Top 100 Players of 2012

Originally posted by ghostrider:

Originally posted by Druckenmiller14:

Originally posted by ghostrider:
I get that, but Aldon is clearly a game changer. I think it's arguable that he's at least as much a game changer (if not more) than Miller. I just don't see the difference being 52+ players, but they didn't give me a vote

I get that, but everyone on that list is a "game-changer." And you're really looking hard through your red and gold colored glasses if you think hes a better overall player at this point in his career than Von Miller.

I'm not going to disagree with you on that point, but do you think the difference is 52+ players?

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Aldon is a game changer. but he's not involved in getting the team into those situations (3rd and long) where he can make a difference. That may or may not be his fault, but it is what it is.

Aldon should be an every down player next year, but the assumption of the people voting will be that on 1st/2nd down next year, Aldon will be where Von was last year, and Von will be improved on those down. On 3rd down they will be comparable.

Originally posted by ghostrider:

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Aldon is a game changer. but he's not involved in getting the team into those situations (3rd and long) where he can make a difference. That may or may not be his fault, but it is what it is.

Aldon should be an every down player next year, but the assumption of the people voting will be that on 1st/2nd down next year, Aldon will be where Von was last year, and Von will be improved on those down. On 3rd down they will be comparable.

So I guess my question is still out there... Do you think there is a 52+ player difference in their ability? I can understand the argument as to why Miller should be ranked higher, but so much higher?

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:

Originally posted by ghostrider:

Originally posted by 49erfeeeever808:
Aldon is a game changer. but he's not involved in getting the team into those situations (3rd and long) where he can make a difference. That may or may not be his fault, but it is what it is.

Aldon should be an every down player next year, but the assumption of the people voting will be that on 1st/2nd down next year, Aldon will be where Von was last year, and Von will be improved on those down. On 3rd down they will be comparable.

So I guess my question is still out there... Do you think there is a 52+ player difference in their ability? I can understand the argument as to why Miller should be ranked higher, but so much higher?

Don't ask me, I'm still trying to figure out why Tebow is on this list.

Originally posted by Oakland-Niner:
Dont forget!! Tonight is the unvieling of Alex Smith in the Top 100......

Originally posted by jones49:
Tebow in top 100 but no Aldon...sorry but there's no excuse for that.

Originally posted by niners4lyfe:
players are stupid.

Originally posted by jdt84_2:
so it is frank gore
justin smith
pat willis

left. i did not expect frank to be this high.

Originally posted by jdt84_2:
so it is frank gore
justin smith
pat willis

left. i did not expect frank to be this high.

Originally posted by DaDivaRecieva15:
Are those official or you just guessing?

Originally posted by jdt84_2:

Originally posted by DaDivaRecieva15:
Are those official or you just guessing?

pretty dang official. while talking about forte they listed gore as one of the remaining RBs left ahead of forte. and guaranteed pat is on it. and am willing to go on a limb that justin is on it.