Originally posted by Phoenix49ers:
Originally posted by krizay:
Lance makes ZERO sense at #3
My issue with Lance is that if you draft him, you're hoping that he develops into what Fields already is right now and then shows more improvement on top of that. I also don't buy the argument that he has some enormous ceiling while Fields doesn't. I think Fields provides you much of the same upside while having a larger resume overall, having more big performances against top competition.
If Fields had gone out and only attempted ten passes against Bama in the National Championship the way Lance only attempted 10 passes against JM in the FCS Championship, people would have been losing their damn minds.
I agree with this, but also our pick is technically and hopefully sitting the first year which is why I think they can consider Lance and are checking him out. (and should)
Lance makes sense because he's the type a competitive team trades up for and gives time to develop (think Mahomes), a mid or late first team etc, but in todays world QB are valued even more than ever.
We fit the competitive mold, but we have a choice of him or Fields so like you said I think Fields makes more sense given his resume and skill set, also what we already paid to be at 3.
I still have PTSD from the McGlinchey year.

