Los Angeles Rams of Anaheim thread

Originally posted by 49erWill:

Originally posted by ArizonaBlue:
As to rams fans. We kinda are the best.

I've been here a long time. I'm also stuck spending a lot of time im the Bay Area. I've yet to meet one single fan who knows more about YOUR team than I do.

I've tried.

Why do care so much about our team?

penis envy?

Originally posted by 49erWill:

Why do care so much about our team?

He/she knows the majority of fellow Rams fans are still clueless

Originally posted by Jeepzilla:

Originally posted by 49erWill:

Originally posted by ArizonaBlue:

As to rams fans. We kinda are the best.

I've been here a long time. I'm also stuck spending a lot of time im the Bay Area. I've yet to meet one single fan who knows more about YOUR team than I do.

I've tried.

Why do care so much about our team?

penis envy?

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

Lol
Wtf?

Todays I vill tells yous abouts ze rams an ze 9ers match ooops...

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

Lol
Wtf?

Todays I vill tells yous abouts ze rams an ze 9ers match ooops...

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

A few days ago

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

What next? A moma joke? You talk about clueless fans. Two days ago you make a post laughing about how much LA spent on FA's. You are so clueless that you dont realize SF spent twice as much on FA this year.

How is that undersized RB working out?

Originally posted by ramsfan:

A few days ago

What next? A moma joke? You talk about clueless fans. Two days ago you make a post laughing about how much LA spent on FA's. You are so clueless that you dont realize SF spent twice as much on FA this year.

How is that undersized RB working out?

👆🏼Exhibit A: #thinskinned #doesntknowjacks**t

Did you even bother to watch the video (where the guy gives the Rams a slight, 1 yr ahead, edge)??? It's pretty obvious you haven't

Please come up with something better than inane buzzwords and weakass arguments if you're gonna post smack

Your formula of heavily weighing the FA signings to SF (most of which was for Jimmy G) ignores the in effect FA acquisitions via trade the Rams made..in NFL economics these down the road usually cost more in the long run than signing true FA (you're relinquishing picks, losing the opportunity of having players under rookie deals, and have less cap flexibility)

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
👆🏼Exhibit A: #thinskinned #doesntknowjacks**t

Did you even bother to watch the video (where the guy gives the Rams a slight, 1 yr ahead, edge)??? It's pretty obvious you haven't

Please come up with something better than inane buzzwords and weakass arguments if you're gonna post smack

Your formula of heavily weighing the FA signings to SF (most of which was for Jimmy G) ignores the in effect FA acquisitions via trade the Rams made..in NFL economics these down the road usually cost more in the long run than signing true FA (you're relinquishing picks, losing the opportunity of having players under rookie deals, and have less cap flexibility)

Are you that clueless? FA signings. Your words. You criticized that. Jimmy G is not one. Rams had 15 mill in FA signings in 2018. Sf 28 mil.

The fact that you do not know that makes you clueless.

Originally posted by ramsfan:

Are you that clueless? FA signings. Your words. You criticized that. Jimmy G is not one. Rams had 15 mill in FA signings in 2018. Sf 28 mil.

The fact that you do not know that makes you clueless.

Jimmy G was a FA after last season, genius. Niners then re-signed him to a then-record contract, which makes up a majority of that "$28M" you're touting.

And, no I'm not even factoring your guys' recent extensions of Gurley and Donald, which if counted as a "FA signing" (which in essence it was in AD's case since he was holding out), narrows that spending gap you're harping on about even more.

You fail to see that though the Niners dollar-wise technically spent more, they acquired more long-term value. The Rams' big acquisitions though costing less in FA $$ spent, when factored in with all the draft capital traded away and their big in-house extensions for Gurley and Donald bloats the true figure of their spending. They've in essence mortgaged a lot for the championship window opportunity that they feel they're in. Is what they've done wise? We'll see soon enough, but it'll likely suck for the Rams in a few years when Goff is gonna a new contract, roster holes need to be plugged with less draft picks, and if too much dead money paid to ex-vets start to pile up.

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:
Jimmy G was a FA after last season, genius. Niners then re-signed him to a then-record contract, which makes up a majority of that "$28M" you're touting.

And, no I'm not even factoring your guys' recent extensions of Gurley and Donald, which if counted as a "FA signing" (which in essence it was in AD's case since he was holding out), narrows that spending gap you're harping on about even more.

You fail to see that though the Niners dollar-wise technically spent more, they acquired more long-term value. The Rams' big acquisitions though costing less in FA $$ spent, when factored in with all the draft capital traded away and their big in-house extensions for Gurley and Donald bloats the true figure of their spending. They've in essence mortgaged a lot for the championship window opportunity that they feel they're in. Is what they've done wise? We'll see soon enough, but it'll likely suck for the Rams in a few years when Goff is gonna a new contract, roster holes need to be plugged with less draft picks, and if too much dead money paid to ex-vets start to pile up.

Again Shelock. Jimmy G is not part of the calculation. The only FA Rams signed this year are Suh and Shields to one year contracts so they have no bearing on the future., Meanwhile, the shrimp RB you signed does affect next years cap.

If you are counting anyone else then you do not know what a free agent is.

Originally posted by ramsfan:

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

A few days ago

Originally posted by Dr_Bill_Walsh:

What next? A moma joke? You talk about clueless fans. Two days ago you make a post laughing about how much LA spent on FA's. You are so clueless that you dont realize SF spent twice as much on FA this year.

How is that undersized RB working out?

Why are you so angry?

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Why are you so angry?

I'm guessing cause he's a rams fan...

Originally posted by Hoovtrain:

Originally posted by ArizonaBlue:

Originally posted by Morgan49:
#thinskin

Me? I've been posting here for 5 years or so.

I'd say you all have way thinner skin than I do.

But, hey. Let's go!

Lol

INTERNET FIGHT!

Originally posted by ArizonaBlue:

As to rams fans. We kinda are the best.

I've been here a long time. I'm also stuck spending a lot of time im the Bay Area. I've yet to meet one single fan who knows more about YOUR team than I do.

I've tried.

Are you talking about the team or the fans? Because a fanbase who's team that's relocated as many times as they've had winning seasons since 2001 shouldn't ever be concidered the best.