over the next five seasons, with $80 million in guaranteed money and $60 million given up front as a signing bonus.
That 60mil signing bonus going to count against the cap, spread out the 5 years, at 12mil a year. If Jimmy is some how off the team, that's 12mil of dead money a year. That 12mil a year counts against the cap whether Jimmy is on or off the team.
Where's the 'saving' the article is talking about...?
There should be a balance in the guaranteed money between signing bonus and roster bonus.
The up front money is pro-rated over 5 years? I was not aware. Even so, with an ever rising cap, that seems like a reasonable gamble.
Savings in not franchising him 1,2, or even 3 years.
I think some are confusing roster bonus with signing bonus. Roster bonus counts against the cap for only that year. This is why you would read news about team having to decide whether to cut the player or accept the player by roster bonus date.
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Originally posted by qnnhan7:Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Originally posted by qnnhan7:Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Truth bombs galore in this article -
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/18/jimmy-garoppolo-san-francsico-49ers-contract-salary-news-negotiations-franchise-tag-free-agents-value-qb-2018-nfl/
The SusReigns of the world need to read and acknowledge.
The HUGE up front money makes a ton of sense for both JG and the team - he gets paid and the Niners aren't as strapped going forward, leaving a lot of room for future signings.
DO IT.
The 49ers and Garoppolo should agree to a deal worth $130 million over the next five seasons, with $80 million in guaranteed money and $60 million given up front as a signing bonus.
That 60mil signing bonus going to count against the cap, spread out the 5 years, at 12mil a year. If Jimmy is some how off the team, that's 12mil of dead money a year. That 12mil a year counts against the cap whether Jimmy is on or off the team.
Where's the 'saving' the article is talking about...?
There should be a balance in the guaranteed money between signing bonus and roster bonus.
The up front money is pro-rated over 5 years? I was not aware. Even so, with an ever rising cap, that seems like a reasonable gamble.
Savings in not franchising him 1,2, or even 3 years.
I think some are confusing roster bonus with signing bonus. Roster bonus counts against the cap for only that year. This is why you would read news about team having to decide whether to cut the player or accept the player by roster bonus date.
Any reason why a chunk of the up front $ couldn't be deemed a roster bonus?
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Possible, but that's crazy. 60mil chunk hit in one year for just one player. I'm sure there are other player contracts to account for that year already alotted.
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Originally posted by qnnhan7:Possible, but that's crazy. 60mil chunk hit in one year for just one player. I'm sure there are other player contracts to account for that year already alotted.
But that's perfect for this team - get the QB paid in a year when the team is flush with cash. $60M to JG would still leave almost $60M in cap space this year... and over $100M next (assuming for the sake of argument here only no FA signings).
Originally posted by qnnhan7:i thought he was the spawn of satan one time?
I don't underestimate the wizardry of Paraage
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Truth bombs galore in this article -
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/18/jimmy-garoppolo-san-francsico-49ers-contract-salary-news-negotiations-franchise-tag-free-agents-value-qb-2018-nfl/
The SusReigns of the world need to read and acknowledge.
The HUGE up front money makes a ton of sense for both JG and the team - he gets paid and the Niners aren't as strapped going forward, leaving a lot of room for future signings.
DO IT.
The 49ers and Garoppolo should agree to a deal worth $130 million over the next five seasons, with $80 million in guaranteed money and $60 million given up front as a signing bonus.
That 60mil signing bonus going to count against the cap, spread out the 5 years, at 12mil a year. If Jimmy is some how off the team, that's 12mil of dead money a year. That 12mil a year counts against the cap whether Jimmy is on or off the team.
Where's the 'saving' the article is talking about...?
There should be a balance in the guaranteed money between signing bonus and roster bonus.
The up front money is pro-rated over 5 years? I was not aware. Even so, with an ever rising cap, that seems like a reasonable gamble.
Savings in not franchising him 1,2, or even 3 years.
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Any reason why a chunk of the up front $ couldn't be deemed a roster bonus?
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Originally posted by qnnhan7:
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:
Truth bombs galore in this article -
https://www.mercurynews.com/2018/01/18/jimmy-garoppolo-san-francsico-49ers-contract-salary-news-negotiations-franchise-tag-free-agents-value-qb-2018-nfl/
The SusReigns of the world need to read and acknowledge.
The HUGE up front money makes a ton of sense for both JG and the team - he gets paid and the Niners aren't as strapped going forward, leaving a lot of room for future signings.
DO IT.
The 49ers and Garoppolo should agree to a deal worth $130 million over the next five seasons, with $80 million in guaranteed money and $60 million given up front as a signing bonus.
That 60mil signing bonus going to count against the cap, spread out the 5 years, at 12mil a year. If Jimmy is some how off the team, that's 12mil of dead money a year. That 12mil a year counts against the cap whether Jimmy is on or off the team.
Where's the 'saving' the article is talking about...?
There should be a balance in the guaranteed money between signing bonus and roster bonus.
The up front money is pro-rated over 5 years? I was not aware. Even so, with an ever rising cap, that seems like a reasonable gamble.
Savings in not franchising him 1,2, or even 3 years.
Originally posted by 4912:Originally posted by Wu-5Rings:
Goodmorning everyone!!! Just want to share a wonderful morning with my niner brethrens,
All the wonderful news and positive energy all around us!
Good things are finally coming our way!!!
Go niners!![]()
Just wanted to share some positive energy!! Free at last!!
brethren!!!Originally posted by dmax:hush up...he's looks like a greek god
Originally posted by NineFourNiner:Originally posted by qnnhan7:Possible, but that's crazy. 60mil chunk hit in one year for just one player. I'm sure there are other player contracts to account for that year already alotted.
But that's perfect for this team - get the QB paid in a year when the team is flush with cash. $60M to JG would still leave almost $60M in cap space this year... and over $100M next (assuming for the sake of argument here only no FA signings).