Trumaine Johnson cb

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Can probably add Tartt in there but yeah pretty much.. More than likely we can extend one by one in each of next 3 years. Jimmy is locked up, no reason to sit on the money like a chicken on an egg.

It's crazy go look at teams cap space in 2019, we're sitting in $83 million and it's not even top of the league. All these teams have a ton of money and when good young players are valuable you gotta jump on it, especially when we only have maybe two or 3 guys we need to worry about resigning in the next couple yrs

As long as Paraag is running the show we are in good hands he'll never put us in a situation were we will have to start cutting guys because of bad deals. I bet other teams are envious of our chief strategy officer

Originally posted by gold49digger:

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:

Can probably add Tartt in there but yeah pretty much.. More than likely we can extend one by one in each of next 3 years. Jimmy is locked up, no reason to sit on the money like a chicken on an egg.

It's crazy go look at teams cap space in 2019, we're sitting in $83 million and it's not even top of the league. All these teams have a ton of money and when good young players are valuable you gotta jump on it, especially when we only have maybe two or 3 guys we need to worry about resigning in the next couple yrs

As long as Paraag is running the show we are in good hands he'll never put us in a situation were we will have to start cutting guys because of bad deals. I bet other teams are envious of our chief strategy officer

funny how paraag is seen as a positive asset compared to last couple of years.

I doubt the 49ers will be big players for Trumaine Johnson, regardless. It's hard to believe that is a prudent move. The 49ers have made it clear they will target players who fit their model for sustained success. Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

Originally posted by RonMexico:

Originally posted by Hopper:

MM

I doubt the 49ers will be big players for Trumaine Johnson, regardless. It's hard to believe that is a prudent move. The 49ers have made it clear they will target players who fit their model for sustained success. Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

http://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/home-page/how-richard-sherman-fits-49ers-offseason-plans

Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Hopper:
MM

I doubt the 49ers will be big players for Trumaine Johnson, regardless. It's hard to believe that is a prudent move. The 49ers have made it clear they will target players who fit their model for sustained success. Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

http://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/home-page/how-richard-sherman-fits-49ers-offseason-plans

This is my problem with Johnson.

Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

He's never been a #1 "put him on an island with the other guy's top WR and forget about it" CB, he's never been a top 10 CB in the NFL, there is no reason to expect him to become that but he'll be paid as one of the top two CBs in football.

Originally posted by cjsmoove:

Originally posted by gold49digger:

Originally posted by Tru2RedNGold25:

Originally posted by NYniner85:

Originally posted by SmokeCrabtrees:
Can probably add Tartt in there but yeah pretty much.. More than likely we can extend one by one in each of next 3 years. Jimmy is locked up, no reason to sit on the money like a chicken on an egg.

It's crazy go look at teams cap space in 2019, we're sitting in $83 million and it's not even top of the league. All these teams have a ton of money and when good young players are valuable you gotta jump on it, especially when we only have maybe two or 3 guys we need to worry about resigning in the next couple yrs

As long as Paraag is running the show we are in good hands he'll never put us in a situation were we will have to start cutting guys because of bad deals. I bet other teams are envious of our chief strategy officer

funny how paraag is seen as a positive asset compared to last couple of years.

Right... It wasn't to long ago its "he's a mole, must be the leak, he's messing up the team, damn near Russian spy,.... Ultimately it was the rift between Balke n Harbaugh....im glad York did the smart move and kept him.

Originally posted by Hopper:

Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:

Originally posted by Hopper:

MM

I doubt the 49ers will be big players for Trumaine Johnson, regardless. It's hard to believe that is a prudent move. The 49ers have made it clear they will target players who fit their model for sustained success. Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

http://www.nbcsports.com/bayarea/home-page/how-richard-sherman-fits-49ers-offseason-plans

This is my problem with Johnson.

Johnson will command big money, and he has not been a take-half-the-field-away type of player that his price tag suggests he should be.

He's never been a #1 "put him on an island with the other guy's top WR and forget about it" CB, he's never been a top 10 CB in the NFL, there is no reason to expect him to become that but he'll be paid as one of the top two CBs in football.

Agreed.

Originally posted by gold49digger:

Originally posted by RonMexico:

damn garcon is a beast.

Originally posted by jcs:

It was a nice thought but we're not signing him now.