Rep the Red & Gold: Shop 49ers Gear →

There are 1,102 users in the forums

Juan Thornhill S Virginia

Browse 49ers books and videos
Mar 28, 2019 at 6:00 AM
Originally posted by cortana49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

The problem with PFF is that their whole pitch is analytics, but as they've become their own media brand that wants to generate clicks they do A TON of stuff that discredits what they claim to be.

For instance, assigning a player a coverage score from 16 total snaps is just junk. It's total junk. You either believe in analytics and you take them seriously, or you don't. There's no halfway or both ways on that, and PFF increasingly tries to have it both ways.
Mar 28, 2019 at 8:30 AM
Originally posted by PopeyeJonesing:
Originally posted by cortana49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

The problem with PFF is that their whole pitch is analytics, but as they've become their own media brand that wants to generate clicks they do A TON of stuff that discredits what they claim to be.

For instance, assigning a player a coverage score from 16 total snaps is just junk. It's total junk. You either believe in analytics and you take them seriously, or you don't. There's no halfway or both ways on that, and PFF increasingly tries to have it both ways.
You read that wrong lol

That's from every coverage play from 2016 to 2018. He had 16 targets.
Mar 28, 2019 at 11:54 PM
  • Furlow
  • Veteran
  • Posts: 25,451
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by PopeyeJonesing:
Originally posted by cortana49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

The problem with PFF is that their whole pitch is analytics, but as they've become their own media brand that wants to generate clicks they do A TON of stuff that discredits what they claim to be.

For instance, assigning a player a coverage score from 16 total snaps is just junk. It's total junk. You either believe in analytics and you take them seriously, or you don't. There's no halfway or both ways on that, and PFF increasingly tries to have it both ways.
You read that wrong lol

That's from every coverage play from 2016 to 2018. He had 16 targets.

16 total targets in 3 seasons and he did that?
Mar 29, 2019 at 6:34 AM
Originally posted by philosoraptor:
Originally posted by PopeyeJonesing:
Originally posted by cortana49:
Originally posted by NYniner85:

The problem with PFF is that their whole pitch is analytics, but as they've become their own media brand that wants to generate clicks they do A TON of stuff that discredits what they claim to be.

For instance, assigning a player a coverage score from 16 total snaps is just junk. It's total junk. You either believe in analytics and you take them seriously, or you don't. There's no halfway or both ways on that, and PFF increasingly tries to have it both ways.
You read that wrong lol

That's from every coverage play from 2016 to 2018. He had 16 targets.

That's what I thought lol
Apr 17, 2019 at 7:49 AM
Search
YouTube
Flipboard
Instagram
Threads
✕
Open Menu Search Share 49ersWebzone