Originally posted by brodiebluebanaszak:
Originally posted by Fasteddy:
That's my concern. some formula of dollars committed vs. incentive. Basically, I'm interested if we can manage the risk and preserve dollars.
His speed and performance when on the field is not questioned. Watching him shred a team in the playoffs, incredible.
He's not a one-trick Pony. I didn't have to put in that Green Bay clip. There was plenty of highlights from other games it's just what he does
Hey, I agree with you. That game happens to be the first thing that comes to mind, as it was prolific. I've seen him look really good in many games, and his speed is a total weapon. That being said, there is some to be said for player availability. He's been significantly injured at least twice, and had several occasions being out multiple games. His timeline with us is not enough years to warrant that much injury. RBs, unfortunately, have the lowest lifespan, and I fear he's already a player you can't expect to get more than 25% participation.
That's why I'm saying a contract which is heavily incentive laden would be the way to go with him. This area also happens to be one of our strongest talent development areas. We could look for some burners, although 4.3 speed is rare.