49ers vs. Chargers Tickets Available! →

There are 592 users in the forums

Tyler Warren - TE/Offensive Weapon

Browse 49ers books and videos
Originally posted by NYniner85:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
lol man you are really trying hard to act like we don't already run this scheme

Juice was brought in to be an OW

He ain't juice though. He can't run block like he can and that's primarily his role.

you want to keep the same scheme half his time on the field is run blocking and pass protection all the same. Sweet he get 25 targets a yr.
Still stuck at FB position. You just posted on how we don't use Juice like a traditional FB with his snaps

I see run blocking in all his vids and doing a good job at it too

the one thing you're missing in this, is Juice ain't no Warren

[ Edited by 49AllTheTime on Feb 25, 2025 at 5:49 PM ]
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,723
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because

Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
This team is not drafting him in the 1st. With all our other needs.

I'm not saying we will but free agency can fill a lot of needs
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

Taking a WR last year was the right decision.

If we didn't take Pearsall last year we would potentially only have Jennings as our only proven WR to start week 1
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite

Seeing that Mason Graham isn't gonna be available my favorite player for pick 11 is Warren and that won't change

I'll be ok with guys like Mike Green, Kelvin Banks or Will Johnson but Warren is the clear #1 for me.
[ Edited by Monsterniner on Feb 25, 2025 at 7:21 PM ]
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,723
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because

Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

When healthy it's one of the very best rosters in the nfl. I hope they keep doing EXACTLY what they've been doing.
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because

Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

49ers are either taking Warren, a bona fide stud whose value requires unique coaching or

a sub par OT who will be average at best (low ceiling)

or an Edge that's a huge gamble (low floor)
[ Edited by SunDevilNiner79 on Feb 25, 2025 at 7:52 PM ]
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because

Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

49ers are either taking Warren, a bona fide stud whose value requires unique coaching or

a sub par OT who will be average at best (low ceiling)

or an Edge that's a huge gamble (low floor)

I can see how he's really good. Just not a need for this team. As compared to other categories. It depends a little how he works out. Is he fast? He's certainly big and can catch at the College level. What about against bigger and faster guys? I'd like to see him run. Speed at TE isn't everything and he's not as fast as Kittle. He's more of a Gronk big body. Like who he is compared to. I can see the value if he can be that good. But other needs are more pressing if you can get a high quality offensive or defensive lineman. Or even Malaki Starks at S.
[ Edited by SanDiego49er on Feb 25, 2025 at 8:04 PM ]
  • okdkid
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 23,723
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by SunDevilNiner79:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by okdkid:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Originally posted by 49AllTheTime:
Dang, the more I show this guy, the more he is turning into a favorite



We have offensive and defensive line needs and huge holes. We don't need a TE. We have the best TE in the league. The Eagles and Lions build the TRENCHES. That's why they are good. Why the Eagles can beat the Chiefs too and we can't.

So what

Don't need to burn a 1st on them just because

Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

49ers are either taking Warren, a bona fide stud whose value requires unique coaching or

a sub par OT who will be average at best (low ceiling)

or an Edge that's a huge gamble (low floor)

I can see how he's really good. Just not a need for this team. As compared to other categories. It depends a little how he works out. Is he fast? He's certainly big and can catch at the College level. What about against bigger and faster guys? I'd like to see him run. Speed at TE isn't everything and he's not as fast as Kittle. He's more of a Gronk big body. Like who he is compared to. I can see the value if he can be that good. But other needs are more pressing if you can get a high quality offensive or defensive lineman. Or even Malaki Starks at S.

Drafting for need is how you end up with mediocre talent. Never pass up potential all pros.
  • All22
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 2,881
Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

Taking a WR last year was the right decision.

If we didn't take Pearsall last year we would potentially only have Jennings as our only proven WR to start week 1

Pearsall didn't play week 1.

Taking Pearsall in the first only makes sense if you intend to let Aiyuk walk
[ Edited by All22 on Feb 25, 2025 at 8:35 PM ]
Originally posted by All22:
Originally posted by Sask49erFan:
Originally posted by SanDiego49er:
Spending a 1st in a TE this year is about as STUPID as spending a 1st on a WR last year. For this team. But it would not surprise me at all. Given their track record.

Taking a WR last year was the right decision.

If we didn't take Pearsall last year we would potentially only have Jennings as our only proven WR to start week 1

Pearsall didn't play week 1.

Taking Pearsall in the first only makes sense if you intend to let Aiyuk walk
Originally posted by okdkid:
Drafting for need is how you end up with mediocre talent. Never pass up potential all pros.
exactly

Originally posted by All22:
Pearsall didn't play week 1.

Taking Pearsall in the first only makes sense if you intend to let Aiyuk walk
Persall was added to have another weapon and WRs who might be gone in the future.. and it looks like it's going that way
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone