Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 421 users in the forums

🏈 2026 NFL ENTRY DRAFT 🏈-Do not tip picks!

  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
I guess we have a completely different definition of what the word fact means.

Yeah, you can have your *own opinions*, but not your own facts.
[ Edited by Giedi on Apr 24, 2026 at 1:26 PM ]
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by gold49digger:
I love the trade downs. I didn't not want lomu and was concerned we were gonna get him lol.

Im all for Pregnon, Mcneil-Warren, or maybe Boston but after another trade down.

All in all, I cannot complain.

The Cardinals picked up a player that will be good, but still has a long way to go and now you have a rb that is paid 50 million guaranteed.

Seahawks picked up a rb while talented, has never started a game and now hes probablg RB1 out of the gate. It could work better since theoretically there's less wear and tear on him.

The Rams should have grabbed Lemon and made my nightmares come true, but seeing them reach for Simpson and seeing how pissed McVay is made me smile.

Idk how others are feeling, but I love this offseason all and all.

I agree on the trade downs. As others have said, this is a bit similar to the 1986 draft.

Now if ShanaLynch can hit on day two the way they hit on day three players, I will be very happy.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by scooterhd:
4th in rushing yards since 2019 with what talent outside of Trent? Hes turning mid and late round picks into functional starters.

I think Colby is going to be another good player that develops under Foerster. But I'd like ShanaLynch to give him some love and some more day two picks.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by sick9erfan:
You are correct but with our history we need clean players not clean ACL tears.

Agree, but also we got Gore with is two (if I recall correctly) horrible knee injuries that moved him out of a potential first round pick. He turned out pretty well.

I think more picks is potentially more depth to offset future injuries. NY85 likes to say injuries are a part of football - and he's 💯% right. So add more depth so that if QB 1 goes down, there is QB 2. Etc...
Originally posted by irishluder:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
I'm a bit sad that we didn't get an OT in the 1st. But I'm ok with the trade-backs that netted us another 2nd, a 3rd, and a 5th. So I'm hoping that we address Trent's replacement with one of the 2nd round picks. Overall, I'm pretty happy.
What OT is worth a 2nd round pick?

Markel Bell worth a 4th

Absolutely not!! No more late round O-lineman. If we get that deep in the draft without a OT then I'd rather not draft one at al.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Article on the Athletic thinks that we could receive a 2nd for Mac today. I haven't lined up the QB needy teams in the upper quarter of the draft but think the Jets and Cards. Cards could be nice at 34 but they are divisional and we will all scream Kyle helped out friends and family despite being in the same division.

i would still do it. Especially if it's a high 2nd.

Agree. They have a developing 2nd year QB in Kurtis Rourke. He's no Mac Jones, but I'd love a 2nd for Mac Jones and possibly a day three pick next year, and put Kurtis as QB 2. I really hope and pray kurtis rourke will be another day three gem. Then again that annual injury bug just puts a damper on trading away any sort of depth that we have.
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
Originally posted by irishluder:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
I'm a bit sad that we didn't get an OT in the 1st. But I'm ok with the trade-backs that netted us another 2nd, a 3rd, and a 5th. So I'm hoping that we address Trent's replacement with one of the 2nd round picks. Overall, I'm pretty happy.
What OT is worth a 2nd round pick?

Markel Bell worth a 4th

Absolutely not!! No more late round O-lineman. If we get that deep in the draft without a OT then I'd rather not draft one at al.

I don't think we get an OT this year. I can see an OG and a C.
  • Giedi
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 33,859
Originally posted by jakedogg:
Cleveland #39? Think 1986-Bill Walsh started out somewhere in the teens and ended up with his first pick being Larry Roberts at #39. Several trades later he ended up with 7 starter picks in the first 102. Then there was Don Griffin round 6 and Brent Jones a year later from the scrap heap. That's 9 starters who took 2 years before that almost 3-peat started. The '86 class was not top heavy and neither is this one. Is 4 in the top 100 doable. We should hope for 5.

Yeah, agree 💯%. That 4th round pick in 1986 wasn't too bad either??
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Article on the Athletic thinks that we could receive a 2nd for Mac today. I haven't lined up the QB needy teams in the upper quarter of the draft but think the Jets and Cards. Cards could be nice at 34 but they are divisional and we will all scream Kyle helped out friends and family despite being in the same division.

i would still do it. Especially if it's a high 2nd.

Agree. They have a developing 2nd year QB in Kurtis Rourke. He's no Mac Jones, but I'd love a 2nd for Mac Jones and possibly a day three pick next year, and put Kurtis as QB 2. I really hope and pray kurtis rourke will be another day three gem. Then again that annual injury bug just puts a damper on trading away any sort of depth that we have.

Absolutely agree with Rourke. Let him show his stuff in preseason and mop up and we can trade him next year or after if he's good. The Kyle graduate school of QBs is worth something.
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Article on the Athletic thinks that we could receive a 2nd for Mac today. I haven't lined up the QB needy teams in the upper quarter of the draft but think the Jets and Cards. Cards could be nice at 34 but they are divisional and we will all scream Kyle helped out friends and family despite being in the same division.

i would still do it. Especially if it's a high 2nd.

Agree. They have a developing 2nd year QB in Kurtis Rourke. He's no Mac Jones, but I'd love a 2nd for Mac Jones and possibly a day three pick next year, and put Kurtis as QB 2. I really hope and pray kurtis rourke will be another day three gem. Then again that annual injury bug just puts a damper on trading away any sort of depth that we have.

Absolutely agree with Rourke. Let him show his stuff in preseason and mop up and we can trade him next year or after if he's good. The Kyle graduate school of QBs is worth something.

How do we know this? He hasn't even played yet.

Bet there were people saying Purdy was no Mac Jones...
Originally posted by Giedi:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
I guess we have a completely different definition of what the word fact means.

Yeah, you can have your *own opinions*, but not your own facts.
Originally posted by mitpdub:
Article on the Athletic thinks that we could receive a 2nd for Mac today. I haven't lined up the QB needy teams in the upper quarter of the draft but think the Jets and Cards. Cards could be nice at 34 but they are divisional and we will all scream Kyle helped out friends and family despite being in the same division.

i would still do it. Especially if it's a high 2nd.

Does the article on the Athletic quote a source on this? Or is it just an unreliable "insiders tell me?" I think Kyle really wants to move Mac and pick up another draft pick or two in the process. The QB that Kyle drafted last year is ready to assume backup duties.
hmmm

  • pdc20
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,245
I would take this trade personally.
Originally posted by jreff22:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
Originally posted by irishluder:
Originally posted by DaleGribble:
Originally posted by 9ersLiferInChicago:
I'm a bit sad that we didn't get an OT in the 1st. But I'm ok with the trade-backs that netted us another 2nd, a 3rd, and a 5th. So I'm hoping that we address Trent's replacement with one of the 2nd round picks. Overall, I'm pretty happy.
What OT is worth a 2nd round pick?

Markel Bell worth a 4th

Absolutely not!! No more late round O-lineman. If we get that deep in the draft without a OT then I'd rather not draft one at al.

I don't think we get an OT this year. I can see an OG and a C.

I would strongly consider Isaiah World with our 3rd round pick.

He has OT talent we dont normally have available to us and his recovery timeline meshes with Trent Williams still being here.
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone